Clinical Trials Logo

Sickle Cell Crisis clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Sickle Cell Crisis.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02434939 Completed - Acute Pain Clinical Trials

Low-dose Ketamine vs Morphine for Vaso-occlusive Crisis in Sicklers

KEM-VOC
Start date: June 2015
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This clinical trial will inform of the role of Low dose ketamine in the acute treatment of severe painful sickle cell crisis in children in a day-case sickle cell centre. The primary aim is to determine whether Low dose ketamine is non inferior to morphine in the management of acute painful sickle cell crises. The specific objectives will be to determine the maximal change in NRS pain score following administration of ketamine and to examine the safety profile of ketamine compared to morphine in this population. The investigators hypothesize that low dose ketamine will result in similar effective pain control as morphine alone and will not be associated with an increase in adverse events.

NCT ID: NCT02316366 Completed - Sickle Cell Disease Clinical Trials

The Use of Warmed Saline in Vaso-occlusive Episodes

Start date: November 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine if warming the intravenous (IV) fluid given to patients with Sickle Cell Disease who are experiencing painful episodes known as Vaso-Occlusive Episodes; will decrease rates of hospital admission, decrease amounts of IV pain medications given, improve pain and improve global comfort.

NCT ID: NCT01319448 Completed - Malaria Clinical Trials

Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in Patient With Sickle Cell Disease

Start date: September 2011
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Malaria prophylaxis is recommended for sickle cell disease patients. In Nigeria, daily proguanil or weekly pyrimethamine are the most commonly prescribed regimens, but the current policy is not effective due to poor compliance and drug resistance. Intermittent treatment with a long acting drug regimen administered under supervision at clinic visits may be more effective. The aim of this trial is to compare the tolerability and acceptability of supervised bimonthly treatment with either sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SP+AQ) or mefloquine plus artesunate (MQ+AS), with the daily proguanil. Two hundred and seventy patients with sickle cell disease attending the paediatric sickle cell disease clinic in Ilorin hospital who meet the eligibility criteria and have parental consent, will be randomized to one of three prophylactic regimens: daily proguanil, bimonthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine, or bimonthly mefloquine plus artesunate. Patients will be asked to return to clinic every two months and whenever they are sick. At enrollment, the study paediatrician will conduct a physical examination of the child, and collect a venous blood sample for a complete blood cell count and biochemical screen, determination of G6PD genotype, preparation of blood smears for malaria microscopy and a blood spot for determination of molecular markers of resistance. Four days after each clinic visit, patients will be interviewed (by phone and, for a subset, at home or in the clinic) to ask about compliance and adverse events. Participants will be followed for one year. The parents or carer will be encouraged to bring their child to the Outpatient Department clinic if the child becomes unwell. The primary outcome of the trial is tolerability, secondary outcomes are adherence to the regimen, and incidence of malaria and the number of hospitalizations over 12 months. If the bimonthly regimens are well tolerated and the preliminary data from this study are promising, a larger multicentre trial will be required to determine efficacy.