Clinical Trials Logo

Thromboprophylaxis clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Thromboprophylaxis.

Filter by:
  • Not yet recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06195540 Not yet recruiting - Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Trials

RIVAroxaban Versus Low-molecular Weight Heparin in Patients With Lower Limb Trauma Requiring Brace or CASTing

RIVACAST
Start date: May 31, 2024
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Lower limb trauma requiring immobilization is a very frequent condition that is associated with an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). The TRiP(cast) score has been developed to provide individual VTE risk stratification and help in thromboprophylactic anticoagulation decision. The recent CASTING study had confirmed that patients with a TRiP(cast) score <7 have a very low risk of VTE and could be safely manage without prophylactic treatment. Conversely, patients with a score ≥ 7 have a high-risk of VTE and require a prophylactic anticoagulant treatment. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have been shown to be effective in this indication. However, in the CASTING study, the 3-month symptomatic VTE rate was 2.6% in this subgroup despite LMWH prophylactic treatment. This result suggests that LMWH are not sufficiently effective in this particular subgroup of high-risk patients. Direct oral anticoagulants, and in particular rivaroxaban, may be an effective and safe alternative to LMWH. In the PRONOMOS study, comparing LMWH with rivaroxaban in patients who had undergone non-major lower limb surgery, the relative risk of symptomatic VTE was 0.25 (95% CI = 0.09 - 0.75) in favor of rivaroxaban 10mg. No significant increase in bleeding was found. In addition, as LMWH treatment requires subcutaneous daily injections, the use of rivaroxaban may positively impact patients' quality of life as well as being effective in medico-economic terms. The aims of this study are to demonstrate that rivaroxaban is at least as effective, easier to use and more efficient than LMWH in patients with trauma to the lower limb requiring immobilisation and deemed to be at risk of venous thromboembolism (TRiP(cast) score ≥ 7). High-risk patients are randomized to receive either rivaroxaban or LMWH. They are followed up at 45 days and 90 days to assess the occurrence of thrombotic events or bleeding, as well as their satisfaction with the treatment received.

NCT ID: NCT04309240 Not yet recruiting - Cancer Clinical Trials

Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in High-risk Cancer Patients With Totally Implantable Access Ports

Start date: March 8, 2020
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Rivaroxaban has been developed in the various clinical settings.Although cancer-associated DVT or PE was included in previously programs, limited patients of the total populations were cancer patients with totally implantable access ports in these studies. In this sense, investigators feel that new oral anticoagulants should be re-investigated in this highly specific patients group.Therefore, investigators are planning to conduct a prospective study to estimate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in high-risk cancer patients with totally implantable access ports.