Different Catheter Ablation Strategy in Vasovagal Syncope

Syncope, Vasovagal Clinical Trial

Official title:

Different Catheter Ablation Strategy in Vasovagal Syncope: A Single Center, Prospective, Randomized Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05573178
• Other study ID #: 2019XK320059
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 26, 2020
• Est. completion date: November 30, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: November 2023
• Source: China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is a prospective, single-center randomized controlled clinical trial. patients with refractory vasovagal syncope were randomly divided into two groups according to the proportion of 1:1. Group A: simple left atrial ganglion plexus ablation (RAGP + LSGP + LLGP + LIGP + RIGP ablation); B group: left atrial ganglion plexus combined with right atrial ganglion plexus ablation (group A + consolidation ablation of RAGP at the junction of right atrial septum and superior vena cava). To clarify the role of RAGP in cardiac autonomic nervous system and the effect of ablation, to establish the standard stragtegy of cardiac nerve ablation.

Description:

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the most common syncope type in clinic, but routine therapy shows no benefits. Cardiac nerve ablation affects the function of cardiovascular system by accurately mapping and ablation of cardiac autonomic ganglion plexus and adjusting cardiac sympathetic-vagal balance. The existing clinical evidence is mostly exploratory or registered clinical studies, and the sample size is small. This study intends to adopt a prospective, randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy of simple left atrial ganglion plexus ablation and left atrial ganglion plexus ablation combined with right atrial ganglion plexus ablation in the treatment of VVS, and to establish the relevant cardiac nerve ablation standards. This study is a prospective, single-center randomized controlled clinical trial. patients with refractory vasovagal syncope were randomly divided into two groups according to the proportion of 1:1. Group A: simple left atrial ganglion plexus ablation (RAGP + LSGP + LLGP + LIGP + RIGP ablation); B group: left atrial ganglion plexus combined with right atrial ganglion plexus ablation (group A + consolidation ablation of RAGP at the junction of right atrial septum and superior vena cava). Atrial modeling was established under the guidance of Ensite three-dimensional mapping system, and then MicroPace EPS 320 was used to stimulate and induce the main distribution areas of autonomic ganglia. The high frequency stimulation mode is set as follows: the stimulation frequency is 20 Hz, the voltage is 10 to 20 volts, and the pulse width is 5 milliseconds. The main sites of high frequency stimulation include: the left superior pulmonary vein and the left atrial posterior wall of LSGP, the left inferior pulmonary vein orifice of LIGP, the LLGP, around the right inferior pulmonary vein orifice, the RIGP, around the right superior pulmonary vein and the left atrial junction of the right superior pulmonary vein, the right atrial septum of RAGP, and the superior vena cava junction to stimulate RAGP. Ganglion localization standard: locate the site of vagal response (ventricular arrest, atrioventricular block, RR interval prolongation at least 50%) after high frequency stimulation, and mark it in the three-dimensional model. Under the guidance of three-dimensional system, the located ganglion plexus was ablated with saline irrigating electrode. The upper limit of power was 40W, the upper limit of temperature was 43 ℃, and the washing rate of saline was 17ml/min. The site of vagal reaction during ablation was defined as the effective ablation site . Denervated interventional therapy. The surgical end point of the treatment was defined as the disappearance of vagal response at the effective ablation site or the ablation of each effective point discharge for at least 30 seconds. Cardiac electrophysiological parameters such as heart rate, AH interval, HV interval, recovery time of sinoatrial node, Wenckebach point of atrioventricular conduction and atrioventricular conduction refractory period were measured before and after ablation. The patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months respectively after ablation procedure, to observe whether there were recurrent syncope and /or pre-syncope (including the time and frequency of recurrent syncope, inducing factors, and whether complicated with fall injury, etc.), and to reassessed tilt test, 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram and fill in Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Euroqol (EQ-5D) quality of life score form. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac nerve ablation in the prevention of refractory vasovagal syncope. The tilt test, the changes of vagus nerve function and the improvement of quality of life before and after were analyzed and compared. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiac nerve ablation strategies, and to explore the role and optimization of RAGP in cardiac nerve ablation.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 80
• Est. completion date: November 30, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: November 20, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Sign the informed consent form.
• Definitely diagnosed as vasovagal syncope (according to the 2018 ESC syncope diagnosis and management guidelines).
• Positive head-up tilt test (cardiac inhibition type, mixed type).
• Syncope attacks = 3 times in 1 year before operation and/or recurrence of syncope in the last 6 months.
• More than 2 kinds of routine treatment were ineffective or could not tolerate their side effects.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Syncope caused by other causes.
• Heart failure (NYHA grade ? or IV), congenital heart disease, valvular heart disease, deficiency. Bloody heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and myocarditis, chronic. Hepatic and renal insufficiency, diabetes, nervous system diseases, etc.
• Acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction occurred in recent 6 months; cerebrovascular events occurred in recent 3 months (such as short. Transient ischemic attack, stroke) or other disturbance of cerebral blood supply.
• Previously undergone cardiac catheter ablation, cardiac surgery and / or permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation.
• Left atrial thrombus and / or left atrial diameter > 55mm or EF < 35% were found by echocardiography or CT.
• Pregnancy and lactation.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Syncope
• Syncope, Vasovagal

Intervention

Procedure:
• cardiac ganglion plexus ablation(cardioneuroablation)
Under the guidance of three-dimensional system, the located ganglion plexus was ablated with saline irrigating electrode. The upper limit of power was 40W, the upper limit of temperature was 43 ?, and the washing rate of saline was 17ml/min. The site of vagal reaction during ablation was defined as the effective ablation site. The surgical end point of denervated interventional therapy is defined as the disappearance of vagal response at the effective ablation site or the ablation of each effective point discharge for at least 30 seconds.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
China	China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases	Beijing	Beijing
China	Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College	Beijing

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (2)

Hu F, Zheng L, Liu S, Shen L, Liang E, Ding L, Wu L, Chen G, Fan X, Yao Y. Avoidance of Vagal Response During Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Effect of Initiating Isolation From Right Anterior Ganglionated Plexi. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 20 — View Citation

Zhu C, Hanna P, Rajendran PS, Shivkumar K. Neuromodulation for Ventricular Tachycardia and Atrial Fibrillation: A Clinical Scenario-Based Review. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Aug;5(8):881-896. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Aug 19. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Number of Participants with syncope during follow up	Syncope was defined as a transient loss of consciousness and complete recovery in a very short time. We documented each time that syncope occurred.	12 month after ablation procedure
Primary	Number of Participants with pre-syncope during follow up	Pre-syncope was defined as the prodrome before syncope, such as dizziness, sweating, dyspnea, and paleness, and patients did not actually fall down. We documented each time that syncope occurred.	12 month after ablation procedure
Secondary	Number of Participants with positive results of head-upright tilt test	the positive results of head-upright tilt test were defined by VASIS standard	6 month after ablation procedure
Secondary	Number of Participants with positive results of head-upright tilt test	the positive results of head-upright tilt test were defined by VASIS standard	12 month after ablation procedure
Secondary	changes of deceleration capacity compare to baseline	The deceleration capacity was calculated with the 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram through the phase-rectified signal averaging technique.	3 days after ablation procedure
Secondary	changes of deceleration capacity compare to baseline	The deceleration capacity was calculated with the 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram through the phase-rectified signal averaging technique.	3 month after ablation procedure
Secondary	changes of deceleration capacity compare to baseline	The deceleration capacity was calculated with the 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram through the phase-rectified signal averaging technique.	6 month after ablation procedure
Secondary	changes of deceleration capacity compare to baseline	The deceleration capacity was calculated with the 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram through the phase-rectified signal averaging technique.	9 month after ablation procedure

External Links

•   article on pubmed
•   article on pubmed