Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Trigger finger is a common condition of the hand caused by the thickening of the A1 pulley or flexor tendon that alters the way in which the flexor tendon glides within the tendon sheath. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of excision versus incision of the A1 pulley for the trigger finger. Researchers hypothesize that excision of the A1 pulley would result in lower trigger finger recurrence rates, better pain relief, reduced soreness & stiffness as well as higher final Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement (PROMs). This will be investigated via a randomized controlled study involving patients randomized in either of the aforementioned surgical treatment groups, which are both standards of care, at the Musculoskeletal Institute or at the Emory University Orthopaedic and Spine Hospital. Patients will then follow up in the clinic at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year to assess their outcomes measures stated in the protocol document. All work related to this project will take place at the Emory Sports Medicine Complex, Emory Executive Park, Emory Musculoskeletal Institute, and the Emory University Orthopaedic and Spine Hospital. Patients will not be compensated for participating in this study. Patients who are undergoing trigger finger surgery will be identified by their Orthopaedic surgeon who is a member of the study team. The surgeon will briefly discuss participation with the patient and make clear study expectations.


Clinical Trial Description

Trigger finger is a common condition of the hand that affects up to 2.6% of the adult population over the course of their lifetimes. This prevalence is even higher in patients with diabetes affecting 5-20% of people. The condition is caused by the thickening of the A1 pulley or flexor tendon that alters the way in which the flexor tendon glides within the tendon sheath. While first-line therapy for this condition is conservative treatment through activity modification, bracing, and corticosteroid injections, this fails a reported 20-50% of the time. In cases in which conservative management failure occurs, surgery is the next line of treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of excision versus incision of the A1 pulley for the trigger finger. The research team hypothesizes that excision of the A1 pulley would result in lower trigger finger recurrence rates, better pain relief, reduced soreness & stiffness as well as higher final PROMs. Surgery can be performed either percutaneously or open. Rates of persistent triggering in the percutaneous release group range from 7 to 9%. Additionally, even with open procedures, there is some risk of persistent triggering or symptom recurrence. A study by Everding et al. reported a recurrent triggering rate of 2.6% in their cohort of 795 patients who underwent open trigger finger release. A review of 209,634 patients who underwent trigger digit release from the PearlDiver Database reported a revision rate of 0.4% at 1 year and 0.64% at 3 years. Finally, a retrospective study by Bruijnzeel et al. demonstrated a 0.6% risk of persistent triggering and a 0.3% risk of recurrence in their sample of 1,598 patients. Risk factors for revision include Dupuytren's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, liver, disease, obesity, tobacco use, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and age under 65 years. In cases of recurrence, the procedure can be repeated to release any remaining portion of the A1 pulley, partial release of the A2, or release of the ulnar slip of flexor digitorum superficialis. Two biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the entire A1 pulley and up to 50% of the A2 pulley can be released with minimal risk for bowstringing. There have also been studies assessing the use of different incision types for open procedures and their effects on scar formation. Kazmers et al. compared scar formation from trigger finger release through a transverse skin incision versus a longitudinal incision and found no difference in DASH scores, complication rates, or scar quality metrics in the 61 patients studied. Additionally, a study comparing a transverse incision at the distal palmar crease, a transverse incision 2-3 mm distal to the distal palmar crease, and a longitudinal incision at the level of the A1 pulley demonstrated similar results between the longitudinal incision and the incision 2-3 mm distal to the distal palmar crease with no difference in scar volume as measured by ultrasound. There have been no studies to date assessing the effect of complete A1 pulley resection in comparison to longitudinal release of the A1 pulley. Theoretically, resection of the A1 pulley should reduce the rate of persistent triggering and recurrence and thus result in superior patient outcomes; however, this has yet to be determined. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05251428
Study type Interventional
Source Emory University
Contact Eric Wagner, MD, MS
Phone 404-778-7249
Email eric.r.wagner@emory.edu
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date January 30, 2023
Completion date December 2027

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04094389 - Comparison of Trigger Finger Orthotic Wearing Schedules N/A
Completed NCT05435950 - Clinical Investigation on Safety, Performance and Effectiveness of Sono-instruments N/A
Completed NCT04900220 - Differences in Flare Reaction Incidence and Intensity Following Trigger Finger Injections Phase 4
Completed NCT06401473 - Using the Gate Control Theory of Pain to Decrease Pain During Trigger Finger Corticosteroid Injections N/A
Completed NCT04354415 - Tourniquet vs. No Tourniquet for Carpal Tunnel and Trigger Finger Release N/A
Recruiting NCT06296017 - Effectiveness of Conservative Interventions in the Treatment of Trigger Finger N/A
Completed NCT06288685 - Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Concomitant Steroid Injection Versus Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Alone Phase 3
Completed NCT06382623 - Efficacies of Different Managements in Patients With Trigger Finger
Active, not recruiting NCT04568993 - The TriggerHappy Trial N/A
Completed NCT04023695 - Trigger Finger Corticosteroid Injection With and Without Local Anesthetic Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04645303 - Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Versus Corticosteroid for Treatment of Trigger Finger Early Phase 1
Recruiting NCT03156829 - Effectiveness of Cortisone Injection and Splinting for Trigger Finger Phase 4
Completed NCT01987115 - Comparison of Fascial Manipulation With Traditional Physiotherapy for the Treatment of Trigger Fingers N/A
Completed NCT02196233 - Surgical Treatment of Adult Trigger Finger
Completed NCT01950793 - A Comparison Between Sonoguided Injection Corticosteroid and Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Treatment of Trigger Finger N/A
Recruiting NCT04675892 - Resection of Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Tendon for Severe Trigger Fingers N/A
Terminated NCT05082480 - Evaluate the Effectiveness of Crosslinked HA on the Adhesion Preventing After Trigger Finger Release Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05045157 - Effectiveness of Percutaneous Pulley Release With Infiltration, Versus Infiltration Alone in Trigger Finders N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01886157 - Treatment of Trigger Finger With Steroid Injection Versus Steroid Injection and Splinting N/A
Recruiting NCT00951236 - Study Comparing One Versus Two Cortisone Injections for Trigger Finger N/A