Clinical Trials Logo

Tendinopathy clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Tendinopathy.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04003870 Completed - Clinical trials for Achilles Tendinopathy

Orthotics and Achilles Load in Runners

Start date: January 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Compare Customized arch support orthoses (CASO) and orthotic heel lift (HL) on the effect of ATL in recreational runners with pronated feet.

NCT ID: NCT03996928 Recruiting - Tendinopathy Clinical Trials

Eccentric Exercise in Epicondylitis

Start date: January 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

There is more and more evidence of the importance of the role of kinesitherapy in the management of epicondylitis, specifically (but not exclusively) of eccentric exercise. Since eccentric kinesitherapy, when applied in a systematic way by a physiotherapist, consumes time and human resources in a significant way, and in the case of such a prevalent pathology, it is frequent that strategies of training the patient are addressed so that this is who perform the exercises after learning them. However, it is not proven that the efficacy and safety of this approach is equivalent to treatment applied by a physiotherapist. A randomized single-blind controlled trial is conducted that compares both treatment approaches for epicondylitis (eccentric exercises applied directly by a physiotherapist for 10 sessions, and eccentric exercises applied by the patient during the same time) in terms of efficacy against pain, functionality and patient satisfaction, all this within the framework of the public health system.

NCT ID: NCT03987256 Recruiting - Tendinopathy Clinical Trials

ECRB Tendinopathy: Needling ± PRP After Failure of Rehabilitation

Start date: January 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study evaluates the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) use during needling of the extensor carpalis radialis brevis tendon, after failure of proper reeducation including focal extra-corporal shockwave therapy (ESWT). Half of the patients with receive PRP and needling, and half of the patients will receive needling alone. During the reeducation, the clinical evaluation will be monitored and reported as in a case series.

NCT ID: NCT03986372 Recruiting - Tendinopathy Clinical Trials

The Effect of Multiple Injection of Platlet-rich Plasma in Chronic Patellar Tendinopathy

Start date: August 20, 2019
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

According to previous studies, the effect of PRP to patellar tendinopathy could last longer. However, the type, concentration, time and frequent of injection are still debated。 This study is to understand the effect of multiple injection of platlet-rich plasma in chronic patellar tendinopathy and to analyze the relation between efficacy of PRP and the growth factor in PRP.

NCT ID: NCT03984955 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Lateral Epicondylitis

Comparing Injection Treatments for Tennis Elbow

CITTE
Start date: April 18, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Tennis elbow is one of the most common musculoskeletal problems affecting the arm and is thought to be mainly due to overuse of the muscles that extend the wrist. The pain arises from the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, where the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles attach. There are many treatment options available for tennis elbow including oral medication, physiotherapy and injection therapy. Surgical options are reserved for those who fail to respond to more conservative treatments. Physiotherapy is a widely used, non-invasive treatment option for the management of tennis elbow. Research has shown that in the longer term, physiotherapy is superior to corticosteroid injection in the treatment of tennis elbow and a meta-analysis of published research concluded that Platelet Rich Plasma injection and Hyaluronic Acid injection are superior to corticosteroid for long term pain relief in tennis elbow. At present there is not enough evidence to indicate what the 'Gold Standard' treatment for tennis elbow is, and more research is therefore needed to help guide decision-making. The aim of this study is therefore to examine the effects of injection therapy in addition to physiotherapy treatment, in comparison to physiotherapy and a control injection on pain and function in patients with tennis elbow. All participants in this study will undergo a structured, specifically designed, class-based physiotherapy intervention, in addition to being randomly allocated to receive one of the following three types of injection: (a) a control injection whereby a needle is inserted into the skin but no therapeutic substance is injection, (b) a single therapeutic injection of platelet-rich plasm or (c) a single therapeutic injection of hyaluronic acid. Baseline data will be collected at the time of recruitment and participants will be followed up at 3 months and 12 months post treatment. Outcomes will be assessed using various patient-reported outcome measures in addition to clinical examination. The primary outcome for this study is the improvement in the quick DASH score at 12 months post-treatment compared to baseline.

NCT ID: NCT03968614 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Achilles Tendinopathy

Electrical DN as an Adjunct to Eccentric Exercise, Stretching + MT for Achilles Tendinopathy

Start date: June 10, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this research is to compare two different approaches for treating patients with achilles tendinopathy: eccentric exercise, stretching and manual therapy VS Electric dry needling, eccentric exercise, stretching and manual therapy. Physical therapists commonly use all of these techniques to treat achilles tendinopathy. This study is attempting to find out if one treatment strategy is more effective than the other.

NCT ID: NCT03967574 Completed - Clinical trials for Rotator Cuff Injuries

Subacromial Corticosteroid Injections and tDCS in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

Start date: November 4, 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study evaluates the effects of corticosteroid injections over time, as well as the additional effect provided by subsequent transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the motor cortex on patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy of the shoulder. All patients will receive a subacromial corticosteroid injection. Two weeks later, a third will receive a treatment of tDCS, a third will receive a placebo a-tDCS treatment, and the last third will not receive any additional treatment.

NCT ID: NCT03942640 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Supraspinatus Tendinopathy

Perineural Injection and Supraspinatus Tendenopathy

Start date: June 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Atotal of 150 consecutive patients with chronic supraspinatous tendinopathy were invited to participate in the study .patients were recruited from the out patient clinic of rheumatology and rehabilitation department,Mansoura university hospital a. perineural injection therapy group (subcutaneous prolotherapy) This group included 30 patients aged from 18 to 60 years Deep prolotherapy injection group The injection fluid contain 1 ml of 255 glucose and 1ml of lidocaine. The pathological area of the supraspinatous tendon was identified and graded using ultrasound pathology rating scale guided by ultrasonography (Simens Acuson p300 machine) Proper preparation with antiseptic solution of skin overlying the point of injection .

NCT ID: NCT03939247 Terminated - Tendinopathy Clinical Trials

Effectiveness of the "Tecaretherapy" in Patients With Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

Start date: April 25, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This RCT aims at investigating the effectiveness of the "Tecaretherapy" in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy. 60 patients will be randomized into one of the following 3 groups: - "Conventional physiotherapy treatment (CPT)" (massage, eccentric exercises, stretching); - "CPT + Tecare" (idem CPT group + tecaretherapy during the eccentric exercises) - "CPT + Placebo Tecare" (idem "CPT + Tecare" group but with an inactive Tecare device) The treatment will include 18 30-minute sessions

NCT ID: NCT03918434 Completed - Plantar Fascitis Clinical Trials

Efficacy of a Locoregional Anesthesia Technique During Shock Wave Therapy

Start date: June 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Plantar fasciitis and the chronic Achilles tendinopathy are the most common causes of heel pain. The term "plantar fasciitis" implies an inflammatory condition by the suffix "itis". However, various lines of evidence indicate that this disorder is better classified as "fasciosis" or "fasciopathy", as heel pain associated with degenerative changes in the fascia and atrophy of the abductor minimi muscle. High energy shock wave therapy (HESWT) has been proposed as a potential method of treating patients with chronic disease without the need to stop weightbearing. Often a crucial complication of HESWT is the appearance of pain with the subsequent interruption of the procedure. The consequences are a reduced patient compliance, need of a deep sedation and more sessions for the treatment. Frequently, topic anesthesia (TA) (as EMLA) is applied during the therapy to decrease the pain HESWT-induced and enable sham treatment. Multiple publications focused on the evaluation of a clinically relevant effect of shock wave application on plantar heel pain, either of HESWT, applied in a single session with local or regional anesthesia or of low energy HESWT, applied repetitively without local anesthesia. Rompe JD and colleagues have demonstrated that the therapeutic success rate of HESWT with TA is significantly smaller than without TA even after 3 months. Probably, the use of anesthetic topically applied can reduce the efficacy of HESWT for increased impedance. To date, many patients interrupted the HESWT for moderate-severe pain. Consequently, this therapy, which generally is administered in three sessions, required a prolongation of procedure up to six sessions.The clinical application of Posterior Tibial nerve block (already widely used in operating room) during HESWT applied in Orthopedic Day Hospital could offer the possibility to minimize the patient discomfort and to give the therapeutic doses just in few HESWT sessions, reducing the hospital access of outpatients for the treatments and the costs related to prolonged treatment caused by pain. Furthermore, this anesthetic approach could make patients tolerate majorated doses of HESWT in few sessions, with high effectiveness of procedure after several months.