Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04447950
Other study ID # 0012-20
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date June 2020
Est. completion date August 2021

Study information

Verified date June 2020
Source Assuta Medical Center
Contact Ely Ashkenazy, MD
Phone +972-3-7645400
Email ashkenazy@isc.co.il
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Lumbar spinal decompression and fusion is a commonly performed procedure fro neural impingement and back pain from a variety of pathologies. The importance of pain control in the postoperative period for spinal surgery has been discussed and proven extensively, with both immediate and delayed reduction in complications and improved clinical results.

Quadratus lumborum (QL) block was introduced in 2007 and is performed under ultrasound guidance for perioperative pain management in various surgeries.However, the plane for a posterior QL block can be easily reached during open midline spinal surgery.

The investigators hypothesize that the posterior QL block is an effective analgesic tool for lumbar laminectomy surgery, because in lumbar laminectomy the quadratus lumborum is already exposed and is in direct visual contact. For that reason it is imperative to test the benefits of this procedure.

This is a double blinded randomized control study to assess the results of intra-operative QL block performed for lumbar decompression and fusion.


Description:

Spinal decompression is a surgical procedure that is performed to alleviate pain caused by pinched nerves (neural impingement). Surgical options for decompressing the lumbar spine vary from minimally invasive disc decompression to open laminectomy and foraminotomy. The lumbar spine decompression and fusion differs from a microdiscectomy in that the incision is longer and there is more muscle stripping. Lumbar spinal decompression is a commonly performed procedure and the conventional open techniques of decompression remain the gold standard of treatment.

During a lumbar decompression back surgery, a small portion of the bone over the nerve root and/or disc material from under the nerve root is removed to give the nerve root more space and provide a better healing environment. A lumbar spine decompression and fusion is typically performed to relieve the lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms. The goal of the surgery is to allow more space for the nerve root, thus reducing pain (and potentially any leg weakness or neurological symptoms) and restoring the patient's ability to participate in everyday activities[1].

Quadratus lumborum (QL) block was introduced in 2007 and is performed for perioperative pain management in various abdominal, pelvic, gynecological and hip procedures in all age groups[2]. Four types of QL block were described, differentiated by the exact location of the anesthetic injection. Type 1/lateral QL block is performed at the lateral border of the QL muscle, type 2/posterior QL block is performed at the medial edge of the QL muscle (at the border or the spine erector muscles and the thoraco-lumbar fascia), type 3/anterior is performed between the QL muscle and the psoas major and type 4 is intramuscular (see figure 1). In the majority of cases, these blocks are performed pre/post operatively under ultrasound guidance. There are sporadic reports of QL block performed for lumbar spinal surgery [3, 4].However, the plane for a type 2 QL block can be easily reached during open midline spinal surgery.

The importance of pain control in the postoperative period for spinal surgery has been discussed and proven extensively, with both immediate and delayed reduction in complications and improved clinical results [5, 6].

The investigators hypothesize that the type 2 QL block is an effective analgesic tool for lumbar laminectomy surgery, because in lumbar laminectomy the quadratus lumborum is already exposed and is in direct visual contact. For that reason it is imperative, in our opinion, to test its benefits of this procedure.

Study's objective:

To test the safety and efficacy of open quadratus lumborum block as an add-on postoperative analgesic technique for lumbar spine decompression and fusion.

Study design:

This is a pilot comparative study, double blind and placebo controlled . Patients scheduled for a lumbar spine decompression and fusion will be divided randomly into two groups of N=50 each. Subjects in both groups will receive an intra-operative exposure of the posterior QL block plane, with injection of long acting local anesthetic for group A and Saline for group B. Both groups will be monitored during their admission in the department for opioid dose administered, reported pain levels (NRS), narcotics side effects (delirium, urinary retention, falls) and general operative complications. Patient pain levels, satisfaction and general complications will be gathered during clinic follow up.

Methods:

Patients arriving to undergo lumbar spine decompression and fusion will be offered to participate in the study. They will receive a thorough explanation about the study and will sign an informed consent form. The division into each group will be done randomly on a one by one basis, by an operating room nurse. The scrubbed nurse will be exposed to the nature of the substance injected for its sterile preparation, however the surgeons will be blinded to it. Patients will be blinded to their study arm until the end of the study. The lumbar laminectomy (open decompression) procedure will be performed as usual:

- First, the back is approached through a two-inch to five-inch long incision in the midline of the back, and the left and right back muscles (erector spinae) are dissected off the lamina on both sides and at multiple levels.

- After the spine is approached, the lamina is removed (laminectomy), allowing visualization of the nerve roots.

- The facet joints, which are directly over the nerve roots, may then be undercut (trimmed) to give the nerve roots more room.

- Fusion will be performed with pedicular screws and rods and when indicated an interbody device.

Study group A will be given an analgesic injection into the quadratus lumborum, comprising of Marcaine 0.25% with normal saline (for a total of 20 ml per side). Study group B will receive an identical procedure, however with 20 ml normal saline alone per side. Time required to perform the block for both sides will be measured.

The postoperative regime will include a standardized pain protocol as is used in routine practice. all other operative or postoperative procedures are the same for both groups. Data will be collected from nurses and physical therapy as well as discharge notes. A standardized form for obtaining data will be used in clinic follow up at 2-3 weeks and 3-4 months.

Safety data collected:

A subjective report of each patient regarding any adverse events will be collected by the study nurse during their recovery. The surgeon will report at the end of each operation if there were any adverse events and level of difficulty administrating the injection on designated forms.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date August 2021
Est. primary completion date May 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Men and women at the ages of 18-80 suffering from leg + back pain or neurological claudication.

- Undergoing an elective 1-3 level lumbar laminectomy & fusion at Assuta medical center.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Chronic narcotic treatment (more than 3 months)

- Current active Infection.

- Underwent any other major operation in the last two months.

- Known hypersensitivity to local anaesthetic

- Previous lumbar instrumentation (revision of decompression to decompression with fusion will be included)

- Non Ambulatory patients

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
Type 2/posterior Quadratus Lumborum block
Injection of local anaesthetic into posterior boundry of Quadratus Lumborum muscle.
Placebo block with Saline
Injection of saline into posterior boundary of Quadratus Lumborum muscle.

Locations

Country Name City State
Israel The Israeli spine center, Assuta medical center Tel Aviv

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Assuta Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Israel, 

References & Publications (7)

Benz RJ, Garfin SR. Current techniques of decompression of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Mar;(384):75-81. Review. — View Citation

Elsharkawy H. Quadratus Lumborum Blocks. Adv Anesth. 2017;35(1):145-157. doi: 10.1016/j.aan.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Oct 3. Review. — View Citation

Iwamitsu R, Ueshima H, Otake H. Intermittent bilateral posterior quadratus lumborum block was effective for pain management in lumbar spinal fusion. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Nov;42:16. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Aug 6. — View Citation

McDonnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):193-7. Erratum in: Anesth Analg. 2007 May;104(5):1108. — View Citation

Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes S. Causes and risk factors for 30-day unplanned readmissions after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 20;39(9):761-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000270. — View Citation

Ueshima H, Otake H. Clinical experience of anterior quadratus lumborum block after lumber surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:131. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 9. — View Citation

Yoo JS, Ahn J, Buvanendran A, Singh K. Multimodal analgesia in pain management after spine surgery. J Spine Surg. 2019 Sep;5(Suppl 2):S154-S159. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.05.04. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in the use of post-operative narcotics Difference in MME (morphine milligrams equivalent) of inpatient narcotics consumption. Will be reported for each postoperative day during the inpatient stay of the patient to a maximum of 7 days.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03883022 - Vancomycin Powder Combined With Autogenous Bone Graft as a Prevention for Post-operative Infection for Spine Surgery N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04542577 - PMCF Study on the Safety and Performance of PROSPACE 3D / PROSPACE 3D OBLIQUE / TSPACE 3D
Recruiting NCT04477447 - PMCF Study on the Safety and Performance of CESPACE 3D
Completed NCT02558621 - New Robotic Assistance System for Spinal Fusion Surgery N/A
Terminated NCT01461005 - A Postmarket Surveillance Study of the Paradigm Spine Dynamic Stabilization System (DSS) N/A
Completed NCT00405691 - Safety and Effectiveness Study of the TOPS System, a Total Posterior Arthroplasty Implant Designed to Alleviate Pain Resulting From Moderate to Severe Lumbar Stenosis Phase 3
Completed NCT00205101 - Clinical Outcome Study of the Triad Allograft for Posterior Lumbar Fusion
Enrolling by invitation NCT04204135 - The Course of Hip Flexion Weakness Following LLIF or ALIF
Recruiting NCT05238740 - Comparison of Standalone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) L5/S1 Performed With Either rhBMP-2 or ViviGen® N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02805985 - Post-market Surveillance Study of FLXfit™ TLIF Interbody Fusion Device N/A
Completed NCT02931279 - PASS OCT® Post-market Clinical Follow-up
Completed NCT02966639 - Validation of Appropriateness Criteria for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
Active, not recruiting NCT02057744 - MIS ReFRESH: Robotic vs. Freehand Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgeries
Completed NCT01711203 - The Addition of a Pilates Program for Short-Term Improvements in Patients With Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis N/A
Completed NCT00549913 - Study of 3 Doses of NeoFuse Combined With MasterGraft Granules in Subjects Requiring Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion (PLF) Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT00254852 - Evaluation of Radiographic and Patient Outcomes Following Lumbar Spine Fusion Using Demineralized Bone Matrix (DBM) Mixed With Autograft N/A
Terminated NCT00095095 - Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the Telamon® Peek™ Versus the Telamon® Hydrosorb™ Fusion Device Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT03956537 - PMCF Neo Pedicle Screw and Cage Systems
Recruiting NCT05182489 - Adaptix RCT Evaluating Adaptix™ Versus PEEK Cages N/A
Completed NCT02884440 - Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Anterior Approach Spine Surgery Phase 2