Comparison Of Outcome Of Antibiotic Coated Vicryl Vs Non-Coated Vicryl In

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

We are investigating outcome of antibiotic coated vicryl versus non coated vicryl in terms of rate of surgical site infection and lebgth of hospital stay in children after lalaprotomy for perforated viscera. total 100 patients will be taken and 50 in each group.

Clinical Trial Description

Pneumoperitoneum is typically a surgical emergency, particularly in children and more than 90% of occurrences are caused by perforation of the gastrointestinal tract and other hollow viscera. Wound infections after abdominal surgery are still frequent types of nosocomial infections. Sutures can be a source of wound infection and dehisence due to bacterial adherence and colonization. Sutures coated with antibacterial agents have been developed in an attempt to reduce bacterial adherence and colonization of suture materials. The objective of the study is to compare the outcome of antibiotic coated vicryl versus non-coated vicryl in abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in children in regards of surgical site infections. It will be a randomized controlled trial in which 100 patients admitted in Children Hospital Lahore will be included. Simple random sampling will be carried out. Informed written consent will be taken from patients' guardian. The patients will be divided into two groups (50 in each group). Group-A patients will undergo laparotomy closure with antibiotic coated vicryl while Group-B patient will experience non-coated vicryl in abdominal fascial closure. All patients will be examined on 3rd, 7th and 30th post-operative day for wound infection according to Southampton wound scoring system. Data will be collected through predesigned proforma, which will be entered and statistically analyzed using SPSS version 24.0. For quantitative variables mean and standard deviation will be calculated and for qualitative variables frequency and percentages will be calculated. Data will be presented in tables and graphs. Chi-square test will be used to estimate the association between qualitative variables. P-value <0.05 will be considered significant. It is expected that results of this study may be helpful for healthcare providers to provide appropriate treatment to the patients and to prevent them from wound related complications. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT06129773
Study type	Interventional
Source	Children Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Lahore
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	November 1, 2023
Completion date	February 14, 2024

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04096885` - The Inselspital Surgical Cohort Study
Terminated	`NCT03820648` - Wound Protector Dual-ring Alexis® in Pancreaticoduodenectomy	N/A
Completed	`NCT04067843` - Effect of Photodynamic Treatment on Skin Microbiome. Single Center Study	N/A
Terminated	`NCT04042077` - Delafloxacin IV and OS Administration Compared to Best Available Therapy in Patients With Surgical Site Infections	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT05841576` - Anaesthetic Management Guided by COMET Measurements	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT05338281` - NPWT for Abdominal Incisions in DIEP Reconstructions: A RCT	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03042091` - Neomycin and Metronidazole Hydrochloride With or Without Polyethylene Glycol in Reducing Infection in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery	Early Phase 1
Completed	`NCT01697748` - Prospective Study on Cesarean Wound Outcomes	N/A
Terminated	`NCT01789697` - Text Message Study	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05966961` - Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
Recruiting	`NCT05077592` - Addition of Pre-wound Closure Povidone Iodine Wash Versus Direct Wound Closure Effect on Surgical Site Infections	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT05502380` - Broad-spectrum Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Tumor and Infected Orthopedic Surgery	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT05763602` - PVI to Prevent S. Aureus SSI After Fixation of HELEF (POTENT Study)	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT03221023` - Intrawound Vancomycin Prophylaxis for Neural Stimulator	Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed	`NCT03257202` - Topical Treatment and Prevalence of P. Acnes	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT06154720` - Surgical Site Infection After Episiotomy Repair Related to Routine Use of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Low-Risk Population
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04820075` - Efficacy of an Intervention to Improve the Preoperative Shower in Scheduled Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03561376` - Zinc Oxide Versus Petrolatum Following Skin Surgery	Early Phase 1
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04496180` - Prevena to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Emergency Abdominal Laparotomy	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04676841` - Wound Contamination During Orthopaedic Surgery

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Comparison Of Outcome Of Antibiotic Coated Vicryl Vs Non-Coated Vicryl In Abdominal Fascial Closure After Laparotomy In Children

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms