Subacute Stroke Clinical Trial
— REM_AVCOfficial title:
Medical and Economical Evaluation of Upper Limb's Rehabilitation Robotics After a Stroke
Verified date | October 2017 |
Source | University Hospital, Brest |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Upper limb motor control after a stroke may be improved with rehabilitation robotics at a subacute stage. The aim of this multicenter controled randomized single blind study is to define the place of rehabilitation robotics at this phase of the rehabilitation process. Both groups will realize the same time of rehabilitation. The cost benefit ratio will be compared in each group through medical assessment of improvement and definition of the costs due to the rehabilitation process.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 238 |
Est. completion date | June 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | January 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke of the middle cerebral arteria territory - 18 to 80 years old - stroke onset between 3 weeks to 3 months,with or without aphasia, with or without lateral neglect and homonymous hemianopia, with or without visual neglect - 10<or= Fugl Meyer upper limb Score <or= 40 - upper limbs pain less or equal than 3/10 (VAS) - inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation - signed inform consent Exclusion Criteria: - ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke of anterior or posterior cerebral artery - ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke of the brainstem - major aphasia evaluated by a Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) score less or equal to 3 - asthenia not allowing to work 60 minutes with the robot. - serious visual deficiency not allowing to use the robot - impossibility to install the arm on the robot because of a serious and uncontrolled spasticity or for any other reason - pronounced and constant muscular contractures, or deformation affecting the use of the extremity - upper limb's pain superior to 3/10 and/or being worse at the active and passive mobilization - serious infection and/or instability of vital functions - perfusion of the affected upper limb not removable - incapacity to stay on a chair - contraindicated sitting position - permanent deviation of the head and\or of the eyes - perturbed or non-cooperative patient - patients that must have to be isolated due to an infection process - bone fracture of the paretic limb with an onset less than 3 months stabilized or not |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | CHU d'Amiens | Amiens | |
France | CRRRF | Angers | |
France | CHU de Bordeaux | Bordeaux | |
France | CHRU de Brest | Brest | |
France | Centre Bouffard Vercelli | Cerbere | |
France | CHU de Clermont-Ferrand | Clermont-Ferrand | |
France | CHU de Dijon | Dijon | |
France | CH de Garches | Garches | |
France | EMPR Le Normandy | Granville | |
France | CHU de Nîmes | Le grau du Roi | |
France | CHRU de Lille | Lille | |
France | CHU de Limoges | Limoges | |
France | CHU de Lyon | Lyon | |
France | CRF de Valmante | Marseille | |
France | CHU de Montpellier | Montpellier | |
France | IRR de Nancy | Nancy | |
France | CHU de Nantes | Nantes | |
France | APHP - Hôpital La Salpétriere | Paris | |
France | APHP - Hôpital Lariboisière | Paris | |
France | CMRRF Kerpape | Ploemeur | |
France | CHU de Reims | Reims | |
France | CHU de Rennes | Rennes | |
France | CHU de Toulouse | Toulouse |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University Hospital, Brest | Ministry of Health, France |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Fugl Meyer upper limb motor score | Increase of the Fugl Meyer score between day 0 and day 30 with a difference between groups by at least 4 points | Day 30 | |
Secondary | Costs | The rehabilitation costs will be assessed for each group through medical and physiotherapist consultations, hospitalization costs, day of return to work if concerned. | One year | |
Secondary | Stroke impact scale (SIS) | The quality of life will be assessed through the SIS. | One year | |
Secondary | Visual analog scale (VAS) | The pain of the shoulder and the upper limb will be assessed in different positions | Day 7,14,21,30, 90,180, 360 | |
Secondary | Modification of motor control | Parameter and result of rehabilitation program on ARMEO spring are saved. Data of patient in rehabilitation robotics and healthy volunteer arms will be compared in order to evaluate the modification of the motor control at Day 30. | Day 30 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03991390 -
Effectiveness of Balance Exercise Program for Stroke Patients With Pusher Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06134921 -
Effects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Stroke Individuals
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04124367 -
IMPULSE - StIMulation of Brain Plasticity to Improve Upper Limb Recovery After StrokE
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05157347 -
Effect of Overground Gait Training Using a Torgue-Assisted Exoskeletal Wearable Device on Ambulatory Function in Subacute Stroke Patients
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01939041 -
Efficacy of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Approach to Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation in Patients With Subacute Stroke
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06210516 -
Respiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Subacute Ischemic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03009773 -
The Multitasking Rehabilitation She Enhanced Walking Speed Compared to the Simple Post Stroke Rehabilitation Task (AVC)?
|
N/A |