View clinical trials related to Ulcer.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine whether Phosphatidylcholine (LT-02) add on treatment is effective and safe for the induction of remission in ulcerative colitis patients refractory to standard treatment with mesalamine
Patients with endoscopically diagnosed active duodenal ulcer disease were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel and dose-ranging trial. They were randomly assigned into three groups to be treated for up to four weeks and be seen at week 1, 2 and 4: three of ilaprazole, 5, 10 mg/day, and one of Rabeprazole 10 mg/day as positive control. The primary endpoint was the ulcer healing rate at week 4. Healing of ulcer was determined by its resolution from active to scarring stage. Symptoms relief was evaluated as secondary end points by using a graded score. Safety and tolerability were evaluated on basis of clinical assessments.
Leg and foot ulcers due to venous disease or diabetes are chronic wounds that can take 6 or more months to heal. Growth factors have been used to try and improve this healing, however, many such studies have failed, and that is thought to be due enzymes in the wound that degrade the growth factors and prevent them from working. This is a proof of concept study that will evaluate the treatment of chronic leg ulcers with topically applied growth factors that are combined with a therapy to prevent their inactivation in the wound.
A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Comparative Parallel Study To determine the safety and effectiveness of EpiCord as compared to standard of care (SOC) therapy for the treatment of chronic, non-healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs)
The presence of pressure injuries has been considered a quality indicator of health care services and efforts has been made to develop guidelines to prevent this issue. Intensive care unit admissions (ICU) are recognized as risk factors to develop pressure injuries due to reduced mobility of critically ill patients and large number of devices and hard technologies that jeopardize preventive measures, such as, decubitus changes. There are not current definitive evidence about the superiority of any support surface to treat or prevent pressure injuries. The objective of the present study is to analyze if the use of viscoelastic support surface in vulnerable critically ill patients decreases the incidence of pressure injury compared with pyramidal foam support surface. Randomized clinical trial performed in an intensive care unit for adult patients in a philanthropic hospital. Inclusion criteria are patients admitted to ICU with Braden scale ≤ 14. Exclusion criteria are age under 18 years, less than 24 hours of ICU length of stay, contraindication of performing complete institutional preventive measures for support injuries, presence of support injuries at ICU admission or absence of informed consent. Randomization will be made by computerized generated numbers and patients will be allocated in two groups in a ratio of 1:1. All study patients will be cared for according to standard institutional preventive measures. The interventional group will be placed in an ICU bed with viscoelastic support surface and the control group in an ICU bed with pyramidal foam support surface. The main outcome evaluated will be the occurrence of type II pressure injury. Secondary outcomes are the time to the occurrence of pressure injury, length of ICU and hospital stay and 28 days mortality rate. Significance level will be 5%.
This study deals with the feasibility of an ATMP (Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product) production for the treatment of chronic wounds ulcer. Recruitment concerns patients (n=7) with leg ulcers and receiving a skin pellet graft. During surgical procedure, supernumerary biopsies are planned to be done in order to be transferred to laboratory. Then, the possibility of cell extraction (keratinocytes and fibroblasts), expansion, banking and use for skin substitute production in clinical condition is evaluated (primary outcome).
OBJECTIVES: Up to 15% of patients with peptic ulcer bleeding will develop rebleeding, mainly in those with ulcers of higher-risk stigmata (i.e. Forrest class Ia to IIb). Randomized trials show that second-look endoscopy is effective in reducing rebleeding rate. However, whether to withhold aspirin or other anti-platelet agents (for the treatment of established cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases) remains controversial. Studies have shown that although continuation of anti-platelet agents reduces mortality rate due to reduced cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, there is a marginal increase in rebleeding risk. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that continuation of aspirin or other anti-platelet agents coupled with second-look endoscopy could reduce the rebleeding rate without increasing the risk of thromboembolic events in high-risk patients.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of PF-06480605 in subjects with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.
This study will compare the proportion of patients who have wound closure within 12 weeks as well as the time to wound closure in patients receiving Artacentâ„¢ versus standard of care for treatment of non-healing lower extremity wounds. The recurrence of healed wounds will be assessed at 6 months via a telephone survey
About 15% to 30% of patients with venous leg ulcers have a peripheral arterial disease (PAD) associated. The compression band is still a controversial issue in this context. It allows the reduction of venous hypertension and edema, but it could potentially degrade the arterial infusion of high levels of compression. The French High Authority for Health (HAS) defines mixed ulcers by IPS between 0.5 and 0.9. Investigators distinguish mixed ulcers blood predominance for IPS between 0.5 and 0.7; and mixed ulcers predominantly venous blood with moderate involvement for IPS values between 0.7 and 0.9. Several studies have shown that IPS> 0.8 allowed a high compression, between 30 and 40 mmHg. In the case of mixed ulcers with IPS between 0.6 and 0.8, the HAS recommends using a lighter compression, bit by elastic bands (exercising low power compression at rest) under medical supervision, informing the patient to remove the bandage if pain or aggravation. It is therefore necessary to adapt the compression therapy in case of venous ulcers associated with arterial disease by providing a lower compression 30 mmHg short stretch. For HAS, IPS <0.6 against indicates compression. A recent study showed that compression bit elastic bands could not only improve venous return, but it would also increase the distal arterial flow in a patient population with mixed ulcers. In this study, 25 patients had between IPS 0.5 and 0.8; or for certain patients below the threshold of 0.6 indicates that against a compression according to HAS. To our knowledge this is the only study that has examined the effect of compression on blood perfusion.