Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06436365 |
Other study ID # |
MD-190-2020 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 1, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
December 1, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2024 |
Source |
Kasr El Aini Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Distal tibial fracture management is difficult because of poor blood supply resulted from
subcutaneous location. Therefore, the study aims to compare expert intramedullary nail (IMN)
with poller screws to the distal tibial locked plate regarding operative and complications
outcomes
Description:
Stabilization of the fractured segments is the main goal in fracture fixation which will help
to achieve proper healing, fasten early mobility, and get the full function of the injured
limb. The fractures may be managed conservatively or by fixation whether internal or external
.
Tibial fractures are the most common long bone fractures because of their subcutaneous
location which makes them more liable to trauma. They are more common in young males as they
are related to sports and traffic accidents. Elderly people come in second place of tibial
fractures because they are more likely to occur from simple falls. Proper surgical management
of displaced tibial fracture will help in increasing bone stability with the surrounding
tissue and improving the bone alignment which in turn fastens the early movement, increases
overall function, and prevents prolonged bedridden.
Distal tibia fractures represent from 7% to 10% of all lower limb fractures. Basically, there
is controversy over the use of the term "distal tibial fractures" Some authors use the term
to describe the distal metaphyseal fractures as defined by one Muller square as Giannoudis
2015 et al. Others use distal tibial fractures to refer to distal shaft fractures
(meta-diaphyseal region) from 4 to 11 centimeters starting from the plafond as Polat 2015 et
al . Others use the term for both regions, describing them as " two muller squares" as
Mauffrey 2012 et al.
Management of distal tibial fracture management is difficult especially in old patients with
mature skeletons and without involvement of knee joint because of a fracture near the
position to the ankle joint with decreased blood flow resulting from the subcutaneous
anatomical location [8]. There are common fixation techniques performed in distal tibial
fracture management like open reduction with internal fixation, intramedullary nail insertion
(IMN), minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis, and external fixation with
limited open reduction and internal fixation.
Despite these different management methods achieving success in proper reduction and
enhancing the stability and union, they were associated with disadvantages that need to be
considered during the management plan which makes no single method ideally preferred for all
combined bone and soft tissue distal tibial traumas. Therefore, studies should address all
advantages, disadvantages, and the proper application of each method.
We aim in our study to compare expert IMN with poller screws to the distal tibial locked
plates in the management of the short oblique distal tibial fractures regarding clinical
outcomes, radiological findings, complications, and the need for a secondary operation.