Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03042754 |
Other study ID # |
TB NRU |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
June 6, 2011 |
Est. completion date |
December 1, 2030 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2024 |
Source |
The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Early diagnosis can contribute to good treatment outcomes and isolate infection control.
Description:
This study is conducted into 2 parts: prospective and retrospective.
The prospective study evaluated the use of Xpert MTB/RIF. The study was conducted at three
large tertiary care hospitals: the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Rajavithi Hospital
and Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute. Only pulmonologists and infectious disease
physicians with extensive experience in TB participated in the study. Patients who had
suspected PTB were enrolled into the study. Expectorated sputum were collected and
transferred to the central laboratory, Chulalongkorn Research Center (CRC) Laboratory, King
Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Each sample was divided into two parts; one part for the
Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid) and another part for mycobacterial culture. Drug susceptibility tests
for streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol were performed with rapid qualitative
procedure (BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960 SIRE Kit) and semi-automated system (BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960 System).
Discordant results of MGIT and Xpert were retested with the rpoB gene sequencing system. All
PTB patients were promptly treated with anti-TB drug regimens as WHO's recommendation. All
patients had HIV testing done and CD4 cell counts were obtained for all HIV-infected
patients. Antiretroviral treatment and prophylaxis for opportunistic infections were
prescribed as standard treatment guideline for patients with HIV/TB co-infection. The
patients were followed until completion of TB treatment or change in the diagnosis. The WHO
definitions for cure, completed treatment, dead, default or treatment failure were used to
define the outcome of treatment.
The authors , therefore, evaluated the utility of Xpert MTB/RIF in Thailand, prior to
nation-wide implementation. In summary, our real-life cohort study use Xpert MTB/RIF for
early diagnosis of PTB and rifampicin resistance in high TB burden country outside of the
African region. The results may be beneficial for guiding the policy makers, especially the
National Tuberculosis Programme (NTP) to control TB transmission, as the country move towards
universal use of Xpert MTB/RIF.
The retrospective study assessed the urine LAM test which has not been evaluated in
non-HIV-infected immunocompromised Asians with disseminated TB and non-disseminated TB (TB
located in one organ) but has a poor sensitivity and specificity for detecting pulmonary TB
patients without HIV infection. On that account, the authors evaluated the applicability and
efficacy of TB diagnosis by using the urine from confirmed cultured TB cases with various
immune response conditions, such as HIV-infected, non-HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected
immunocompromised patients. The authors found that the sensitivity of the urine LAM in
HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected patients were similar to previous reports. This confirmed
that the urine LAM cannot be used alone to screen for TB. However, it can be used in
conjunction with the culture and AFB smear test for patients co-infected with HIV with very
low CD4 count. The urine LAM test is especially helpful in cases where the smear is negative
in probable-TB patients. For this reason, the urine LAM test is attractive because it is not
invasive, and the samples needed can be easily collected from these types of disseminated
patients with and without HIV.
Aside from that, the urine LAM test can be used in those severely ill patients, regardless of
HIV infection, where it is difficult to physically collect the sputum and paucibacillary
samples. The PPV was over 80% for those infected with HIV and up to 100% in non-HIV-infected
patients. For physicians, the PPV is more useful than the sensitivity and specificity of the
assay because it will answer the question how likely the patient with a positive result from
the urine LAM test will have TB or not. A high PPV can accurately guide the physicians to
confidentially prescribe the TB medications which are crucial, especially among co-infected
patients that are severely ill. For this reason, the urine LAM test seems to be a great
point-of-care test that can easily be incorporated with the AFB smear and culture test for
the Asian population. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that a positive urine LAM test
result was significantly associated with death, especially those with HIV infection. This
association is much stronger in patients with very low CD4 counts. The findings from this
study suggest the possible use of the urine LAM test with the AFB smear and culture in
resource-limited countries in diagnosing TB in advanced HIV and non-HIV-infected patients
with TB. This promising diagnostic tool can increase the yield of TB diagnosis and predict
the mortality rate of TB infection, particularly in advanced HIV patients.