View clinical trials related to Thoracic Cancer.
Filter by:Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration is a procedure used to obtain tissue samples (biopsies) of lymph nodes near the airways or of lung tumours growing in close proximity to the airways. Briefly, an endoscope with an ultrasound probe which is inserted through the mouth and into the airways. Once in the airways, the ultrasound allows for identification of the optimal biopsy site; a hollow biopsy needle is then inserted into the tissue under real-time ultrasound visualization and a sample is extracted. In the investigator's centre, the extracted sample is then immediately subjected to rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). During the ROSE procedure, a cytotechnologist uses part of the sample to make a limited number direct smears which are then rapidly stained and evaluated under a microscope by the cytotechnologist. The cytotechnologist provides an assessment of the adequacy of the sample for diagnosis. The respirologist performing the EBUS then uses this information to: i) determine whether additional sampling is required, and ii) triage any additional samples for ancillary studies as needed. A final cytopathological diagnosis is established several days later, when all of the material from the procedure (including the material not evaluated at ROSE) is examined by a cytopathologist. There are different techniques which are utilized to perform the needle aspiration biopsy. Suction aspiration (where pressure suction is applied to the needle to draw out material) which is the standard at many centres around the world and capilliary suction (where a tiny wire is drawn back slowly to create more gentle suction force) which is utilized often at LHSC. The purpose of this study is to evaluate for differences in ROSE adequacy between these two methods.
Participants will receive an MRI with a custom-built MRI coil for each participant. The purpose is to find out whether this custom-built MRI coil can help doctors see the different parts of the spine as well as or better than they can with standard CT myelograms.
Other than optimizing medical management of cardiac risk factors, and reducing radiotherapy (RT) dose to the heart, there currently exist no interventions to mitigate or reverse the adverse cardiac effects of RT. Aerobic exercise has been demonstrated to improve patient quality of life, cardiac outcomes, and cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with cancer receiving cardiotoxic systemic therapies, but the effects of aerobic exercise on patients at high risk for radiation induced heart disease (RIHD) is unknown. In addition, home-based cardiac rehabilitation has not been tested in patients with thoracic cancers.
Patients enrolled in the study will receive standard of care adjuvant or definitive breast, chest wall or thoracic radiation therapy.Cardiac mitochondrial dysfunction is a hallmark of radiation-induced cardiac injury. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by ionizing radiation cause oxidation of mitochondrial proteins and alter oxidative phosphorylation and pyruvate metabolism(5). The goal of this study is to detect early changes in the mitochondrial metabolism in situ as a marker for subclinical radiation-induced cardiotoxicity.
Consecutive patients treated with PD-1 therapy in Qingdao City were included in our study. The effecy and safety of the four PD-1 agents according to clinical outcomes in real world will be studied.
Deficits in the management of common symptoms cause substantial morbidity for cancer patients.Because the health care delivery system is structured to be reactive and not proactive, there are missed opportunities to optimize symptom control. Growth in Internet access and proliferation of smartphones has created an opportunity to re-engineer cancer care delivery. Electronic symptom tracking and feedback is a promising strategy to improve symptom control. Electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) monitoring of cancer symptoms has been shown to decrease symptom burden, improve quality of life, reduce acute care and even extend survival. SIMPRO will use functioning ePRO prototypes to create and refine the electronic symptom management system eSyM
Aim of the study is to assess efficacy of a short course radiation treatment in patients with symptomatic thoracic malignant lesions
This study will test an intervention to improve patients' and their caregivers' ability to manage difficult emotions and communicate about the patient's illness. There will be two versions of the intervention used for this study: a culturally tailored version for Latinx participants refined during Phase 1 of this study, and a version of the intervention that was not culturally tailored for Latinx patients and caregivers developed in previous work. The two interventions differ in minor content areas. We will use the culturally tailored intervention for Latinx participants and the non-tailored intervention for non-Latinx participants. This culturally sensitive intervention has the potential to reduce Latino/a patient and caregiver distress and improve patient and caregiver quality of life, shared understanding of the patient's illness, and patients' and caregivers' ability to discuss, identify, and document patients' treatment preferences. The intervention is designed to minimize burden to patients, caregivers, and healthcare institutions to allow for easy integration into clinical practice.
This study will compare a web-based advance directive to a standard advance directive.
Background Surgery for lung cancer can be performed using open (thoracotomy) or minimally invasive techniques (Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS)). Despite being associated with fewer postoperative complications (PPCs) VATS is difficult to perform and is only used by 20-44% of thoracic surgeons in the UK. Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) maybe a more attractive minimally invasive approach. To date, no studies have explored the impact of RATS on exercise capacity or physical activity and although 1 study has looked at Heath Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) post-RATS compared to an open technique indicators of surgical technique were not controlled for. Furthermore, investigators have little understanding of patients' experience of RATS. Aims 1. To examine the variability of change in exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between those who receive thoracotomy V RATS. 2. To compare the difference in post-operative physical activity (step and activity count), across 7 days, in those who receive thoracotomy V RATS. 3. To explore the manner in which patients appraise their experience of undergoing RATS. Methods: A mixed-method, multi-center study will be undertaken, utilizing a prospective quasi-experimental study design and an interpretive phenomenological approach. 80 individuals, referred for a lung lobectomy with a primary or secondary diagnosis of lung cancer, will complete outcomes assessed at 4 time-points. The Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30) and the EORTC Lung Cancer module (EORTC QLQ LC13) will be completed at: baseline, 3-6 days post surgery, 6-weeks post-surgery and at 3-month follow up. Patients will wear an activity monitor immediately post-surgery until 1-week post-discharge. Step and activity counts will be recorded. In-depth interviews will be conducted with up to 15 patients who underwent RATS to explore the manner in which patients appraise their experience of RATS.