View clinical trials related to Smoking Cessation.
Filter by:1. Compare the relative efficacy of ten weeks of once weekly 250 mg D-cycloserine (DCS) vs. placebo (both in conjunction with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) on reducing cigarette smoking in treatment-seeking nicotine-dependent outpatients. 2. Compare the relative efficacy of ten weeks of once weekly 250 mg DCS vs. placebo on the process of extinction and the memory encoding process.
In an open label, randomized, two-way cross-over study, 32 male healthy regular snus users will be given repeated doses of four different types of portion snus: "General", "Catch", "Catch Mini" and "Catch Dry Mini". Each portion of used snus will be collected and frozen (-20 oC) pending analysis of lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), nicotine and tobacco specific nitrosamines (TSNAs). Unused snus is collected and deep frozen for analysis and calculation of extracted dose. Calculations of extracted amount of lead, cadmium, nicotine and tobacco specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) respectively, will be done for each type of snus.
To compare each subject's AUCinf, after administration of one single dose of 6 mg of Nicorette sublingual nicotine tablets ( three 2mg tablets) to that of one single 1 g dose of SS containing 16 mg nicotine.
The purpose of this study is to describe the differences in quitting smoking between African Americans (AA) and White smokers treated with varenicline.
To test the hypothesis that 11-15 week treatment with the inverse agonist nadolol will improve smoking cessation in patients with chronic cough associated with long-term smoking, with or without airflow obstruction, including those with established chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (chronic bronchitis dominant) or non-obstructive chronic bronchitis (NCB), compared to placebo and standard of care.
The aim of the study is to asses the efficacy of the spirometry and a minimal smoking cessation counselling intervention to quit smoking after a year in patients older than 40 years, smokers of more than 10 packs-year and without a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosis.
This is a study of the effectiveness of mobile phone support for the D.C. Tobacco Quitline. The project will test the efficacy of a web-based system that uses mobile phones to improve quit rates at 3-month intervals, relative to standard quitline services. Under the standard model, relatively infrequent, periodic support is provided to smokers who want to quit and seek out the services. The new system will complement that effort by increasing the quality, frequency and accessibility of quit smoking support - when and where the smoker needs it most. It is hypothesized that successful abstinence rates will improve to the degree that participants utilize the support system and engage with the quitline.
The investigators expect that a culturally specific group intervention targeting African American smokers will result in greater smoking cessation rates compared to a standard intervention.
Many smokers who try to stop smoking with nicotine medications (NM) such as gum, lozenge and patch, go back to smoking (i.e., a slip or lapse). Currently, labeling on many NM products tells smokers who lapse while using NM to stop NM. However, some studies suggest it is safe to continue NM upon a lapse and that doing so dramatically increases success at quitting. The investigators will test this by doing a randomized trial in which all treatment and measures are done from home with paper, phone or computer surveys. The investigators will recruit smokers who want to quit, provide them with 10 weeks of nicotine patch treatment and 5 weeks of counseling. One group will be asked to stop use of the patch if they lapse and the other group will be asked to continue use of the patch if they lapse. The investigators will compare the groups on their success at quitting and side-effects.
The objectives of this trial are: Primary objectives: 1. To determine among HIV+ individuals whether varenicline or NRT is more effective at helping individuals remain abstinent from smoking tobacco. 2. To determine among HIV+ individuals whether varenicline or NRT has the lowest side-effect profile. 3. To determine if the HIV tailored Quit Smoking Counselling Intervention, plus smoking cessation drug therapy, improves smoking cessation rates compared to smoking cessation drug therapy alone with usual care. Secondary objective: 1. To determine whether the use of varenicline/NRT is safe in HIV+ patients who exhibit depressive symptoms. Hypothesis: That varenicline will result in higher quit smoking rates and that NRT will result in a lower side effect profile. Further, the HIV tailored quit smoking intervention will result in higher rates of smoking cessation over and above the pharmacological treatment alone. And finally, varenicline will be safe to use for HIV + individuals who exhibit depressive symptoms.