Urodynamics Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Air-filled and Water-filled Catheters for Use in Cystometric Assessment
A comparative study was conducted and the patient underwent a conventional urodynamic study. In order to successfully determine if the Air-Charged (AC) and Water-Perfused (WP) measurements are equivalent, the two sources of intravesical pressure (Pves) and abdominal pressure (Pabd) were collected concurrently at various fill volumes for the bladder.
The objective of this study was to compare the use of water-filled and air-charged catheters
in determining equivalency between the two technologies during cystometric assessment.
A total of 25 patients (9M/16F) were recruited. All patients underwent cough and Valsalva
manoeuvre pressure tests to measure vesicle pressure (Pves) and abdominal pressure (Pabd). A
single dual-lumen catheter (T-DOC 7Fr Air-Charged® catheter) was used to record air and water
pressures simultaneously.
The primary outcome was to determine if the maximum pressures during Valsalva manoeuvres, as
measured with a single dual-lumen water-perfused and air-charged catheter, are equivalent
when the bladder is filled to 200 cc during a urodynamic evaluation.
Exploratory endpoints included the following:
1. To determine if maximum pressures for cough, as measured with a single dual-lumen
water-perfused and air-charged catheter, are equivalent when the bladder is filled to
100, 200 and Maximum Bladder Capacity (MBC) cc during a urodynamic evaluation.
2. To determine if maximum pressures for Valsalva manoeuvres, as measured with a single
dual-lumen water-perfused and air-charged catheter, are equivalent when the bladder is
filled to 100 and MBC cc during a urodynamic evaluation (as well as 200 cc which is the
primary objective).
3. To determine if the maximum voiding pressure, as measured with a single dual-lumen
water-perfused and air-charged catheter, are equivalent.
4. To determine if the clinical impressions of the urodynamic study are equivalent for the
water-perfused and air-charged catheters.
5. To determine if the compliance of the bladder is equivalent when measured by air-charged
catheters as compared to water-perfused catheters.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01220362 -
Effects of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Surgery on Lower Urinary Tract Function: A Randomized, Controlled Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00790231 -
Effects of Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia on Lower Urinary Tract Function
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05968885 -
Evaluation the Efficacy Between Botox Injection and Combination Pharmacotherapy in Patients With Detrusor Overactivity
|
Phase 4 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03336424 -
Urinary Disorders in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Invasive Vs Non-invasive Investigations.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03509038 -
BUDI (Bariatric UroDynamic Improvement)
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05694793 -
Clinical Feasibility Assessment of Glean Urodynamics System
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03967457 -
Comprehensive Study on the Quality of Life in Cervical Cancer Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT04438499 -
e۰Sense® Catheter Clinical Investigation
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05809154 -
Study of Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Undergoing Urodynamic Examination for the Assessment of Quality, Cost and Treatment Success
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04231474 -
Urodynamic Evaluation in Patients After Spinal Cord Injury
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05666063 -
Comparison of Single Voiding Cycle and Two and Three Voiding Cycles in Ambulatory Urodynamic Studies
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05959655 -
Modern Urodynamics System Efficacy (MUSE) Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT05522686 -
The Effect of Different Education Methods Before Invasive Urodynamics
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03456089 -
Measurement of Bladder Pressure With a Novel External Device, Comparison to Urodynamics Testing
|
N/A |