RISE RCT for Nurse Leaders

Stress Clinical Trial

— RISE  

Official title:

A Randomized Controlled Trial of RISE for Nurse Leaders

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05254600
• Other study ID #: 1839775
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 28, 2022
• Est. completion date: May 15, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: June 2023
• Source: AdventHealth
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether RISE for Nurse Leaders has a significant impact on nurse leaders' post-traumatic growth, resilience, insight, self-compassion, and empowerment, as well as mental well-being, in their personal lives and their working environment.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 80
• Est. completion date: May 15, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: March 15, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adult = 18 years old

• Licensed as an RN

• Unit-based nurse leader (i.e., assistant nurse manager, nurse manager) employed by AdventHealth in a hospital-based setting at the Altamonte Springs, Apopka, Celebration, Daytona Beach, DeLand, East Orlando, Fish Memorial, Kissimmee, New Smyrna Beach, Orlando, Palm Coast, Waterman, or Winter Park campus

• Able to speak, read, and understand English fluently

• Able to provide informed consent

• Willing and able to comply with all study procedures and requirements for the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Employed as a direct care nurse or in another level of nursing leadership (i.e., director of nursing, executive leader)

• A study participant of IRBNet #1504917 titled A Pilot Study of RISE for Nurse Managers

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Burnout
• Burnout, Psychological
• Stress

Intervention

Behavioral:
• RISE for Nurse Leaders Program
Psychoeducational sessions designed to impact resilience, insight, self-compassion, and empowerment

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	AdventHealth Orlando	Orlando	Florida

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
AdventHealth

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (16)

• Grant AM, Franklin J, Langford P. The Self-Reflection and Insight Scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality. 2002; 30(8): 821-836.

• Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2005; 4(4): 287-291.

• Spreitzer GM. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal. 1995; 38(5):1442-1465.

• Stamm, B. H. (2009). Professional Quality of Life: Compassion Satisfaction and Fatigue Version 5 (ProQOL). http://www.proqol.org.

• Thompson ER & Phua FTT. A Brief Index of Affective Job Satisfaction. Group & Organization Management. 2012; 37(3): 275-307.

Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available. — View Citation

Kath LM, Stichler JF, Ehrhart MG, Sievers A. Predictors of nurse manager stress: a dominance analysis of potential work environment stressors. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Nov;50(11):1474-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.02.011. Epub 2013 Mar 21. — View Citation

Kath LM, Stichler JF, Ehrhart MG. Moderators of the negative outcomes of nurse manager stress. J Nurs Adm. 2012 Apr;42(4):215-21. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31824ccd25. — View Citation

Labrague LJ, McEnroe-Petitte DM, Leocadio MC, Van Bogaert P, Cummings GG. Stress and ways of coping among nurse managers: An integrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(7-8):1346-1359. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14165. Epub 2018 Jan 24. — View Citation

Lee H, Cummings GG. Factors influencing job satisfaction of front line nurse managers: a systematic review. J Nurs Manag. 2008 Oct;16(7):768-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00879.x. — View Citation

Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5. doi: 10.1002/cpp.702. Epub 2010 Jun 8. — View Citation

Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON

Shirey MR, McDaniel AM, Ebright PR, Fisher ML, Doebbeling BN. Understanding nurse manager stress and work complexity: factors that make a difference. J Nurs Adm. 2010 Feb;40(2):82-91. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181cb9f88. — View Citation

Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200. doi: 10.1080/10705500802222972. — View Citation

Steege LM, Pinekenstein BJ, Arsenault Knudsen E, Rainbow JG. Exploring nurse leader fatigue: a mixed methods study. J Nurs Manag. 2017 May;25(4):276-286. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12464. Epub 2017 Feb 27. — View Citation

Warshawsky NE, Havens DS. Nurse manager job satisfaction and intent to leave. Nurs Econ. 2014 Jan-Feb;32(1):32-9. — View Citation

* Note: There are 16 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Posttraumatic Growth Inventory	21 item questionnaire with a scale of 0-5, with 0 meaning I did not experience this change as a result of my crisis; and 5 meaning I experienced this change to a very great degree as a result of my crisis	Group comparison from baseline to 3-month follow-up
Secondary	Brief Index of Affective Job Satisfaction	4 item questionnaire with a scale of 1-5, with 1 meaning strongly disagree; and 5 meaning strongly agree	Group comparison from baseline to 3-month follow-up
Secondary	Brief Resilience Scale	6 item questionnaire with a scale of 1-5, with 1 meaning strongly disagree; and 5 meaning strongly agree	Group comparison from baseline to 3-month follow-up
Secondary	General Self-Efficacy Scale	10 item questionnaire with a scale of 1-4, with 1 meaning not at all true; and 4 meaning exactly true	Group comparison from baseline to 3-month follow-up
Secondary	Perceived Stress Scale	10 item questionnaire with a scale of 0-4, with 0 meaning never; and 4 meaning very often	Group comparison from baseline to 3-month follow-up
Secondary	Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) Scale	30 item questionnaire with a scale of 1-5 with 1 meaning never; and 5 meaning very often	Group comparison from baseline to 3-month follow-up
Secondary	Psychological Empowerment Instrument	12 item questionnaire with a scale of A-G, with A meaning very strongly disagree; and G meaning very strongly agree	Group comparison from baseline to 3-month follow-up
Secondary	Self-Reflection and Insight Scale	20 item questionnaire with a scale of 1-6; with 1 meaning strongly disagree; and 6 meaning strongly agree	Group comparison from baseline to 3-month follow-up