View clinical trials related to Thromboembolism.
Filter by:This study is a multicenter post authorization observational study. Cancer patients diagnosed with non high risk VTE and are followed up in an outpatient setting will be treated with LMWH and the data will be recorded. Since this is an observational study there are no specific treatment protocols, i.e., patients will be treated according to the best investigator's criteria. Treatment protocol will be based on the routine treatment practice of the involved investigator. Patients to enroll will be cancer patients diagnosed for VTE and who are able to receive outpatient LMWH treatment. There will be no specific hypothesis to be tested.
To compare the efficacy and safety of prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism by Nadroparin during hospitalization to long-term usage in patients with advanced lung cancer treated by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has harmful effects on morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. In Western VTE guidelines, all solid cancer patients receiving abdominal major surgery are strongly recommended to receive pharmacologic prophylactic anticoagulation such as low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the perioperative periods. These recommendations are based on the high incidence of postoperative VTE development in Western cancer patients. However, there have been many cumulative data about the effect of different ethnicity on the VTE development and more and more investigators and clinicians admit that Asian ethnicity has lower incidence of VTE than Western ethnicity. Therefore, it may not be advisable to apply Western guidelines as it is to the clinical situation of Asian cancer patients. Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the common cancers and the incidence is rapidly increasing in Asia, there have been few prospective data on the incidence of VTE development during the postoperative period in Asian CRC patients. To our knowledge, there have been a few small-sized prospective studies in Asia and thus clear conclusions could have not been drawn based on those studies. Most Korean colorectal surgeons think that the incidence of postoperative VTE development is very rare based on their own clinical experiences. They also have much concern about the complications such as bleeding that might be caused by routine use of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis during the perioperative periods. Therefore, in most clinical situation, many Korean colorectal surgeons do not perform perioperative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis using LMHW. Considering these clinical situations in Asia including Korea, the uncritical acceptance of Western guidelines may be inappropriate. The necessity of pharmacologic thrombo-prophylaxis can be answered only from our own prospective study on the incidence of postoperative VTE development after CRC surgery. Moreover, current surgical trend in cancer patients is minimally invasive approach such as laparoscopic surgery. However, the necessity of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in patients receiving laparoscopic cancer surgery has not been evaluated even in Western countries. Western guidelines also cannot exactly answer whether pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is really necessary in cancer patients receiving laparoscopic cancer surgery. On above backgrounds, this study was designed.
In selected patients with acute pulmonary embolism(PE), low dose (50mg/2h) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) regimen had been reported to have less bleeding tendency than the FDA-approved rt-PA 100mg/2h regimen 100mg/2h regimen (3% vs.10%), it is worthwhile to reveal whether low dose rt-PA plus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) can rapidly reverses RV pressure overload in PE, but not increase bleeding and other adverse events. The aim of the study is to compare thrombolytic treatment with LMWH in patients with acute normotensive PE with right ventricular dysfunction(RVD).
Arterial and venous thromboembolism represents one of the most common preventable health problems. Patients undergoing surgery, especially hip fracture surgery are at high risk for deep vein thromboembolism (VTE) without thromboprophylaxis. In the absence of prophylaxis, the incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) after Hip Fracture Surgery (HFS) is reportedly 4%-12%. Provision of thromboprophylaxis to all patients who undergo HFS is recommended.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the major public health problems in Western country. More than 100,000 Americans die each year from VTE. VTE is also a common complication of critical illness,1-2 and probably related to poor outcome in this patient group. Although there are guidelines about VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients and patients in medical ICU3, they are overlooked in our daily practice frequently in our country. There are many reasons for our common practice, including inadequate knowledge for the ICU physicians, more patients with bleeding tendency in ICU and low prevalence of VTE in our (eastern) country. However, the true prevalence of VTE in ICU and if thromboprophylaxis still needed in certain high risk patients are not unknown. Besides, if there is a difference in the VTE rate between western and eastern patients, what is the underlying mechanism? The major objective of this application is to answer the first part of the problem, i.e. to delineate the scope of this problem. The specific aims of this application are as follows: - prevalence of venous thromboembolism in ICU in Taiwan - specific risk in subgroups of ICU patients - prevalence and risk factors for silent pulmonary embolism
The purpose of this study is to create an institutional registry of Thromboembolic disease through a prospective survey based on epidemiological data, risk factors, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, monitoring and survival. The main goal is to describe the occurrence of thromboembolic disease and the characteristics of clinical presentation, evolution and predisposing factors of these episodes in the population of the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires.
Standard weight-based IV heparin for normal weight patients is based on actual body weight (ABW). However, no well-defined guidelines have been established for patients considered to be obese or morbidly obese. In current practice, the calculated ABW based heparin initial bolus dose and infusion rates are quite high, and therefore often not used for obese/morbidly obese patients for fear of bleeding. Heparin is distributed in the body approximately the same as blood and does not get distributed to adipose tissue. There are some studies suggesting that lean body weight (LBW) might be a better basis for dosing heparin. LBW is a calculated weight that excludes the weight of fat. The investigators hypothesize that intravenous heparin dosing based on the Lean body weight of obese/morbidly obese patients would be safe and effective in achieving a therapeutic level of heparin in 24 hours compared to the usual practice in this patient population.
Pregnancy is associated with an overall 5-10 fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE remains the most common cause of maternal death in the developed world. It is up to 10 times more common in pregnant women than non-pregnant women of comparable age. More than a third of pregnancy-related VTE occurs during the six weeks after delivery. When compared with vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery further increases the risk of pregnancy associated VTE by three-fold.
A prospective data registry for all patients who undergo IVC (Inferior Vena Cava) filter placement or retrieval at Stanford. Potential enrollees will already be undergoing the procedure. If patients are willing, they will be prospectively enrolled prior to the procedure. As part of the study, chart and clinical data reviews will be used to track patient progress and response to the treatment.