Surgery of Right Upper Extremity Clinical Trial
Official title:
Dose-Response Relationships for Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis Following Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade
Verified date | April 2020 |
Source | Weill Medical College of Cornell University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This clinical trial is for subjects undergoing right upper extremity surgery. The aim of the study is to investigate the dose-response relationship between local anesthetic volume and ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP) in patients getting ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks in a blinded, prospective trial.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 24 |
Est. completion date | July 30, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | July 30, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 105 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Undergoing right upper extremity surgery with supraclavicular block as the primary anesthetic - Age greater than or equal to 18 years of age - American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 to 3 - Able to give informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Patient refusal for supraclavicular block - Inability to give informed consent - Allergy to local anesthetics - Hemidiaphragmatic dysfunction, suspected or known pulmonary disease - Neuromuscular disease - Obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease - Medical or anatomic contraindication to supraclavicular blockade as judged by clinician - Pregnancy |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Weill Cornell Medical College | New York | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Weill Medical College of Cornell University |
United States,
Boussuges A, Gole Y, Blanc P. Diaphragmatic motion studied by m-mode ultrasonography: methods, reproducibility, and normal values. Chest. 2009 Feb;135(2):391-400. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1541. Epub 2008 Nov 18. — View Citation
Garrett-Mayer E. The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial. Clin Trials. 2006;3(1):57-71. — View Citation
Kant A, Gupta PK, Zohar S, Chevret S, Hopkins PM. Application of the continual reassessment method to dose-finding studies in regional anesthesia: an estimate of the ED95 dose for 0.5% bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jul;119(1):29-35. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829764cf. Erratum in: Anesthesiology. 2015 Sep;123(3):740. — View Citation
Mier-Jedrzejowicz A, Brophy C, Moxham J, Green M. Assessment of diaphragm weakness. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Apr;137(4):877-83. — View Citation
Neal JM. Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia and Patient Safety: Update of an Evidence-Based Analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):195-204. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000295. — View Citation
O'Quigley J, Pepe M, Fisher L. Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics. 1990 Mar;46(1):33-48. — View Citation
Petrar SD, Seltenrich ME, Head SJ, Schwarz SK. Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following ultrasound-guided supraclavicular versus infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):133-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000215. — View Citation
Renes SH, Spoormans HH, Gielen MJ, Rettig HC, van Geffen GJ. Hemidiaphragmatic paresis can be avoided in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):595-9. — View Citation
Soares LG, Brull R, Lai J, Chan VW. Eight ball, corner pocket: the optimal needle position for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):94-5. — View Citation
Tedore TR, YaDeau JT, Maalouf DB, Weiland AJ, Tong-Ngork S, Wukovits B, Paroli L, Urban MK, Zayas VM, Wu A, Gordon MA. Comparison of the transarterial axillary block and the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;34(4):361-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ac9e2d. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Subjects With Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis at Various Volumes of Local Anesthetic 15 Minutes After Supraclavicular Block | Diaphragm motion was recorded during voluntary sniffing fifteen minutes after supraclavicular block with the specified volume of local anesthetic. Blinded investigators reviewed the scans and determined whether the scans were indicative of hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP) or not (No HDP). This data was fit to a dose response curve. | 15 minutes | |
Primary | Number of Subjects With Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis at Various Volumes of Local Anesthetic 30 Minutes After Supraclavicular Block | Diaphragm motion was recorded during voluntary sniffing 30 minutes after supraclavicular block with the specified volume of local anesthetic. Blinded investigators reviewed the scans and determined whether the scans were indicative of hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP) or not (No HDP). This data was fit to a dose response curve. | 30 minutes | |
Secondary | Change in Negative Inspiratory Force (NIF) at 30 Minutes | The change of the absolute value of NIF from the baseline measurement to that at 30 minutes after the block | 30 minutes | |
Secondary | Dose Response Curve for Motor and Sensory Block 15 Minutes After Block | As described in the protocol, each subject's block was assessed via motor and sensory exam at 15 minutes and given a score (0-20), with 20 being a perfect block and any score less than 10 indicating an ineffective block. A dose response curve was generated for block score with different volumes of local anesthetic administered. | 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Dose Response Curve for Motor and Sensory Block Score 30 Minutes After Block | As described in the protocol, each subject's block was assessed via motor and sensory exam at 30 minutes and given a score (0-20), with 20 being a perfect block and any score less than 10 indicating an ineffective block. A dose response curve was generated for block score with different volumes of local anesthetic administered. | 30 minutes | |
Secondary | Change in Room Air Oxygen Saturation at 30 Minutes. | The change in room air oxygen saturation from baseline to 30 minutes after the block was calculated. | 30 minutes | |
Secondary | Subjective Dyspnea 30 Minutes After Block | 30 minutes after the block, patients were asked to rate any symptoms of dyspnea on a scale of 0 (no trouble breathing) to 10 (extreme trouble breathing). | 30 minutes |