View clinical trials related to Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial.
Filter by:The current study aims to examine the potential effects of rolling a Myostorm ball on the trigger points in the upper back muscles.
This is an observational study that is intended to determine the capacity of three technologies to serve as diagnostic biomarkers for myofascial pain syndrome. Investigators will seek patients with myofasical pain syndrome as well as healthy subjects for this study. Electrical impedance myography (EIM), myofiber threshold tracking (TT) excitability testing, and ultrasound with shear wave elastography (SWE) measurements will be obtained from the trapezius muscle (the muscle that extends over the back of the neck and shoulders). These measurements will be repeated within 2-5 days to assess repeatability of these methods.
In this study, it will be assessed if there are changes in ankle dorsiflexion and pressure pain after performing the myofascial induction technique in the calf.
The purpose of the stud will be to compare the effect of pressure release with thoracic spine manipulation on pain intensity level and pain pressure threshold, thoracic spine ROM and physical function onactive rhomboids muscle trigger point in myofascial pain syndrome.
Case series, repeated-measures design, pilot study. Adult, female, migraine patients underwent seven Ischemic Compression Myofascial Trigger Points (IC-MTrPs) therapy sessions. The aim of the study is to investigate whether therapy of the shoulder girdle and neck muscles by deactivating MTrPs causes modification of biomechanical and biochemical variables in the blood and reduces headache in people with migraine, improving their quality of life by improving their health. People qualified for the study were divided into 3 groups according to the type of migraine: 1. CM group - patients with chronic migraine 2. EMa group - patients with paroxysmal migraine with aura 3. EMb group - patients with paroxysmal migraine without an aura. All patients underwent 7 interventions in the area of the muscles of the shoulder girdle and neck (by deactivating trigger points) performed every 2 or 3 days. They did not take any headache medications during the treatment period. However, during a migraine attack, they could undergo treatments and research measurements. Biomechanical measurements of the cervical spine, shoulder girdle muscles and blood chemistry were performed before, during and after the patients' therapy. All treatments were performed on the following muscles: - m. trapesius pars descendent (trapezius upper), - m. sternocleidomastoideus (sternocleidomastoid), - m. temporalis (temporal), - m. legator scapulae (levator scapula), - m. supraspinatus (supraspinatus), - m. suboccipitales (suboccipital).
The association between lumbosacral radiculopathy and the ipsilateral gluteal trigger point has been demonstrated in 74% of previous studies in patients with chronic low back pain. It has also been found to be associated with lumbosacral radiculopathy, central sensitization and myofascial pain in previous studies. From these data, it can be hypothesized that the presence of a myofascial trigger point in the relevant muscle segment may alter the efficacy of the transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) procedure used in the treatment of lumbosacral radiculopathy. We could not find any study on this subject in the literature. Although the most accurate level for the TFESI procedure is determined according to the patient's examination and imaging findings, patients may not benefit from the procedure sufficiently due to the trigger points on the same side as the radicular pain before the procedure. Another hypothesis is that active trigger points will transform into latent or normal tissue after the TFESI procedure and patients will benefit significantly. This assumption will provide insight into the possible underlying mechanism in some patients who do not benefit from the TFESI procedure. If the active trigger points become latent or there is a significant change in the pressure pain threshold after the TFESI procedure, the formation mechanism of the trigger points will be understood. TFESI is one of the procedures routinely applied to patients diagnosed with lumbosacral radiculopathy in investigator's clinic. Among the patients who are planned to undergo TFESI procedure, those who are suitable for our study will be selected. Data such as demographic characteristics, height, weight, which leg the pain is reflected in, additional diseases, medications, the stage of the disc herniation, pressure on which nerve root, presence and number of active trigger points, muscles will be recorded before the procedure. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Short Form-12, Central Sensitivity Inventory (CSI), Doulour Neuropathic 4 (DN4), 6-point Likert Scale, Jenkins Sleep Scale, Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability Index, Pressure Pain Threshold (active trigger points will be evaluated with an algometer) will be applied to the patients before the procedure. The patients will be evaluated for the presence of active trigger points before the procedure and the patients will be divided into 2 groups as those with active trigger points and those without. The same procedure will be applied to both groups as planned before inclusion of the patients in the study, in the same way as the patients ineligible for the study. Patients will be re-evaluated with the scales and methods mentioned above at the 3rd week, 3rd and 6th months after the first procedure. TFESI procedure will be performed again in the 3rd week and 3rd month for the patients whose NRS values decrease less than 50 percent after the previous procedure.
The aim of this research is to compare the effect of integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique and myofascial release on pain, pain pressure threshold and shoulder disability in patients with rhomboid muscle. Randomized controlled trials will be done at Benazir Bhutto Hospital. The sample size is 32. The subjects will be divided in two groups, 16 subjects in integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique group and 16 in myofascial release group. Study duration will be of 6 months. Sampling technique applied will be non-probability purposive sampling technique. Only 25-45 years patients with shoulder/mid back pain and the presence of atleast one trigger point in rhomboid muscles will be included. Tools used in the study are algometer, shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) and Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Data will be analyzed through SPSS 21.
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is present in up to 87% of the patients that present pain. MPS usually presents painful myofascial trigger points (MTrPs). One methodology used to quantify the pain in MPS is the algometry, which measures the pressure pain threshold (PPT). Invasive techniques in physiotherapy have become popular in the last years due to their clinical efficacy and evidence. Percutaneous Microelectrolysis (MEP®) and dry needling are techniques that are already in use for this syndrome. MEP® is a technique that employs a galvanic current up to 990 microAmperes, which is applied percutaneously with an acupuncture needle connected to the cathode. It is also known as low intensity percutaneous electrolysis. The aim of this study is to compare the effects in pain and muscle tone (measured with algometry and surface electromyography) of invasive techniques. Healthy subjects between 18 to 48 years old, both sex, presenting MTrPs in upper trapezius will be recruited. The secondary objectives are to determine the discomfort degree of each technique and if it is better to use MEP® with a fixed dose or with an algorithm in which the dose varies. The hypothesis, according to our previous studies, is that MEP® generates higher changes in PPT.
to investigate the effects of Magnesium Sulphate Iontophoresis versus High Power Pain Threshold Ultrasound on pain, function and range of motion on active MTrPs found in the upper trapezius.
Non-specific low back pain can be caused by the presence of active trigger points in the muscles of the lumbopelvic region. Trigger points are defined as hypersensitive points within a taut band of a musculoskeletal system that cause pain during contraction, stretching, or stimulation of said muscle. If these points are active, they can trigger referred pain, local tenderness, and vegetative responses. There is scientific evidence of the improvement of the treatment of these points through non-invasive manual techniques. The objective of this study will be to determine the effect of Strain Counterstrain and Myofascial Induction techniques in subjects with low back pain secondary to the presence of active trigger points in the lumbopelvic region. Hyperexcitable myofascial trigger points located within a taut band of skeletal muscle or fascia cause referred pain, local tenderness, and autonomic changes. The scientific data refer to an immediate improvement in the symptoms of these active points treated with manual therapy. Based on these factors, the objective of the study is to determine the effect of the combined therapy of the Strain Counterstrain technique and Myofascial Induction in participants with the presence of an active trigger point in the erector spinae muscle.