View clinical trials related to Tooth Extraction Status Nos.
Filter by:Bone resorption after a tooth extraction is a generally accepted knowledge and has been demonstrated by many animal and human studies. Especially during the first three months followed by the tooth extraction, the volume of bone may change significantly without any interference. Thus, doing a ridge preservation procedure following the extraction is a common standard of care method to maintain the socket volume if implant placement is considered as a treatment option in the future. A variety of materials and methods have been used for ridge preservation. However, it's still inconclusive to determine the best material to maintain the ridge dimension, especially for membrane placement that allows for space maintenance to protect the grafting material. Furthermore, there is no evidence to show any treatment rationale is superior to any other ridge preservation method. In general, the membrane serves the function of the barrier and space protector. The periodontal surgeon use membranes to exclude the epithelium growth and to limit the collapse of the soft tissue into the healing alveolar socket. Regarding resorbable and non-resorbable membrane materials, both serve the function of protecting the graft material from the oral cavity. However, there are also many demonstrating that without membranes the extraction socket healed nicely without any interferences. The question to us is: Do we need the membrane to exclude the epithelium or any kind of surgical dressing material is sufficient enough to preserve the volume of the extracted ridge? The object of this study is to compare five popular membranes on the market that present different characteristics of the membranes.
Alveolar bone resorption after dental extraction frequently leads to situations in which long-term function and esthetic success of rehabilitations with dental implants is a challenge. "Pontic-shield" has been described as an alternative technique to maintain alveolar ridge after tooth extraction. The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of "Pontic-shield" technique in alveolar ridge preservation comparing to fresh socket and ridge preservation using deproteinized bovine bone and a porcine collagen membrane.
It is unclear what is the best approach to implant site development after tooth extraction when the pathology leading to extraction has damaged the alveolus. The main objective of this study is to assess if socket preservation and/or reconstruction surgery provides a clinical benefit in terms of ability to place an implant in a prosthetically guided position in such clinical conditions. The PICO question therefore is: In patients requiring single tooth extraction what is the benefit of socket preservation/reconstruction surgery with respect to spontaneous healing in terms of feasibility and ease of implant surgery?
After atraumatic tooth extraction and the assessment of the feasibility of immediate implant placement, patients will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment concepts: 1. Immediate Implant Placement and Immediate Provisionalization 2. Alveolar Ridge Preservation. After 4 months of healing an implant will be placed with simultaneous GBR and/or Soft Tissue Augmentation procedures, if needed. 3. Spontaneous Healing of the socket. After 4 months of healing, an implant will be placedwith simultaneous GBR and/or Soft Tissue Augmentation procedures, if needed. In all groups, four months after implant placement, a prosthesis will be delivered. From this experimental period onward, patients will be scheduled for maintenance. Clinical, radiographic and volumetric assessment will be performed by clinicians not involved in the surgery and blind with respect to treatment assignment at 1, 3 and 5 years post loading.
The specific aims of the present study were to evaluate sAA responses to impacted third molar extractions at different time points in the patients under conscious sedation with local anesthesia and to examine the relationship between sAA, conscious sedation and dental anxiety. The null hypothesis was that conscious sedation could be considered to reduce salivary alpha amylase level during the wisdom tooth surgery.
This project aims to evaluate the effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) on the reduction of swelling and postoperative pain in lower molar extraction procedures. This is a clinical study approved by the Research Ethics Committee, which will be performed in 40 patients between 20 and 60 years. Patients included in the study should have at least one lower molar (first or second molar) with indication of exodontia. Participants will follow the exclusion criteria: pregnant or breastfeeding women; patients with obesity (Body Mass Index - BMI); make use of any activity smokers and ex smoker to 6 months; diabetics; immunosuppressed; in osteoporosis; making use of antimicrobials in the last 3 months; making use of medications that interfere with bone remodeling; with cysts or tumors in place. Surgical procedures that exceeded the clinical time of 30 minutes and / or required opening of the flap or osteotomy were excluded from the study. After the sample calculation, forty patients will be involved in this project, where forty molars (first and second molars) will be extracted in the mandible, which will be randomly divided into 4 groups. The control group (C.G), will contain 10 patients, where 10 molars will be extracted in a conventional way, without any additional treatment to be done. Test group 1 (T.G1) will contain 10 patients where 10 molars will be extracted and immediately after extraction, the fresh sockets will receive in their inner portion a local application of aPDT. The test group 2 (T.G2) will present 10 patients, where 10 molars will be extracted that immediately after the exodontia, the fresh socket will receive local application of infrared in the outer vestibular portion. Finally, Test Group 3 (T.G3), will be composed of 10 patients, where 10 molars will be extracted, joining the approaches of the previous groups (aPDT + infrared). Pain intensity will be assessed through a visual analogue scale and swelling assessed by measuring a perimeter between the tragus, the base of the jaw and the commissure of the lips. The data will be collected in four moments: before the surgery, 72 hours, 7 days and 30 days postoperatively.
This prospective study was performed on 82 participants. Severe pain on percussion of the relevant tooth was considered as basic criteria when deciding on acute infection phase. The acutely infected teeth were labeled as the study group (n=35) and the asymptomatic ones as the control group (n=47). The extractions were done in the usual way. Amount of anesthetic solution used and durations of extractions were recorded.
Surgical extraction of third molars is one of the most common outpatient procedures performed by oral surgeons. The prescription of postoperative narcotic and NSAID analgesics is the standard of care practice to relieve symptoms of pain, swelling, and trismus after these procedures. The majority of these patients do not return for follow up unless they experience a problem. There is limited data on whether the patients use the narcotics as directed and what is their practice of disposal of the remaining medications that were not consumed. In this research the effectiveness of postop analgesic consumption, analgesic disposal practice, pain control, and patient satisfaction will be compared between patients who are randomized to the intervention group who will use a developed mobile application and a control group who will not use the mobile app.
Background: Overdose deaths from prescription opioid analgesics quadrupled from 4,000 cases to nearly 17,000 cases annually during 1999-2011. Most people who misuse or abuse prescription opioids obtain these pills from friends or family members who have surplus medication left over from prior prescriptions. There is little published data on surplus opioid analgesics remaining after patients recover from painful procedures. Even less is known about patients' willingness to dispose of these leftover pills. Aims: 1) Measure the impact of a risk education intervention and a financial incentive intervention on patients' willingness to dispose of surplus opioids left over after outpatient dental surgery. 2) Measure the number and proportion of opioid pills left unused after outpatient dental surgery. Methods: The study will be a pilot randomized controlled trial. Adult patients at the Penn Dental Care Center will be enrolled prior to elective outpatient dental surgery. Patients will be randomized to a control group, an educational intervention, or a financial incentive intervention. The primary outcome of the trial is the proportion of patients in each arm that express willingness to return their unused opioids. Secondary outcomes include patient use of prescribed opioids and their number of unused pills. These outcomes will be measured using novel text-message based data collection software that patients will interact with using a web-enabled cellular telephone or tablet.
The objective of this study is to evaluate clinically and radiographically the effect of Mucograft® seal when used for the ridge preservation procedure in combination with Freeze Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA) at the extraction site in terms of hard and soft tissue remodeling after 4 months healing period.