View clinical trials related to Ulcer.
Filter by:Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) is common urgency condition.The estimate mortality rate about 7 percent from peptic ulcers disease(PUD). A proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) intravenous infusion are standard treatment for high risk ulcer bleeding. Vonoprazan,subclass of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), have beneficial effects including rapid, long-lasting and strong acid suppression.The investigators design a randomized-controlled trial comparison between 72 hours of intravenous PPIs infusion and oral vonoprazan in high risk ulcer UGIH after achieve endoscopic hemostasis. Outcome measurement are re-bleeding rate in 30 days as primary and re-bleeding rate in 3 days, 30 days mortality, rate of angioembolisation, unit of blood transfusion, hospital cost and length of stay as secondary outcome.
The role of exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) in the induction of remission in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease had been well documented. But the role of EEN in children with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) was not clear. In this study, EEN will be combined with corticosteroids or infliximab in the induction of remission in pediatric UC patients with moderate to severe disease activity. The mucosal healing rate at week12 will be compared between the two groups (combine with EEN group VS non-combine group).
Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis (UC) patients with moderate to severe disease activity at high risk of colectomy. Early use of biologic agents will likely be more effective. But there were no studies identified that compared a strategy of upfront biologic-based therapy versus gradual step-up therapy. In our study, newly diagnosed moderate to severe pediatric UC patients (6-18 years old) will be randomly divided into infliximab (IFX) treatment group (Top down group, TD) and corticosteroids (CS) treatment group (Step-up group, SU). Mucosal healing rate at week 12 will be compared between the two groups. The relapse rates and sustained durations of remission within one year will also be evaluated.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of PRA023 in participants with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis. The purpose of Cohort 2 of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of PRA023 in participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who are companion diagnostic positive. After the completion of the 12-week induction, all participants have the option to continue in the open-label extension for another 38 weeks.
Different scoring systems were developed for risk prediction and adjustment of morbidity from perforated duodenal ulcer. However, these scoring systems are not routinely used in perforated duodenal ulcer patient in everyday clinical practice. Identification of patient with a high risk of adverse outcomes following surgery is important for clinical decision-making which can assist in risk stratification and triage e.g. timing and extent of pre-operative respiratory and circulatory stabilization, postoperative admission to a high dependency unit (HDU), the level and extent of monitoring, and inclusion in specific perioperative care protocols. Few studies assessed and compared the accuracy indices of PULP with BOEY and ASA in predicting post PPU repair 30-day morbidity Further, the efficacy must be verified in individual settings like ours. So we wish to assess its efficacy in BPKIHS-a tertiary referral center of eastern Nepal.
Background and rationale: In ulcerative colitis, treating beyond endoscopic healing has shown a reduction of relapse and hospitalization, pushing for histological remission in daily clinical practice.1 However, very little is known on how histological remission is associated with patient reported outcomes (PROMs).2,3 In recent years, several questionnaires have been developed to assess what really matters to patients: symptoms and the burden UC exerts on them.4 As PROMs are getting more and more attention during drug development programs and drug approval by international organizations, including FDA and EMA, the link between objective outcome measures (endoscopic, histological, biochemical) and PROMs should therefore be better characterized. Objectives and design: To investigate prospectively the association of patient reported outcomes (PROMs) and biochemical, endoscopic and histological outcome measures in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Vedolizumab is a medicine that helps to reduce sensitivity and pain in the digestive system for participants with UC or CD. In this study, adults with UC or CD will be treated with vedolizumab according to their clinic's standard practice. Participants will receive vedolizumab as either an infusion or an injection just under the skin (subcutaneous). The main aim of the study is to observe real-world treatment patterns in participants treated with vedolizumab. The study sponsor will not be involved in how participants are treated but will provide instructions on how the clinics will record what happens during the study.
patients reporting at the department of oral medicine with the complain of oral ulceration will be asked to participate in this study.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of efavaleukin alfa on induction of clinical remission in participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Participants will be randomized to receive 1 of 3 efavaleukin alfa doses or placebo during a 12-week induction period. Participants who complete the 12-week induction period will have the option to enter an exploratory long-term treatment period for up to 40 weeks (total of up to 52 weeks of treatment) if, in the opinion of the investigator, they may benefit from continued treatment. During the long-term period, participants randomized to efavaleukin alfa will remain on the same efavaleukin alfa blinded dose; participants randomized to placebo who achieved clinical response at week 12 will remain on placebo; and placebo non-responders (ie, participants randomized to placebo who did not achieve clinical response at week 12) will receive efavaleukin alfa in a blinded manner during continued treatment. All participants will complete a safety follow-up visit 6 weeks after their last dose of investigational product.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of cobitolimod treatment compared to placebo in inducing clinical remission, in participants with moderate to severe active left-sided UC and to evaluate the efficacy of cobitolimod maintenance treatment compared to placebo in inducing or maintaining clinical remission at week 52, in participants with clinical response at week 6 after induction treatment with cobitolimod.