View clinical trials related to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Filter by:This is a 2-arm, double-blind, parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study, with 12 weeks of therapy to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DLBS3233 in improving metabolic control in newly diagnosed type-2-diabetic patients, as measured by A1c level, fasting and 2-hours post-prandial plasma glucose, fasting insulin level, HOMA-IR, HOMA-B, adiponectin level, lipid profile, and body weight.
The purpose of this study is to examine if once-weekly dulaglutide is efficient and safe compared to glimepiride in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have inadequate glycemic control with oral antihyperglycemic medication (OAM) or are OAM-naïve.
- Rationale: Treatment with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) has been shown to reduce plasma glucose levels to a further extent when added to standard therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Given the well-known beneficial effects of GLP-1 analogues on glucose metabolism by stimulating insulin release, suppressing elevated glucagon levels, delaying gastric emptying and reducing food intake, it is anticipated that liraglutide developed by Novo Nordisk (Victoza®) also has beneficial effects in type 2 diabetes mellitus as has been proven by several trials. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with obesity and sedentary lifestyle. Obesity occurs when energy intake exceeds energy expenditure (EE) over a period of time. It has been presumed that activity energy expenditure and daily energy expenditure are lower in most people in Western societies. Increasing non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT), defined as all energy expended due to everyday activity, exclusive of volitional exercise, may be an effective way to maintain daily EE and combat overweight and obesity. One way to promote NEAT is to decrease the amount of time spent on sedentary behaviors (e.g. watching television). This leads us to hypothesize that adding NEAT to GLP-1 analogues in type 2 diabetes has an additive effect on glucose regulation, weight control and blood pressure. On the other hand, we hypothesize that a decrease in HbA1c, weight and blood pressure could add to an improved quality of life and less health care costs. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study is to determine the synergistic effect of liraglutide and activating lifestyle by increasing NEAT on glucose metabolism and weight. First line therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus currently consists of lifestyle changes with metformin. When failure of this regime occurs, sulfonylurea derivates and/or thiazolidinediones can be added. One third of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus fail with this regimen after 5 years of monotherapy, and nowadays GLP-1 analogues can be added to prevent deterioration of glycaemic control. However, comparison of this strategy with NEAT has not been performed and the synergistic effect of combination of GLP-1 with increasing NEAT has not been investigated. Treatment with GLP-1 analogues in combination with NEAT could theoretically overcome all shortcomings of current treatment strategies of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Objective: - Primary objectives - To determine the change in HbA1c from baseline and end of treatment (26 weeks) and end of follow-up (52 weeks) after 26 weeks of treatment with liraglutide versus liraglutide with NEAT - To determine the change in weight from baseline and end of treatment (26 weeks) and end of follow-up (52 weeks) after 26 weeks of treatment with liraglutide versus liraglutide with NEAT - Secondary objectives - To assess the change in blood pressure from baseline and end of treatment (26 weeks) and end of follow-up (52 weeks) after 26 weeks of treatment with liraglutide versus liraglutide with NEAT - To assess the change in quality of life from baseline and end of treatment (26 weeks) and end of follow-up (52 weeks) after 26 weeks of treatment with liraglutide versus liraglutide with NEAT - To assess the change in NEAT from baseline and end of treatment (26 weeks) and end of follow-up (52 weeks) after 26 weeks of treatment with liraglutide versus liraglutide with NEAT - To asses the health-care related costs at baseline, after 26 weeks of treatment with liraglutide versus liraglutide with NEAT, and after 52 weeks (end of follow-up) Study design: Randomized controlled intervention study - Study population: Men and women with type 2 diabetes mellitus, insufficiënt glycaemic control during maximum (tolerable) dose monotherapy with metformin or a sulfonylurea derivate or during combination therapy with metformin and a sulfonylurea derivate or a thiazolinedione, HbA1c above 7,0%, age between 40 - 75 years old, BMI above 25 kg/m2 Intervention: One group receives once daily subcutaneously liraglutide 1.8mg added to standard anti-diabetic care and the other group receives once daily subcutaneously liraglutide 1.8mg added to standard anti-diabetic care and an activating lifestyle by increasing NEAT Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter is the percent change in HbA1c and weight. Secondary study parameters are change in blood pressure, quality of life as measured using EQ-5D and SF-36 questionnaire, NEAT as measured using an activPAL™ accelerometer and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Primary Objective: - To assess the effects on glycemic control of lixisenatide in comparison to placebo as an add-on treatment to basal insulin with or without metformin in terms of HbA1c reduction over a period of 24 weeks in insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetic patients. Secondary Objectives: - To assess the effects of lixisenatide over 24 weeks on : - percentage of patients reaching HbA1c<7% or ≤6.5%, - 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) and plasma glucose (PG) excursions during standardized meal challenge test, - fasting plasma glucose (FPG), - change in 7-point self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) profile), - body weight, - change in daily basal insulin dose. - To assess lixisenatide safety and tolerability. - To assess anti-lixisenatide antibody development.
Primary Objective: - To evaluate the decrease of Hb A1c ≥ 1% after 6 month treatment in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) uncontrolled on Oral Antidiabetics (OADs) Secondary Objectives: - To evaluate the percentage of patients with Hb A1c < 7.5%, - To evaluate the rate of hypoglycaemia (symptomatic, severe) - To evaluate the middle dose of insulin per product - Insuman Basal, Insuman Comb, Insuman Rapid after 6 month treatment - To evaluate the change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) after 6 month treatment - To assess the overall safety - To evaluate the efficacy of education courses in Diabetes Schools (% of correct answers after second test compare to the testing of the initial level)
The purpose of this study is to the determine the effect of salt intake and Captopril on the ophthalmic artery (OA) blood supply of individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
It is hypothesized for this study that the coupling of the Millon Behavioral Medicine Diagnostic, biopsychosocial evaluation, motivational interviewing, relapse prevention, and ongoing support can produce improved outcomes with diabetics who have previously been unsuccessful with the traditional care. This study examined the relationship between patients' HbA1c levels and patients' involvement in the ASMART program, a multifaceted program involving psychological intervention. The study was conducted through the Kosciusko Health Department and funded by K21 Health Foundation.
The purpose of this study is to assess the multiple rising dose safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics of MK-5823 in overweight/obese participants who are healthy and overweight/obese participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
This study aims to assess how glimepiride affects the recovery from hypoglycemia in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The primary objective is to estimate the time taken by participants to recover from hypoglycemia to euglycemia after treatment with either 2 mg or 4 mg of glimepiride when compared to placebo.
In this prospective, non interventional, observational Post Marketing Survelliance study data are obtained on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Glucobay treatment on top of sulfonylurea under daily life treatment conditions.Specifically investigated is the influence of Glucobay on Post Prandial Blood Glucose and HbA1c as well as on pateint's weight when added to an already existing sulfonylurea therapy.The study is planned to carried out in 25000 - 30000 patients from 200 trial sites in India.The Post Marketing Survelliance study will be performed with commercially available medication prescribed within regular practice of the physician. No other examination will be performed than would be done without Post Marketing Survelliance study.