Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05678725 |
Other study ID # |
tAtDComparePD |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 15, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
February 15, 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2024 |
Source |
Anhui Medical University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
To investigate the difference in the treatment efficacy between transcranial direct current
stimulation and transcranial alternating current stimulation on Parkinson's disease,
including the improvements in the motor, cognitive, and underlying neural mechanisms behind
differences in efficacy by electroencephalography (EEG).
Description:
All patients underwent a medical evaluation that include physical examinations and routine
laboratory studies before and after stimulation sessions. Patients were randomly allocated to
tACS, tDCS, and sham groups. There are about 20 patients in each group. Allocation was by
computer generating random numbers. The decision to enroll a patient was always made prior to
randomization. Patients were studied using a double-blind design. Study participants,
clinical raters, and all personnel responsible for the clinical care of the patient remained
masked to allocated conditions and allocation parameters. Only stimulation administrators had
access to the randomization list; they had minimal contact with the patients, and no role in
assessing the UPDRS(Unified Parkinson´s Disease Rating Scale), Hoehn & Yahr, and
MoCA(Montreal Cognitive Assessment). Each patient would be treated for 20 minutes of
transcranial electrical stimulation.
Before the stimulation session, UPDRS, Hoehn & Yahr, and MoCA were obtained by a trained
investigator to assess the baseline severity of symptoms. The patients received
electroencephalography (EEG) recorded during resting state for 5 minutes.
During the stimulation session, patients were asked to perform simple reaction tasks at the
same time.
After the stimulation session, UPDRS, Hoehn & Yahr, and MoCA were obtained, as well as the
Global Index of Safety(tES side effects) to assess adverse events of the treatment. The
patients also received a measure of electroencephalography (EEG) recorded during the resting
state.