Clinical Trials Logo

Surgical Incision clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Surgical Incision.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1 ·  Next »

NCT ID: NCT06047418 Completed - Surgical Incision Clinical Trials

Blepharoptosis in Indonesia: A 5-Year Multicenter Study on Characteristics and Surgical Evaluation

Start date: March 15, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The goal of this observational study is to learn about blepharoptosis cases in national referral hospitals in Indonesia. The main questions it aims to answer are: - How is the clinical characteristics, types, and surgical evaluations of blepharoptosis in this particular setting Participant who include in this study is a patient diagnosed with blepharoptosis cases and complete medical history from January 2016 to December 2020 across 10 tertiary hospitals in Indonesia from 5 provinces

NCT ID: NCT05618912 Completed - Clinical trials for Patient Satisfaction

Scar Appearance After Postoperative Hydrocolloid Dressing Versus Standard Petrolatum Ointment

Start date: October 17, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Patients will be randomized either to receive standard daily dressing or hydrocolloid dressing using a randomization generator. After closing the wound with the sutures,the scar will be covered by a hydrocolloid dressing, which will be left in place for 7 days(Experimental) or the standard dressing (Control) that will be covered with petrolatum jelly and bandaging during this time period, which has to be re-applied daily. Patients and dermatologic surgeons will then complete surveys 7 days, 30 days, and 90 days after surgery to evaluate the cosmetic appearance of these scars.

NCT ID: NCT05508945 Completed - Surgical Incision Clinical Trials

Silk Scaffold Surgical Incision Dressing

SSSID
Start date: August 23, 2022
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

Interventional Study of the novel clinical application of SERI surgical silk scaffold affixed with dermaFLEX medical adhesive as a wound dressing, compared to two separate current standard of care for surgical incision closure devices: Prineo Dermabond and 3M Steri-Strip. Both components of the silk wound dressing prototype are FDA approved materials for other indications. This study seeks to gain insight of functionality of silk as a wound coverage material and determine variations of clinical outcomes in comparison to the synthetic mesh/cyanoacrylate device (Prineo Dermabond) and the nonwoven rayon/acrylate device (3M Steri-Strip) commonly implemented as a surgical wound dressing.

NCT ID: NCT05471466 Completed - Surgical Incision Clinical Trials

Scar Outcomes for Scalpel Versus Diathermy Neck Incisions in an Afro-Caribbean Population

Start date: August 21, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is randomized controlled double-blinded trial comparing the scar outcomes of diathermy versus scalpel surgical incisions in the neck. It was conducted in humans in an Afro-Caribbean (black) population.

NCT ID: NCT04888624 Completed - Surgical Incision Clinical Trials

A Comparison Between Two Post-operative Dressings

DrySee
Start date: September 13, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Surgical site infections are one of the leading causes of post-operative morbidity and mortality worldwide. The ideal post-operative dressing is impermeable and remains intact preventing contamination of the incision with microorganisms. In addition, it is often difficult for the patient to identify breaks in dressing integrity. This trial compares a post-operative dressing (DrySee® Inc. Houston Tx) with moisture detection allowing the patient to recognize when the dressing is compromised to a standard post-operative dressing (Tegaderm® + Pad, 3M, St. Paul, MN). The ideal dressing also allows the patient to shower without removing the dressing.

NCT ID: NCT04336371 Completed - Surgical Incision Clinical Trials

Exploratory Prospective of Experienced by Patients in the Surgery of Skin Cancers of the Face in Interventional Dermatology Department

VECUCHIR
Start date: May 28, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Surgery is the first-line treatment of localized skin cancers. Knowledge on the patient's psychological experience is limited. Therefore, the psychological impact on patients before, during and after surgery can be underestimated. Moreover, the diagnosis of cancer disturbs the patient's entire life and the onset of anxiety disorders is frequent following this announcement.

NCT ID: NCT04191993 Completed - Surgery Clinical Trials

Direct Superior Approach (DSA) vs Posterior Approach (PA) in THA

Start date: June 12, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is a highly effective treatment for patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis. The surgical approach in THA is important as it influences postoperative clinical recovery, functional outcomes, and implant positioning [1]. The evolution of surgical techniques in THA has led to the development of minimally invasive surgery, which is performed through smaller skin incisions, reduced soft tissue disruption and greater muscle preservation [2-10]. This prospective, randomised control study compares clinical and radiological outcomes in THA performed using the standard posterior approach (PA) and its less invasive modification, the direct superior approach (DSA). The study will include 80 patients with hip osteoarthritis undergoing THA. Following informed consent, patients will be randomised to one of the two treatment groups, and undergo THA using either the PA or DSA. The control group includes patients undergoing THA through the PA while the investigation group includes patients undergoing THA with the DSA. A further 25 patients randomly selected from each treatment group will undergo radiosteriometric analysis (RSA) to assess differences in early implant migration between PA and DSA groups. Clinical and radiological outcomes of interest will be recorded by blinded observers at regular intervals for 2 years after surgery. The findings of this study will enable an improved understanding of differences in postoperative clinical recovery, functional outcomes, and implant positioning in THA performed using the DSA compared to the PA approach.

NCT ID: NCT04063722 Completed - Surgical Incision Clinical Trials

Modified Benelli Procedure For Subcutaneous Mastectomy

Start date: January 1, 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study included 150 patients with gynecomastia (Grade II and III) for the period between January 2010 and January 2016 who attended private hospitals and Al- Kindy Teaching Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups according to the operative techniques used. Group A included 75 patients treated surgically with subcutaneous mastectomy using periareolar incision. Group B; included the other 75 patients who were managed by "modified Benelli technique". The subcutaneous mastectomy using "modified Benelli technique" showed a significantly lower operating time due to ample access for excision of breast tissue. Excision of excess skin allowed the areola to retain a cosmetically more acceptable position. There was a lot of pleating of the skin compared to the other technique using the periareolar incision.

NCT ID: NCT03860181 Completed - Surgical Wound Clinical Trials

Dermabond PRINEO for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Start date: March 25, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a research study to find out whether wound closure (the process of closing the surgical wound after the procedure is complete) with Dermabond PRINEO Skin Closure System (PRINEO) will be faster and improve wound healing compared to standard closing methods after total shoulder replacement. The PRINEO system involves using running stitches to close the wound, and then taping over the sutures with a sticky film that holds the wound closed.

NCT ID: NCT03748459 Completed - Surgical Incision Clinical Trials

Rhinoplasty Scar Comparison

Start date: December 7, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Traditional suture closure of the columellar scar in rhinoplasty is achieved with permanent skin sutures. These sutures create less inflammation and are thought to lead to improved final scar outcomes. However, permanent sutures require removal which creates pain and inconvenience for the patient. Some surgeons use fast absorbing sutures that do not require removal. The difference in final scar outcome based on suture material used has not been well studied. This study will examine the final scar outcomes of rhinoplasty incisions sutured with traditional permanent suture compared to fast absorbing suture. If scar outcomes are similar between these groups as judged by the patients and blinded observers, rhinoplasty surgeons may be able to preferentially utilize absorbable sutures for incision closure and avoid the pain and inconvenience for the patient during suture removal