Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Other |
Adherence to the Online-Intervention |
Assessed within the online-intervention. Indicator of adherence: time spent in program. |
During the eight-week online-intervention |
|
Other |
Adherence to the Online-Intervention |
Assessed within the online-intervention. Indicator of adherence: number of clicks. |
During the eight-week online-intervention |
|
Other |
Adherence to the Online-Intervention |
Assessed within the online-intervention. Indicator of adherence: number of modules completed. |
During the eight-week online-intervention |
|
Other |
Adherence to the Online-Intervention |
Assessed within the online-intervention. Indicator of adherence: number of exercises completed. |
During the eight-week online-intervention |
|
Other |
Negative effects of the online-intervention |
Assessed with the Inventar zur Erfassung Negativer Effekte in der Psychotherapie für Kinder (Kinder-INEP; Bieda et al., 2018). Total score ranging from -3 - 38 (representing the sum of each of the 15 individual items). Higher scores represent more negative effects of the online-intervention and a less favourable outcome. |
Assessed at post-intervention (2 months after baseline) |
|
Other |
Satisfaction with the online-intervention assessed by the Zufriedenheit mit der Intervention (ZUF-8; Schmidt et al., 1989) questionnaire |
Total score ranging from 8 - 32 (representing the sum of each of the 8 individual items). Higher scores represent more satisfaction and a more favourable outcome. |
Assessed at post-intervention (2 months after baseline) |
|
Other |
Therapeutic alliance assessed by the Working Alliance Inventory for Guided Internet Interventions (WAI-I; Gómez Penedo et al., 2020) |
Total score ranging from 12 - 60 (representing the sum of each of the 12 individual items). Higher scores represent a higher working alliance and a more favourable outcome. |
Assessed 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after baseline (during the online-intervention every two weeks) |
|
Other |
Motivation of adolescent for the online-intervention assessed with the Motivation for Youth's Treatment Scale (MYTS; Breda & Riemer, 2012) youth version |
Total score ranging from 8 - 40 (representing the sum of each of the 8 individual items). Higher scores represent more motivation and a more favourable outcome. |
Assessed at baseline and every two week during the eight week online-intervention (after 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks) |
|
Other |
Motivation of parent / guardian for the online-intervention assessed with the Motivation for Youth's Treatment Scale (MYTS; Breda & Riemer, 2012) parent version |
Total score ranging from 8 - 40 (representing the sum of each of the 8 individual items). Higher scores represent more motivation and a more favourable outcome. |
Baseline, mid-intervention(after 1 Month), and at post-intervention (after 2 months) |
|
Other |
Adolescents' expectation of the online-intervention assessed with the Credibility/Expectancies Questionnaire (CEQ; Devilly & Borkovec, 2000) youth version |
Total score ranging from 4 - 36 (representing the sum of each of the 4 individual items) and two items indicating percents from 0-100. Higher scores represent higher expectations of the online-intervention. |
Assessed at baseline |
|
Other |
Parents' / Guardians' expectation of the online-intervention assessed with the Credibility/Expectancies Questionnaire (CEQ; Devilly & Borkovec, 2000) parent version |
Total score ranging from 4 - 36 (representing the sum of each of the 4 individual items) and two items indicating percents from 0-100. Higher scores represent higher expectations of the online-intervention. |
Assessed at baseline |
|
Other |
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) |
The Ecological Momentary Assessment consists of 20 short questions asking about the momentary social context, the momentary affect (Positive and negative affective schedule for children; PANAS-C; Ebesutani et al., 2012) and factors maintaining social anxiety (derived from the Social phobia weekly summary scale; SPWSS; Clark et al., 2003). |
3 times a day during the eight week online-intervention, and three times a day for the two succeeding weeks after the follow-up assessment (5 months after baseline). |
|
Other |
Change in parents' / guardians' assessment of their children's social anxieties assessed by the Elternfragebogen zu sozialen Ängsten im Kindes- und Jugendalter (ESAK, van Gemmeren et al., 2008) |
Total score ranging from 18 - 72 (representing the sum of each of the 18 individual items). Lower scores represent less social anxiety and a more favorable outcome. |
Assessed at baseline, at mid-treatment (1 month after baseline), at post-intervention (2 months after baseline), and at follow-up (5 months after baseline) |
|
Other |
Interview with adolescents in the intervention group on satisfaction with the online intervention |
Qualitative Interview |
Assessed at post-intervention (2 months after randomization) |
|
Primary |
Change in social anxiety assessed by the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN; Connor et al., German Version: Sosic et al., 2008) |
Measure of social anxiety, total score ranging from 0 - 68 (representing the sum of each of the 17 individual items). Lower scores represent less social anxiety and a more favourable outcome. |
Baseline assessment compared to assessment at post-intervention (2 months after baseline) |
|
Secondary |
Current and past mental disorder assessed by the structured diagnostic interview for mental disorders of childhood and adolescence (Kinder-DIPS; Schneider et al., 2017) |
At Baseline, the entire Kinder-DIPS will be assessed. At post and follow-up, only the sections for social anxiety and comorbid diagnoses met at baseline are assessed. |
Assessed at baseline, at post-intervention (2 months after baseline) and follow-up (5 months after intervention); |
|
Secondary |
Change in global functioning assessed by the GF Social (Cornblatt et al., 2007) |
Structured interview assessing the level of functioning in social areas of life (friends & family) ranging from 1 to 10, higher scores indicate a better level of functioning |
Assessed at baseline, at post-intervention (2 months after baseline) and follow-up (5 months after intervention) |
|
Secondary |
Change in global functioning assessed by the GF Role Scale (Cornblatt et al., 2007) |
Structured interview assessing the level of functioning in school / work ranging from 1 to 10, higher scores indicate a better level of functioning |
Assessed at baseline, at post-intervention (2 months after baseline) and follow-up (5 months after intervention) |
|
Secondary |
Utilisation of help assessed by the Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory (CSSRI-EU; Chisholm et al., 2000; Roick et al., 2001) |
Structured interview assessing the additional use of psychological, medical and other formal and informal services and sources of help (e.g. at school, friends) |
Assessed at post-intervention (2 months after baseline) and follow-up (5 months after baseline) |
|
Secondary |
Change of fear of negative evaluation and avoidance assessed by the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents (SAS-A; La Greca & Lopez,1998) |
Total score ranging from 18 - 90 (representing the sum of each of the 18 individual items). Lower scores represent less fear of negative evaluation and avoidance and a more favourable outcome. |
Assessed at baseline, at mid-treatment (1 month after baseline), at post-intervention (2 months after baseline), and at follow-up (5 months after baseline) |
|
Secondary |
Change of generalized anxiety symptoms assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7; Löwe et al., 2008) questionnaire |
Total score ranging from 7 - 35 (representing the sum of each of the 7 individual items). Lower scores represent less anxiety and a more favourable outcome. |
Assessed at baseline, at mid-treatment (1 month after baseline), at post-intervention (2 months after baseline), and at follow-up (5 months after baseline) |
|
Secondary |
Change in depressive symptoms assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for Adolescents (PHQ-A; Johnson et al., 2002) |
Total score ranging from 0 - 27 (representing the sum of each of the 9 individual items). Lower scores represent less depressive symptoms and a more favourable outcome. |
Assessed at baseline, at mid-treatment (1 month after baseline), at post-intervention (2 months after baseline), and at follow-up (5 months after baseline) |
|
Secondary |
Change in health-related quality of life assessed by the KIDSCREEN-10 (Ravens-Sieberer et al., 2010) |
Total score ranging from 11 - 55 (representing the sum of each of the 11 individual items). Higher scores represent a higher quality of life and a more favourable outcome. |
Assessed at baseline, at mid-treatment (1 month after baseline), at post-intervention (2 months after baseline), and at follow-up (5 months after baseline) |
|
Secondary |
Change in self-esteem assessed by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES; Rosenberg, 1965) |
Total score ranging from 0 - 30 (representing the sum of each of the 10 individual items). Higher scores represent a higher self-esteem and a more favourable outcome. |
Assessed at baseline, at mid-treatment (1 month after baseline), at post-intervention (2 months after baseline), and at follow-up (5 months after baseline) |
|
Secondary |
Change in social anxiety assessed by the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN; Connor et al., German Version: Sosic et al., 2008) |
Measure of social anxiety, total score ranging from 0 - 68 (representing the sum of each of the 17 individual items). Lower scores represent less social anxiety and a more favourable outcome. |
Assessed at baseline, at mid-treatment (1 month after baseline), at post-intervention (2 months after baseline), and at follow-up (5 months after baseline) |
|