View clinical trials related to Varicose Ulcer.
Filter by:Approximately 200 patients (100 in each treatment group) nationally with chronic venous leg ulcers will be randomized to GrafixPL™PRIME plus standard compression therapy or standard compression therapy alone for up to 12 weeks in order to compare the clinical outcomes between the two groups. Specifically, at this Georgetown site, approximately 30 subjects will be recruited.
Chronic venous ulcers are considered a problem with a big morbidity impact on both the health facilities and patients, skin-grafting have shown not so perfect outcomes with such ulcers. In this study, the investigators compare combining autologous platelet rich plasma treatments with partial skin grafting in chronic ulcers, the results were compared to using only partial skin grafting, and among various types of chronic resistant ulcers.
Pilot study of a soft, flexible pressure and temperature sensor
Venous leg ulcers (VLU) are slow healing wounds. They have a high recurrence rate and are associated with pain, infection, smell and exudate. 60% of VLU become chronic. Current therapeutic approaches are multifaceted and focus on improving wound healing and preventing recurrences. As those approaches include compression therapy, leg elevation, specific exercises for the foot/ ankle region and a protein rich diet/ nutrition plan a multidisciplinary team of health care professionals such as nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy and nutrition specialists. Most persons with VLU have a knowledge deficit in regards to therapeutic measures and hence have difficulties with adherence to treatment protocols/ management plans. It is of utmost importance, and best practice, that the treatment team provides effective patient education and support during the learning phase. However, there is little evidence and no published studies that describe and evaluate effective multidisciplinary educational interventions that target compliance/ adherence to the treatment plan in patients with VLU. Therefore the investigators propose to develop an evidence-based interprofessional educational intervention and evaluate its feasibility first in a pilot study and subsequently in a randomized controlled trail. Method/Design: Firstly, the development of an evidence based education intervention in collaboration with an expert panel and secondly a randomized controlled pilot study in one wound care outpatient clinic is proposed. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 23. Univariate and bivariate analysis will be conducted according to the data level and distribution of the data. Discussion: The TIEIVLU will firstly develop an evidenced based educational intervention and secondly examine the feasibility of implementing this education intervention in a realistic care context in patients with VLU. The results will inform the final design of a following RCT which will examine the effectiveness of the educational intervention. An intervention that enhances patient adherence to therapy and hence reduces the negative outcomes of VLU would be beneficial to individual patients as well as society as a whole.
This study is being conducted to determine how the PICO™ Negative Pressure Wound Therapy compares to standard care treatment for venous stasis ulcers, as there is no evidence to date.
In this study we are going to measure the blood flow in the lower limbs under cast immobilisation and also under mobilisation with an orthosis. The aim is to evaluate how the aforementioned modalities affect the blood flow and also to compare between the two.
In this study, four different devices which stimulate the blood in the lower extremities are used in ten healthy persons while measuring the blood flow with ultrasound. The aim is to study the haemodynamic effects in the lower extremities of each modality and also to compare those effects between the four modalities in order to identify those which most effective than the others.
The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical effectiveness of a low-power PEMF device, a medium-power PEMF device and a high-power PEMF device as compared to a sham device to treat leg ulcers resulting from venous stasis ("VSLU").
Eight weeks, comprised of four weeks Run-in Phase of Standard Care (SC) treatment followed by four weeks of treatment allocated by randomisation (Treatment Phase). To compare two daily geko™ device treatment durations, six hours and 12 hours, in conjunction with SC, with each other and to SC alone, in patients with venous leg ulcers
The purpose of the research is to compare the influence of customized foot orthoses use on the venous status among healthy female and male subjects. This is a quasi-experimental study which included 20 healthy subjects. Sociodemographic and medical record data are registered. Furthermore,venous function is evaluated by plethysmography, first, without orthoses and, after 20 days, with orthoses.