Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Other |
Acceptance & Action Questionnaire-II Total Score |
Acceptance & Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), a 10 question measure of psychological flexibility (Bond et al., 2011). Scores range from 20-70, with higher scores representing greater psychological flexibility. |
Within 1 week of treatment completion |
|
Other |
Acceptance & Action Questionnaire-II Total Score |
Acceptance & Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), a 10 question measure of psychological flexibility (Bond et al., 2011). Scores range from 20-70, with higher scores representing greater psychological flexibility. |
1 month after treatment ends |
|
Other |
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale |
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff, 1977) a 20-item self-report measure of depression. Scores range from 0-60 with higher scores indicating greater depression symptoms. |
Within 1 week of treatment completion |
|
Other |
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale |
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff, 1977) a 20-item self-report measure of depression. Scores range from 0-60 with higher scores indicating greater depression symptoms. |
1 month after treatment ends |
|
Other |
Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) |
Physical health-related QOL will be assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (Ware, Johnston, Davies-Avery, & al, 1994). Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better physical health-related QOL. |
Within 1 week of treatment completion |
|
Other |
Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) |
Physical health-related QOL will be assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form survey (SF-36) physical component summary.(Ware, Johnston, Davies-Avery, & al, 1994). Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better physical health-related QOL. |
1 month after treatment ends |
|
Other |
Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) |
Mental health-related QOL will be assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form survey (SF-36) mental component summary.(Ware, Johnston, Davies-Avery, & al, 1994). Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better mental health-related QOL. |
Within 1 week of treatment completion |
|
Other |
Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) |
Mental health-related QOL will be assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form survey (SF-36) mental component summary.(Ware, Johnston, Davies-Avery, & al, 1994). Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better mental health-related QOL. |
1 month after treatment ends |
|
Primary |
Perceived Stress Scale |
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (Cohen & Janicki-Deverts, 2012) is a 10-item scale to measure stress. Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress |
Within 1 week of treatment ending |
|
Primary |
Perceived Stress Scale |
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (Cohen & Janicki-Deverts, 2012) is a 10-item scale to measure stress. Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress |
1 month after treatment ends |
|
Secondary |
Dyadic Adjustment Scale Total Score |
Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS-7) (Hunsley, Best, Lefebvre, & Vito, 2001; Spanier, 1976) is a 7-item scale designed to measure adjustment and satisfaction among married or cohabitating couples. Scores range from 0 to 36, with a higher score indicating more positive relationship quality. It has been used in sample of college-aged couples in previous literature. |
within 1 week of treatment ending |
|
Secondary |
Dyadic Adjustment Scale Total Score |
Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS-7) (Hunsley, Best, Lefebvre, & Vito, 2001; Spanier, 1976) is a 7-item scale designed to measure adjustment and satisfaction among married or cohabitating couples. Scores range from 0 to 36, with a higher score indicating more positive relationship quality. It has been used in sample of college-aged couples in previous literature. |
1 month after treatment ends |
|
Secondary |
Five Facet Mindfulness Scale Total Score |
Five Facet Mindfulness Scale (FFMQ) (Baer, Smith, Hopkins, Krietemeyer, & Toney, 2006) is a 39-item scale based on a factor analytic study of five independently developed mindfulness questionnaires, which yielded five factors of mindfulness: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging of inner experience, and non-reactivity to inner experience. Total scores range from 39-196 with higher scores indicating greater trait mindfulness. |
Within 1 week of treatment completion |
|
Secondary |
Five Facet Mindfulness Scale Total Score |
Five Facet Mindfulness Scale (FFMQ) (Baer, Smith, Hopkins, Krietemeyer, & Toney, 2006) is a 39-item scale based on a factor analytic study of five independently developed mindfulness questionnaires, which yielded five factors of mindfulness: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging of inner experience, and non-reactivity to inner experience. Total scores range from 39-196 with higher scores indicating greater trait mindfulness. |
1 month after treatment ends |
|