tSCS + EksoGT in SCI Patients

Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Pilot Study on the Cumulative Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS) With Robotic Gait Training in Trunk Muscle Activity and Walking Index in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05921175
• Other study ID #: 2023/00350
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 2023
• Est. completion date: September 2025

Study information

• Verified date: June 2023
• Source: National University Hospital, Singapore
• Contact: Gobinathan Chandran, MBBS
• Phone: (65) 94575924
• Email: Gobinathan_CHANDRAN[@]nuhs.edu.sg
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is aimed to evaluate whether transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) can augment robotic gait training (RGT) to improve functional mobility in participants with chronic paraplegia. It also evaluate the impact of the tSCS+RGT on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), compared to RGT alone. This is a prospective single-arm crossover study in participants with incomplete chronic traumatic spinal cord paraplegia. 6 subjects will be recruited. The intervention includes Phase 1 of training which consists of 16 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) + conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks, and Phase 2 of training which consists of 16 sessions of RGT training + tSCS + conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks. Outcome measures including mobility function assessment and neuromuscular assessment will be collected at Baseline, Post-Phase 1 and Post-Phase 2. A satisfaction survey on the intervention "RGT training + tSCS + conventional physiotherapy" will be performed at week-18 assessment.

Description:

This study is aimed to evaluate whether transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) can augment robotic gait training (RGT) to improve functional mobility in participants with chronic paraplegia. It also evaluate the impact of the tSCS+RGT on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), compared to RGT alone. This is a prospective single-arm crossover study in participants with incomplete chronic traumatic spinal cord paraplegia. 6 subjects will be recruited. Once subject is identified to be eligible for the study and is agreeable to participate into the study, he/she will undergo Phase 1 of training which consists of 16 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) + conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks. After a 1-week washout period, subject will undergo Phase 2 of training which consists of 16 sessions of RGT training + tSCS + conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks. Subject will walk with EksoGT for gait training during RGT training. Components of conventional physiotherapy will include upper/lower limb ergometry and strength training as prescribed by the attending physiotherapist based on their assessment. During tSCS, cathodes will be placed on the T11 and L1 spinous process. Reference/Ground electrodes placed over the ASIS It will be on biphasic mode with an overlap frequency of 10kHz, Burst Frequency of 30Hz, Pulse width of 1ms. Stimulation intensity ranges from 5-100 mA and will be adjusted according to the patient's response. The tSCS stimulation duration for each session will be 45 minutes in conjunction with the RGT training. Outcome measures including mobility function assessment and neuromuscular assessment will be collected at Baseline (within 1 week before the starting of Phase 1 of training), Post-Phase 1 (within 1 week after Phase 1 of training) and Post-Phase 2 (within 1 week after Phase 2 of training). A satisfaction survey on the intervention "RGT training + tSCS + conventional physiotherapy" will be performed at week-18 assessment.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 6
• Est. completion date: September 2025
• Est. primary completion date: September 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 21 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Between 6 months to 2 years from the diagnosis of the traumatic SCI and who are not walking independently;

2. Age between 21 to 65 years old;

3. Incomplete spinal cord injury: ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) Grade: B-D;

4. Spinal cord injury level: T1- L1;

5. SCI-TCT Score > 13;

6. Capable of providing an informed consent;

7. Cleared by Neurosurgeons/ Orthopeadic Surgeons for tSCS;

8. Meets prerequisites for Ekso wearable robotic exoskeleton training.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Participant has uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease or cardiac symptoms as determined by the investigator;

2. Participant has any unstable or significant medical condition that is likely to interfere with study procedures or likely to confound performance and outcomes like uncontrolled neuropathic pain, depression, severe cognitive impairment;

3. Unstable or uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia;

4. Requires ventilator support;

5. Spasms that limit the ability of the subjects to participate in the study training as determined by the investigator;

6. Skin conditions that limit the application of tSCS electrodes;

7. Active implanted medical devices that may be affected by tSCS;

8. Pregnant, planning to become pregnant or breastfeeding;

9. Concurrent participation in another drug or device trial that may interfere with this study;

10. Participated in wearable exoskeleton training within the last 3 months prior to enrolment.

11. Peripheral nerve injury or significant Lumbar Radiculopathy

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Spinal Cord Injuries
• Spinal Cord Injury

Intervention

Device:
• RGT+ tSCS + conventional physiotherap
Subject will undergo 16 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) + tSCS+ conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks. Subject will walk with EksoGT for gait training during RGT training. Components of conventional physiotherapy will include upper/lower limb ergometry and strength training as prescribed by the attending physiotherapist based on their assessment. During tSCS, cathodes will be placed on the T11 and L1 spinous process. Reference/Ground electrodes placed over the ASIS It will be on biphasic mode with an overlap frequency of 10kHz, Burst Frequency of 30Hz, Pulse width of 1ms. Stimulation intensity ranges from 5-100 mA and will be adjusted according to the patient's response. The tSCS stimulation duration for each session will be 45 minutes in conjunction with the RGT training.
• RGT+ conventional physiotherapy
Subject will undergo 16 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) + conventional physiotherapy in 8-10 weeks. Subject will walk with EksoGT for gait training during RGT training. Components of conventional physiotherapy will include upper/lower limb ergometry and strength training as prescribed by the attending physiotherapist based on their assessment.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Singapore	Alexandra Hospital	Singapore

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
National University Hospital, Singapore	Alexandra Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Singapore, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Spinal Cord Injury - Trunk Control Test (SCI-TCT)	It measures 4 simple aspect of trunk movement: 1) rolling to weak side; 2) rolling to strong side; 3) balance in sitting position; 4) sit up from lying down. The final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum, indicating better performance)	Week 0
Primary	Spinal Cord Injury - Trunk Control Test (SCI-TCT)	It measures 4 simple aspect of trunk movement: 1) rolling to weak side; 2) rolling to strong side; 3) balance in sitting position; 4) sit up from lying down. The final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum, indicating better performance)	Week 8
Primary	Spinal Cord Injury - Trunk Control Test (SCI-TCT)	It measures 4 simple aspect of trunk movement: 1) rolling to weak side; 2) rolling to strong side; 3) balance in sitting position; 4) sit up from lying down. The final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum, indicating better performance)	Week 17
Primary	Walking Index in Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II)	It is an ordinal scale of 20 items assessing the amount of physical assistance needed, as well as device required, for walking following paralysis that results from spinal cord injury. Final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum, indicating better performance).	Week 0
Primary	Walking Index in Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II)	It is an ordinal scale of 20 items assessing the amount of physical assistance needed, as well as device required, for walking following paralysis that results from spinal cord injury. Final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum, indicating better performance).	Week 8
Primary	Walking Index in Spinal Cord Injury-II (WISCI-II)	It is an ordinal scale of 20 items assessing the amount of physical assistance needed, as well as device required, for walking following paralysis that results from spinal cord injury. Final score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum, indicating better performance).	Week 17
Primary	10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)	It measures walking speed when subject walks at comfortable speed, covered in the distance of 10 meters. Higher result indicates higher walking speed/better performance.	Week 0
Primary	10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)	It measures walking speed when subject walks at comfortable speed, covered in the distance of 10 meters. Higher result indicates higher walking speed/better performance.	Week 8
Primary	10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)	It measures walking speed when subject walks at comfortable speed, covered in the distance of 10 meters. Higher result indicates higher walking speed/better performance.	Week 17
Primary	Central motor conduction time (CMCT)	Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time (PMCT) from motor evoked potential (MEP) latency elicited by TMS to the motor cortex. Higher results indicates longer central motor conduction time and poor performance.	Week 0
Primary	Central motor conduction time (CMCT)	Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time (PMCT) from motor evoked potential (MEP) latency elicited by TMS to the motor cortex. Higher results indicates longer central motor conduction time and poor performance.	Week 8
Primary	Central motor conduction time (CMCT)	Measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It is calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction time (PMCT) from motor evoked potential (MEP) latency elicited by TMS to the motor cortex. Higher results indicates longer central motor conduction time and poor performance.	Week 17
Primary	International standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)	The test is to define and describe the extent and severity of a patient's spinal cord injury. The patient's grade is based on how much sensation he or she can feel at multiple points on the body, as well as tests of motor function. The results ranged from A (worst- complete lack of motor and sensory function below the level of injury) to E (best, all neurologic function has returned)	Week 0
Primary	International standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)	The test is to define and describe the extent and severity of a patient's spinal cord injury. The patient's grade is based on how much sensation he or she can feel at multiple points on the body, as well as tests of motor function. The results ranged from A (worst- complete lack of motor and sensory function below the level of injury) to E (best, all neurologic function has returned)	Week 8
Primary	International standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)	The test is to define and describe the extent and severity of a patient's spinal cord injury. The patient's grade is based on how much sensation he or she can feel at multiple points on the body, as well as tests of motor function. The results ranged from A (worst- complete lack of motor and sensory function below the level of injury) to E (best, all neurologic function has returned)	Week 17
Secondary	EQ5D	EQ5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. It has one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each dimension scored from 1 to 5, the higher score indicates worse performance.	Week 0
Secondary	EQ5D	EQ5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. It has one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each dimension scored from 1 to 5, the higher score indicates worse performance.	Week 8
Secondary	EQ5D	EQ5D is an instrument which evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. It has one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each dimension scored from 1 to 5, the higher score indicates worse performance.	Week 17
Secondary	Modified Tardieu Scale	Modified Tardieu Scale is to measure if there is spasticity present in a person's muscle and its response to movement. It will be measured for Quadriceps, Hamstrings, Gastrocnemius. A large difference between R1 and R2 suggests a large dynamic component with a greater capacity for change or improvement. A small difference between R1 and R2 suggests a predominantly fixed contracture in the muscle with a poorer capacity for change	Week 0
Secondary	Modified Tardieu Scale	Modified Tardieu Scale is to measure if there is spasticity present in a person's muscle and its response to movement. It will be measured for Quadriceps, Hamstrings, Gastrocnemius. A large difference between R1 and R2 suggests a large dynamic component with a greater capacity for change or improvement. A small difference between R1 and R2 suggests a predominantly fixed contracture in the muscle with a poorer capacity for change	Week 8
Secondary	Modified Tardieu Scale	Modified Tardieu Scale is to measure if there is spasticity present in a person's muscle and its response to movement. It will be measured for Quadriceps, Hamstrings, Gastrocnemius. A large difference between R1 and R2 suggests a large dynamic component with a greater capacity for change or improvement. A small difference between R1 and R2 suggests a predominantly fixed contracture in the muscle with a poorer capacity for change	Week 17
Secondary	EMG measurement and Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP)	EMG from Quadriceps, Tibialis Anterior, Gastrocnemius, Rectus Abdominis, Erector Spinae, Gluteus Maximus will be measured. Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) is to evaluate the somatosensory pathway from the lower limbs.	Week 0
Secondary	EMG measurement and Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP)	EMG from Quadriceps, Tibialis Anterior, Gastrocnemius, Rectus Abdominis, Erector Spinae, Gluteus Maximus will be measured. Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) is to evaluate the somatosensory pathway from the lower limbs.	Week 8
Secondary	EMG measurement and Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP)	EMG from Quadriceps, Tibialis Anterior, Gastrocnemius, Rectus Abdominis, Erector Spinae, Gluteus Maximus will be measured. Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) is to evaluate the somatosensory pathway from the lower limbs.	Week 17