Trial of Early Initiation of CGM-Guided Insulin Therapy in Stage 2 T1D

Type 1 Diabetes Clinical Trial

— TESS  

Official title:

Trial of Early Initiation of CGM-Guided Insulin Therapy in Stage 2 T1D

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Enrolling by invitation

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04335513
• Other study ID #: 19-1767
• Status: Enrolling by invitation
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 30, 2020
• Est. completion date: July 31, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: May 2022
• Source: University of Colorado, Denver
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This protocol is an intervention study to determine the best education and monitoring strategy for children ages 2-20 years with pre-symptomatic type 1 diabetes (T1D) because there currently exists no clinical guidelines for management of these children in early-stage T1D. This study hypothesizes that the trajectory of T1D can be changed, substantially reducing HbA1c and risk of DKA at diagnosis, through (1) careful monitoring of children progressing from stage 2 to stage 3 T1D using continuous glucose monitor (CGM) technology, (2) staged education targeted to assist families in recognizing evolving dysglycemia, and (3) addressing glycemic abnormalities with early initiation of insulin.

Description:

Specific Aims:

Perform randomized controlled trial of intensive follow-up of stage 2 T1D participants utilizing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology and early education of families to guide early insulin therapy with the goals of:

maintaining HbA1c less than 7.0%. avoiding adverse outcomes: ER visits, hospitalizations, DKA and severe hypoglycemia improving diabetes knowledge through optimal planned education as opposed to 'a crash course' at unexpected diagnosis event.

evaluating patient/caregiver satisfaction with diabetes care received evaluating impact of activity on glycemic profile Collect longitudinal biomarkers of beta-cell stress and dysfunction in stage 2 T1D.

Use longitudinal CGM data combined with "gold-standard" OGTT and HbA1c measures to provide evidence for CGM-based diagnostic criteria for stage 2 and stage 3 T1D.

Perform cost-analysis of intensive follow up protocol.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Enrolling by invitation
• Enrollment: 84
• Est. completion date: July 31, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: July 31, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 2 Years to 20 Years

Eligibility

1. Individuals identified in stage 2 T1D through ongoing screening studies at the Barbara Davis Center (ASK, DAISY, TrialNet, and TEDDY) who have given permission to be contacted about study opportunities.

2. Presence of islet autoimmunity with high risk of progression:

i. positive for multiple islet autoantibodies at 2 or more visits -OR- ii. positive for a single high-affinity islet autoantibody at 2 or more visits

3. Evidence of dysglycemia (Stage 2 T1D) using any one of the following criteria:

I. Americal Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria:

1. fasting plasma glucose 100-125 mg/dL

2. OR 2-hour OGTT plasma glucose of 140-199 mg/dL

3. OR A1c 5.7-6.4%

4. OR =10% increase in A1c from previous visit

II. Dysglycemia on OGTT (TrialNet Criteria):

a. glucose above 200 mg/dL on 30, 60 OR 90 minute values

III. Dysglycemia on CGM worn for at least 5 days:

1. =15% of values above 140 mg/dL

2. OR peaks = 200 mg/dL on =2 days

3. OR average sensor glucose =120 mg/dL

IV. Dysglycemia on finger stick blood glucose:

1. Fasting BG above 110 mg/dL on 2 or more days

2. OR 2 hour post-meal BG above 150 mg/dL on = 2 days

3. OR single random BG > 200 mg/dL

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Autoimmune Diabetes
• Diabetes Mellitus
• Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
• Dysglycemia
• Prediabetic State
• Type 1 Diabetes

Intervention

Other:
• Early CGM-guided education and initiation of insulin therapy.
Careful monitoring of children progressing from stage 2 to stage 3 T1D using continuous glucose monitor (CGM) technology, staged education targeted to assist families in recognizing evolving dysglycemia, and addressing glycemic abnormalities with early initiation of insulin can substantially reduce the HbA1c and risk of DKA at diagnosis, thereby changing the trajectory of the disease course.
• Usual care: glucometer surveillance and basic education.
Usual education and advice on glycemic surveillance based on protocols of TEDDY/DAISY/ASK. Blinded CGM for 10 days every 3 months to collect data on glycemic profile with basic feedback regarding changes.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Barbara Davis Center	Aurora	Colorado

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Colorado, Denver	The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Activity Monitoring daily steps	Activity tracker average of steps per day from at least 5 days of data at each time point. Average daily steps will be analyzed using linear mixed models incorporating data from all seven time points, with an interaction between group and time to test for differences in change in outcome over time. Contrast statements will be used to test for comparisons of interest (intervention vs controls).	Monthly for months 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of study
Other	Parental anxiety regarding diabetes risk	Items from a questionnaire to study the psychological impact of diabetes risk. A 6-item short form of the state portion of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) will be used to assess parent anxiety about the child's diabetes risk at a single point in time. For example, parents were asked how often they feel "worried" specifically when they think about their child's risk of developing diabetes. Responses were scored on a 4-point scale and the 6-item score was then converted to a total score comparable to the 20-item State Anxiety Inventory score. Parents with STAI scores > 40 were considered to be highly anxious. STAI scores will be analyzed using linear mixed models incorporating data from all three time points, with an interaction between group and time to test for differences in change in outcome over time. Contrast statements will be used to test for comparisons of intervention vs controls.	Baseline, 6 and 12 months
Other	Parental depression symptoms.	Items from a questionnaire to study the psychological impact of diabetes risk. A 6-item set of questions quering frequency of depressive symptoms will be used to assess parent depressive symptoms at a single point in time. For example, parents will be asked about frequency of crying spells on a 4 point scale from (1) Not at all to (4) All of the time. Responses are scored from 6 to 24, with higher score indicating increased depressive symptoms.	Baseline, 6 and 12 months
Other	Parental perception of ability to impact diabetes risk.	Items from a questionnaire to study the psychological impact of diabetes risk. A 3 item survey, each item answered on a likert scale from 1-5: (1) strongly agree to (5) strongly disagree. Risk modification belief scoring is scored on 3-15 points with higher score indicating perception that risk of diabetes can be modified. Risk modification scores will be analyzed using linear mixed models incorporating data from all three time points, with an interaction between group and time to test for differences in change in outcome over time. Contrast statements will be used to test for comparisons of intervention vs control	Baseline, 6 and 12 months
Other	Accuracy of parental risk perception.	Items from a questionnaire to study the psychological impact of diabetes risk. The accuracy of parental perception of the child's risk for developing type 1 diabetes (T1D) is scored as accurate or inaccurate on a questionnaire (accurate: indicating the child's T1D risk was higher or much higher than other children's T1D risk; inaccurate: indicating the child's T1D risk was the same, somewhat lower or much lower than other children's T1D risk).	Baseline, 6 and 12 months
Other	Parental worry regarding diabetes risk.	Item from a questionnaire to study the psychological impact of diabetes risk. The frequency of worry regarding whether the child will develop diabetes is scored on a five item scale from (1) Never to (5) Very often. A score of 5 indicates increased level of worry.	Baseline, 6 and 12 months
Other	Change in height over time	Change in z-score of height, using CDC (Centers for Disease Control) standards for gender and age.	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Other	Change in weight over time	Change in z-score of weight, using CDC standards for gender and age.	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Other	Change in BMI over time	Change in z-score of BMI using CDC standards for gender and age.	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Other	Change in body fat over time	Change in body fat percentile using Tanita bioelectrical impedance scale	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Other	Presence of one or more islet cell autoantibodies:over time	islet autoantibodies measured in the blood: GAD65 autoantibody (GADA), islet antigen 2 autoantibody (IA-2A), insulin autoantibody (IAA), and zinc transporter 8 autoantibody (ZnT8A)	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Other	Change in glucose tolerance over time by Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)	Abnormal glucose tolerance is defined as: Fasting plasma glucose = 110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L) and < 126 mg/dL (7 mmol/L), or 2 hour plasma glucose = 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) and < 200 (11.1 mmol/L), or 30, 60, 90 minute plasma glucose during OGTT = 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L); OGTT values diagnostic of diabetes is defined as: Fasting plasma glucose >126 mg/dL (7 mmol/L), or 2 hour plasma glucose >200 (11.1 mmol/L),	Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Other	Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) % time <60 mg/dL	Data obtained for Dexcom G6 wear with at least 5 days of data.	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Other	areal bone mineral density of the spine measured by osteodensitometry (DXA)	Measured in g/cm2 by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)	3 and 9 month visits
Other	areal bone mineral density of the proximal femur measured by osteodensitometry (DXA)	Measured in g/cm2 by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)	3 and 9 month visits
Other	Change in glycemic control over time	1,5 anhydroglucitol	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Other	Insulin requirements	total, basal and bolus insulin dose (Units/kg/day), both arms	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Other	Severe hypoglycemic episodes	frequency of severe hypoglycemic episodes (BG < 54 mg/dL)	12 months
Other	diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) episodes	frequency of DKA	12 months
Other	ER visits and hospitalizations related to glycemia	frequency of ER/Hospitalizations	12 months
Other	Adverse events	number, nature and severity of other adverse events	12 months
Other	Assessment of frequency of use of CGM (continuous glucose monitor) system	Number of days using CGM	12 months
Other	Change in Diabetes Knowledge from 6 month to 12 months follow-up.	35-item diabetes questionnaire with possible responses true/false/don't know. Total score is the number of correct answers out of 35, with more correct answers indicating higher knowledge. Durability of knowledge from 6-month follow-up to 12 month follow-up will be compared between groups	6 months to 12 months follow-up
Primary	Change in Diabetes Knowledge from baseline to 6 month follow-up.	35-item diabetes questionnaire with possible responses true/false/don't know. Total score is the number of correct answers out of 35, with more correct answers indicating higher knowledge. Change from baseline to 6-month follow-up will be compared between groups	Baseline, 6 months
Primary	Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) % time >140 mg/dL	Data obtained for Dexcom G6 wear with at least 5 days of data at each time point. Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) % time >140 mg/dL will be analyzed using linear mixed models incorporating data from all 5 time points, with an interaction between group and time to test for differences in change in outcome over time. Contrast statements will be used to test for comparisons of intervention vs controls.	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Secondary	Change in HbA1c	HbA1c from baseline to 52 weeks, adjusted for baseline	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Secondary	% with HbA1c <7.0%	Percentage of individuals in each group with HbA1c <7.0%	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Secondary	Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) % time in range 60-140 mg/dL	Data obtained for Dexcom G6 wear with at least 5 days of data.	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Secondary	Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) mean sensor glucose level (mg/dL)	Data obtained for Dexcom G6 wear with at least 5 days of data.	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Secondary	Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) standard deviation sensor glucose level (mg/dL)	Data obtained for Dexcom G6 wear with at least 5 days of data.	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Secondary	Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) coefficient of variation sensor glucose level (mg/dL)	Data obtained for Dexcom G6 wear with at least 5 days of data.	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Secondary	Change in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0) score over time	The PedsQL 4.0 measures health-related quality of life across the domains of Physical Functioning, Emotional Functioning, Social Functioning, and School Functioning.; ThePedsQL has parallel forms for parents of children aged 2-4, 5-7, 8-12, and 13-18 years. The child version has parallel forms for children aged 5-7, 8-12, and 13-18. Responses to items use a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never a problem, 4 = almost always a problem). Items are reverse scored and transformed to a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better quality of life.	Baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Secondary	Change in C-peptide response to Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)	C-peptide measurement during standard OGTT, Area under the curve (AUC)	Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Secondary	Change in insulin response to Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)	insulin measurement during standard OGTT, Area under the curve (AUC)	Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Secondary	Diabetes attitude survey change over time	10 item survey, each item answered on a likert scale from 1-5: (1) strongly disagree to (5) strongly agree. Scoring is on 4 scales: (1) "Value of Tight Control", scored on 4-20 points with higher score indicating agreement with importance of control; (2) "Psychosocial Impact", scored on 2-10 points with higher score indicating agreement with high impact of diabetes on psychosocial factors; (3) "Patient Autonomy", scored on 2-10 points with higher score indicating agreement with value of autonomy; and (4) "Confidence", scored on 2-10 points with higher score indicating confidence in knowledge and skills.	Baseline, 6 months, 12 months