Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02605239
Other study ID # 2013-18a
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received November 11, 2015
Last updated November 12, 2015
Start date March 2013
Est. completion date October 2015

Study information

Verified date November 2015
Source University of Chile
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Chile: Comité de Ética Científico
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

58 patients between 18 and 76 years who attended the Operative Dentistry Clinic at Dental School, Universidad de Chile, were included in the study. Those patients were bleaching and included in this study and signed a consent form. The patients were treated with 10% carbamide peroxide (CP) gel (Whiteness Perfect, FGM) to each subject with verbal instructions for 3 weeks with daily applications of 1 hour according to manufacturers indications , before and after this procedure was applied again the OHIP-Esthetics , PIDAQ and OES questionnaire form, had 30 minutes to answer it, were completed before , immediately after and one month control post-bleaching procedure.


Description:

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Dentistry (13/18a). This study included 58 patients aged between 18 and 76 years who attended the Operative Dentistry Clinic at the Dental School from the Local University and were eligible for bleaching (see eligibility criteria in the next item). Dental bleaching, free of charge, was suggested to the patients as a way to improve the patient's smile. The patients were informed about the benefits and possible side effects of the procedure in a standardized manner.

Eligibility criteria for dental bleaching Participants were evaluated in a dental chair and after prophylactic dental treatment with pumice and water. To be eligible for dental bleaching, participants should have good general and oral health. Each subject should have at least one central incisor shaded A2 or darker, assessed by comparison with a value-oriented shade guide (Vita classical; Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany). Patients who had undergone previous dental bleaching procedures, under orthodontic treatment, who were pregnant or lactating, or who had bruxism habits were not eligible for dental bleaching. Participants with restorations on the labial surfaces of their anterior teeth, non-carious cervical lesions, veneers, full crowns, gingival recession, spontaneous tooth pain, internal tooth discoloration, and teeth with endodontic treatment or fluorosis were also not included as they could not be immediately eligible for dental bleaching.

Bleaching Procedure For the participants who were bleaching procedure, we made alginate impressions of each subject's maxillary and mandibular arches, and these were filled with dental stone. We did not apply block-out material to the labial surfaces. A 1-mm soft vinyl material, provided by the manufacturer (FGM Dental Products, Joinville, SC, Brazil) was used to fabricate the custom-fitted tray to hold the bleaching gel. The bleaching tray was trimmed 1 mm beyond the marginal gingiva and we delivered a 10% carbamide peroxide (CP) gel (Whiteness Perfect, FGM) to each participant. We give them verbal instructions to apply the product 1 hour daily for 3 weeks. After each application, the patient should remove the tray, wash it with water, and brush teeth as usual. Verbal instructions for oral hygiene were also given, encouraging regular brushing with fluoridated toothpastes that did not contain whitening components.

For these participants, the OHIP-Esthetics, PIDAQ and OES surveys were applied before , one week and one month after the end of the bleaching procedure, and the patient was also given 30 minutes to complete it.

Color Evaluation Color evaluations were performed using subjective and objective methods. For the subjective evaluation, the 16 tabs of the Vita shade Classical guide Vita classical (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) were arranged from highest (B1) to lowest (C4) value and used to determine tooth color. Although this scale is not linear in the truest sense, it was treated as continuous with a linear ranking. Two calibrated evaluators with an agreement of at least 85% (using weighted kappa statistics) recorded the shade of the middle area of the labial surface of the upper central right incisor according to the American Dental Association guidelines. Color was registered at baseline and during treatment (after the first, second, and third week of bleaching), and one week and one month after the end of the bleaching protocol to corroborate the effectiveness of bleaching procedure. The color change between baseline and each recall time was calculated as the change in the number of shade guide units (ΔSGU), which occurred toward the lightest end of the value-oriented list of shade tabs. In case the operators disagreed on the color, a consensus was reached before dismissing the patient.

In the objective evaluation, a digital spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade, Vita Zahnfabrik) with a reliability of 97% was used. An impression of the maxillary arch was taken with dense silicone paste (Coltoflax and Perfil Cub, Vigodent, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and a window was created on the labial surface of the silicone guide using a metal device with a radius of 6 mm to allow adaptation of the tip of the spectrophotometer device and to standardize the spectrophotometric color evaluation across all recall periods.

The color coordinates (L*, a*, and b*) were recorded. The value for L* represented the value from 0 (black) to 100 (white), and a* and b* represented color along the red-green axis and yellow-blue axis, respectively. The difference between baseline and each recall period (∆E) was calculated using the formula (CIE, 1978) ∆E = [(∆L*)2+(∆a*)2+(∆b*)2]1/2.

Tooth Sensitivity Evaluation Patients were asked to keep a daily record of whether they experienced tooth sensitivity (TS). The participants were instructed to indicate their daily pain using a visual analog scale (VAS).3, 6, 7 This scale is a 10-cm horizontal line labeled no tooth sensitivity at one end and unbearable tooth sensitivity at the other end. The patient should mark with a vertical line across the horizontal line of the scale the intensity of the tooth sensitivity. Then, the distance in mm from the zero end was measured with the aid of a millimeter ruler.

Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-Esthetics) questionnaire Satisfaction was measured using the OHIP-Esthetics questionnaire validated in Chilean Spanish .The questionnaire was administered by a research operator at baseline, at one week, one month and nine months (before prophylaxis) after bleaching. Each statement was accompanied by a Likert-type scale, which generated a score ranging from 4 to 0 (very often = 4, fairly often = 3, occasionally = 2, hardly never = 1, never = 0). These individual scores were added together to give a summary score ranging from 0 (minimum) to 56 (maximum). The outcomes were considered the sum of the OHIP-Esthetics and dimension scores. The internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's Alpha test.

The Psychosocial Impact of Dental Esthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) questionnaire The questionnaire consisted of 23 items grouped into four components using factor analysis: 1) dental self-confidence ; 2) social impact ; 3) psychosocial impact ; and 4) esthetic concern .9 The first factor, dental self-confidence, consisted of six items from the self-confidence scale. The second factor, social impact, contained eight items from the social aspects scale of the quality of life questionnaire. The third factor, psychosocial impact, was derived from six formulated items relating mainly to the psychosocial impact of dental esthetics. The fourth factor was the esthetics. The patient was asked to evaluate the items using a five-point Likert scale with numerical values 0 = "not at all", 1 = "a little", 2 = "somewhat", 3 = "strongly" and 4 = "very strongly". The questionnaire was administered by a research operator at baseline, one week, one month, and nine months (before prophylaxis) after bleaching and was validated in Spanish with a confidence reported by Cronbach´s alpha of 0.90.10 The outcomes were considered the sum of the PIDAQ questionnaire and factor scores; the internal consistency was evaluated using the Cronbach's Alpha test.

Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES) The Orofacial Esthetic Scale was originally developed in the Swedish language, the OES-S. For international use, the OES-S was translated into English,resulting in the OES-E . The OES consists of eight questions, assessing the appearance of the face, profile, mouth, tooth alignment, tooth shape, tooth colour and gums, as well as an overall impression of oro-facial aesthetics. Answers to the eight questions are scored on 11-point numeric rating scales, ranging from 'Very dissatisfied' (score 0) to 'Very satisfied' (score 10). The scores of the first seven items are added to a summary score. Therefore, the OES summary score ranges from 0 (worst score -patient is very dissatisfied with all aesthetics items) up to 70 (best score - patient is very satisfied with all aesthetics items). The score of the eighth item (overall impression score) is judged separately, thus ranging from 0 (worst score - patient is very dissatisfied on global assessment) up to 10 (best score - patient is very satisfied on global assessment). Hence, lower scores imply more impaired self-perceived oro-facial aesthetics.

Sample size calculation Based on previous study we considered a difference of 4 units in any of the domains to be clinically important. With a significance level of 5% and a power of 90%, a minimum sample size of 58 participants per group would be required to detect a difference of 4 units in one of the domains of the questionnaires on before and after comparisons.

Data collection and statistical analysis Data from the OHIP-Esthetics PIDAQ and OES were collected on a spreadsheet and analyzed by a psychologist that was blind to the group assignment.

Normality of the data bleaching and the homogeneity of the variance-covariance matrix were evaluated with the Kolmogórov-Smirnov test. As data was not normally distributed, treatment efficacy (ΔE and ΔSGU) was evaluated with respect to color change using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test.

The mean intensity of tooth sensitivity in VAS scale was reported as mean and standard deviations. The percentage of patients who experienced tooth sensitivity at least once during the bleaching therapy was considered the absolute risk of tooth sensitivity, reported as percentage with the 95% confidence interval.

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) at a level of significance of 5% (α = 0.05).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 58
Est. completion date October 2015
Est. primary completion date December 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Healthy patients with Anterior teeth without restorations, previous bleaching procedures, cervical lesions, or dental pain

Exclusion Criteria:

- Pregnant or lactating,

- Had moderate or severe fluorosis,

- Tetracycline stains,

- Orthodontic treatment,

- Periodontal disease,

- Orofacial tumors,

- Trauma,

- Tooth malformation Were taking analgesic, anti-inflammatory, or antibiotic drugs

Study Design

Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Bleaching teeth
bleaching teeth with carbamide peroxide 10% for 3 weeks

Locations

Country Name City State
Chile Eduardo Fernandez Godoy Santiago

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Chile

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Chile, 

References & Publications (1)

Martín J, Vildósola P, Bersezio C, Herrera A, Bortolatto J, Saad JR, Oliveira OB Jr, Fernández E. Effectiveness of 6% hydrogen peroxide concentration for tooth bleaching—A double-blind, randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2015 Aug;43(8):965-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jun 6. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Oral Health and quality of Life Assesed by OHIP-Esthetics survey 1 month Yes
Secondary phycosocial impact Assesed by PIDAQ survey 1 month Yes
Secondary esthetics perception Assesed by OES survey 1 month Yes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03688893 - Efficacy of Laser Application in Dental Bleaching N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04346849 - Tooth Discoloration Induced by Pulpotomy Materials N/A
Completed NCT04407910 - Office Bleaching Treatment by Using Rubber-cup and Air-powder Polishing Device Prophylaxis in Rondomised Clinical Design Phase 4
Completed NCT04124068 - Efficacy of Teeth Whitening Product Offerings in Adults N/A
Completed NCT03841370 - Tooth Crown Discoloration Caused by Endodontic Treatment
Completed NCT02906982 - Evaluating the Efficacy of a Gum Health Formulation on Teeth Whitening in Patients With Gingivitis and Periodontitis N/A
Recruiting NCT06125132 - Evaluation of 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Single Color Universal Composite Resin Restorative Materials. N/A
Completed NCT03380702 - Influence of Tooth Whitening on Changes in Quality of Life N/A
Completed NCT03309748 - Photodynamic Remediation of Black Stain N/A
Recruiting NCT03528356 - Impact of Dietary Counseling on Efficacy of Tooth Bleaching N/A
Recruiting NCT04875468 - Clinical Outcomes of Bonded Monolithic Translucent Zirconia Crowns Using Two Different Compositions of Self-adhesive Resin Cements N/A
Completed NCT02603354 - Efectiveness of a Brief Protocol by a Low (6%) Concentration Gel Peroxide Hydrogen of Teeth Bleaching N/A
Completed NCT03483376 - aPDT for the Remediation of Dental Black Stain N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05620277 - Quantitative Evaluation of the Effect of Dehydration and Rehydration Levels on Tooth Color N/A
Completed NCT00818376 - Staining and Calculus Formation After 0.12% Chlorhexidine Rinses Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT06392685 - Composite Repair Using Silane Coupling Agent N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03136276 - One Year Clinical Evaluation of IPS Empress CAD Versus Polished Celtra Duo Ceramic Laminate Veneers N/A
Completed NCT04023097 - Self-selection Study of the Toothwave Toothbrush N/A
Completed NCT06404398 - Clinical Evaluation of Single Versus Multi-Shade Direct Composite Resin Veneers N/A
Completed NCT04112706 - Efficacy of CPP-ACP on Bleaching Related Sensitivity N/A