View clinical trials related to Tuberculosis, Pulmonary.
Filter by:Tuberculosis (TB) is a global pandemic that despite successful treatment and bacterial eradication can cause chronic ill health, also known as pulmonary impairment after tuberculosis (PIAT). A recent Phase 2b double-blind randomised-controlled clinical trial shows that adjunctive doxycycline therapy along with standard pulmonary TB (PTB) treatment is safe, accelerates resolution of inflammation, suppresses tissue damaging enzyme activity and decreases pulmonary cavity volume (1). The investigators aim to determine if adjunctive doxycycline can reduce PIAT in a fully powered Phase III trial of 8 weeks of adjunctive doxycycline alongside standard pulmonary TB treatment. The investigators hypothesize that doxycycline inhibits tissue destruction in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and thereby leads to improved lung function after treatment. Specific aims 1. To assess for improvement in lung function as measured by forced expiratory volume (FEV1) predicted in PTB patients given doxycycline versus placebo. 2. To investigate whether doxycycline will hasten the resolution of pulmonary cavities measured by CT thorax, suppress inflammatory markers including matrix metalloproteinases and accelerate time to sputum culture conversion. 3. To assess the safety profile of doxycycline with concurrent standard anti-tuberculous treatment.
To evaluate the 7-day early bactericidal activity (EBA), pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of ethionamide (Eto) with or without BVL-GSK098 in participants with rifampicin- and isoniazid-susceptible pulmonary TB.
This study is proposed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the RUTI vaccine in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Therapeutic vaccination of RUTI would stimulate the immune response not only against growing bacteria, but also against bacteria in a latent state that are less sensitive to antibiotic treatments. Therapeutic vaccination in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis could improve the speed of recovery of patients without inducing the appearance of drug resistance.
This study is a clinical trial conducted to determine whether the sitafloxacin-containing three-month regimens are as effective as the standard six-month regimen and the four-month rifapentine and moxifloxacin regimen (substitution of rifapentine for rifampin and moxifloxacin for ethambutol) for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. The standard six-month regimen is two months of isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide, followed by four months of isoniazid and rifampin. The four-month regimen consists of two months of isoniazid, rifapentine, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide, followed by two months of isoniazid rifapentine and moxifloxacin. The new three-month tuberculosis treatment regimens are six weeks of isoniazid, rifapentine, Sitafloxacin, and pyrazinamide, followed by seven weeks of isoniazid, rifapentine, and Sitafloxacin, or 13 weeks of isoniazid, rifapentine, Sitafloxacin, and pyrazinamide. The primary research question is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the 3 month Sitafloxacin-containing regimen, and to determine if it can shorten the treatment of drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis while achieving non-inferiority in treatment success with the current 6 month and 4 month treatment regimens. Safety, side effects of Sitafloxacin for participants in the clinical trial are also assessed. Rates of cure, treatment success, recurrence, and cure (cure without recurrence) are determined for subgroup analysis in the standard six-month regimen group, the four-month regimen group, and two three-month regimen groups.
Tuberculosis (TB) remains the most important infectious disease in the world. A major barrier to tuberculosis control is poor adherence to long-term and complex treatment regimens. This is a multicenter prospective, non-inferiority randomized controlled study. The purpose of our study is a) to evaluate the tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of the high-dose rifapentine, b) to evaluate whether the high-dose rifapentine-containing regimen has the potential to treat the rifampicin-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis and shorten the course of treatment to 17 weeks. This study is of great significance for shortening the course of treatment, reducing the adverse reactions and economic burden of patients' treatment in rifampicin-sensitive tuberculosis patient.
To evaluate the 2-week bactericidal activity, pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of sanfetrinem cilexetil in participants with rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis.
This study aims to measure the early bactericidal activity (EBA), safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics with GSK3036656 in combination with either delamanid or bedaquiline or BTZ-043, delamanid in combination with bedaquiline or standard of care for 14 days in participants with newly diagnosed sputum smear positive drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis. Participants will revert to the standard treatment (RIFAFOUR® e-275) once the study treatment (Day 1 to Day 14) has been completed.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the complex therapy of drug-resistant respiratory tuberculosis using the drug Ingaron, a lyophilisate for the preparation of a solution for injection for intramuscular or subcutaneous administration of 500,000 IU.
This study aims to describe the long-term adverse outcomes associated with PTB in children, to describe the evolution of these sequelae, and to determine the epidemiological risk factors associated with these sequelae. The investigators will conduct a prospective cohort study. Children who have completed treatment for PTB will be enrolled. The study visit will be performed in the study clinic, where clinical assessment, spirometry and radiography will be performed. The planned duration of the study is 36 months. Participant enrolment is estimated to begin in March 2022. The estimated date of the last participant enrolled is December 2022.
This five-year study will evaluate two strategies for conducting tuberculosis (TB) active case finding (ACF) and linkage to TB treatment or TB preventive therapy (TPT) in peri-urban Uganda. The two strategies differ in the location where ACF activities are performed: A "facility-based" ACF/TPT strategy will perform ACF, plus linkage to TPT, in the immediate vicinity of a large public health facility and will primarily recruit individuals who are attending the health facility, irrespective of TB suspicion or symptoms. Alternatively, a "hotspot-based" strategy will use routine notification data and local expertise to identify local TB hotspots - defined as the geographic areas though to have the highest burden of undiagnosed TB per estimated population. The same infrastructure (personnel, equipment, supplies, etc.) for ACF/TPT will then be placed in those zones for a period of four months at a time, and the general population will be recruited for screening and linkage to TPT. The two interventions will be compared in a Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial with a cluster-randomized, multiple-period crossover design. The study will evaluate whether hotspot-focused ACF/TPT results in a greater number of TB patients diagnosed and linked to care, and a greater number of individuals started on preventive therapy, than facility-based ACF/TPT. Secondarily, it will also compare the two interventions in terms of number of people initiated on TPT, and it will compare TB cases detected in regions performing ACF/TPT (either approach) against cases detected in regions that continue to perform the standard of care.