Clinical Trials Logo

Shoulder Pain clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Shoulder Pain.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04822779 Recruiting - Shoulder Pain Clinical Trials

The Effectiveness of Therapeutic Ultrasound in the Treatment of Calcific Tendinitis of the Shoulder

Start date: April 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Rotator cuff tendinitis (RCT) has a prevalence between 2.7 and 22%, and predominantly affects middle-aged women. The pathophysiology has not been fully elucidated to date. RCT is characterized by hydroxyapatite crystal deposition in the rotator cuff tendons. Approximately half of the patients with RCT have pain with acute or chronic shoulder mobility limitation. In some patients, RCT shows a tendency for spontaneous and rapid regression. Diagnostic ultrasound (D-US) is a non-invasive, non-ionizing, and relatively inexpensive diagnostic imaging method that is safe and reliable in assessing rotator cuff pathology. It is very sensitive in the identification of calcifications that are shown in grayscale (B-mode) as hyperechoic structures with or without acoustic shadow. Based on ultrasound findings, Chiou HJ et al. have classified calcifications into 4 types: type I are arcuate, type II are fragmented or punctiform, type III are nodular, and type IV are cystic. Spontaneous resorption may occur with type III and IV calcifications. A positive Doppler signal (PD) surrounding the calcification is highly correlated with pain intensity. According to the European Union of Medical Specialists-Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (UEMS-PRM) guidelines, the basis of RCT therapy is individual medical gymnastics (IMG). It includes exercises aimed to restore full shoulder mobility, and improve rotator cuff and scapular stabilizer muscles strength. Other passive procedures are elective in the choice of treatment. Ultrasound therapy is often used in the treatment of musculoskeletal shoulder pathology due to its thermal and non-thermal effects. It is considered that tissue heating stimulates healing (vasodilation, acceleration of the metabolism, and improvement of the viscoelastic properties of the connective tissue). The frequency of ultrasound therapy is selected depending on the desired depth of action (3 MHz for surface structures up to 2.5 cm depth, and 1 MHz for deeper structures, up to 5 cm depth). Pulse mode is commonly used in acute, while continuous in chronic conditions. To date, only a few studies have evaluated the reduction in calcification size after ultrasound therapy. Although ultrasound therapy is routinely used in the treatment of painful shoulder, reviewing the results of research published so far, we can say that current knowledge about the effectiveness of ultrasound therapy in RCT is inconsistent (only several studies with a small number of subjects, different parameters of applied ultrasound therapy in terms of penetration depth, applied energy and duration of treatment). This indicates the need for further research.

NCT ID: NCT04817514 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

"Shoulder Musculoskeletal Disorders in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Contributing Factors and Rehabilitation Protocol"

Start date: November 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Goals: to compare the effects of two distinct rehabilitation protocols (conventional shoulder musculoskeletal rehabilitation combined with aerobic exercises versus solely conventional shoulder musculoskeletal rehabilitation) on shoulder pain, function, strength, kinematics and tendon thickness in patients with type 2 DM after 12 weeks of intervention and a subsequent follow up of 8 weeks. The secondary objective of this study will be to evaluate the association between AGEs accumulation and shoulder pain, function, strength, kinematics and tendon thickness in individuals with type 2 DM. Methodology: is a single-blinded randomized controlled trial, in which all subjects with a clinical diagnosis of type 2 DM (with at least 1 year of diagnosis), of both sexes, between 40 and 70 years, presenting shoulder pain (uni or bilateral) for at least 3 months with a pain intensity score from 3 points on a numerical rating scale for pain intensity, will be invited to participate. The main outcomes of this study will include the AGEs accumulation through skin autofluorescence measurement; shoulder pain through NRS scales; shoulder function through SPADI questionnaire and range of motion measurement; isometric shoulder muscles strength through manual muscle dynamometer measurement; shoulder kinematics through three dimensional inertial units measurements; supraspinatus tendon thickness through ultrasound measurement. All these outcomes will be measured before and after the rehabilitation protocols. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two rehabilitation groups: specific shoulder rehabilitation protocol group (SRG); or 2) specific protocol of shoulder rehabilitation plus aerobic exercise group (ARG). All individuals will be evaluated before starting the rehabilitation protocol (baseline) and at the end of rehabilitation (post 12 weeks) and 8 weeks after the end of the rehabilitation (follow up). For the statistical analysis, to verify the effectiveness of protocols over time, a variance analysis (ANOVA) of mixed model with Bonferroni adjustment will be performed for pairwise comparisons. Variables that do not meet the ANOVA assumptions will be analyzed by the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction a priori. In order to assess the secondary objective of the study, correlation tests depending on data distribution will be performed (Pearson or Spearman correlation tests). A simple linear regression analysis will also be performed in order to analyze how much the AGEs accumulation can explain the alterations in the musculoskeletal and biomechanical variables. The significance level will be set at 5%.

NCT ID: NCT04806191 Recruiting - Shoulder Pain Clinical Trials

Simple and Evidence-based Examination and Treatment of Shoulder Pain in General Practice

EASIER
Start date: March 11, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Previous research suggests that general practitioners find handling patients with shoulder pain difficult and that the current care for shoulder pain is not in line with the best available evidence (1).This project aims to assess the effectiveness, costs and implementation of an evidence-based guideline for shoulder pain in general practice.

NCT ID: NCT04790071 Completed - Shoulder Pain Clinical Trials

Dry Needling Treatment in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

Start date: October 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To evaluate the efficacy of dry needling therapy on shoulder pain and upper extremity functions in hemiplegic patients.

NCT ID: NCT04777578 Recruiting - Shoulder Pain Clinical Trials

Effects of Dry Needling in Teres Major in Patients With Shoulder Pain

Start date: February 25, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of the dry needling technique in teres major muscles on pain, range of motion, strength and extensibility of the posterior part of the tissues of the shoulder in athletes with shoulder pain.

NCT ID: NCT04768140 Completed - Clinical trials for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

Bobath Approach On Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

BAHSP
Start date: August 10, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

In this study, it is investigated that whether Bobath approach is superior to conventional physiotherapy in terms of improving hemiplegic shoulder pain, spasticity and upper extremity functionality in stroke patients.

NCT ID: NCT04758182 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

Effects of High Intensity Laser Therapy Compared With Ultrasound Therapy on Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain; Randomized Control Trial

Start date: February 27, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Hemiplegic shoulder pain is a common clinical consequence of stroke and can result in significant disability.There are several treatments for Hemiplegic shoulder pain. Patient and family education (ie, range of motion and positioning) is recommended for shoulder pain and shoulder care after stroke, particularly before discharge or transitions in care. Ultrasound therapy is frequently used to relieve pain in hemiplegic shoulder; although there were limited evidences of benefit of ultrasound in hemiplegic shoulder. Laser therapy has become increasing use in hemiplegic shoulder pain. Previous study shows that low level laser therapy significantly reduced pain and improved range of motion in hemiplegic shoulder compared with electrotherapy. High intensity laser therapy (HILT) has been known to reduce pain through multiple pathways including central nervous system pathway, peripheral nervous system pathway and tissues pathway. According to Latest systematic review and meta-analysis, HILT significantly improved pain and disability scores compared with control in musculoskeletal disease especially with neck and back pain. To the best of our knowledge, there is no clinical trial regarding the efficacy of HILT in hemiplegic shoulder pain. Therefore, the aim of our study is to investigate the beneficial effects of HILT on pain reduction, ROM and function in patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain.

NCT ID: NCT04755049 Completed - Shoulder Pain Clinical Trials

The Chinese Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form Questionnaire, Patient Self-report Section: A Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation Study

Start date: March 1, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Background: The patient self-report section of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASESp) is one of the most validated and reliable assessment tools. This study aimed to establish a validated Chinese version of ASESp (ASESp-CH). Methods: A clinical prospective study was performed. Following the guidelines of forward-backward translation and cross-cultural adaptation, a Chinese version of ASESp was established. Patients older than 18 years with shoulder disorders were included. Patients who could not complete test-retest questionnaires within the interval of 7-30 days and patients who received interventions were excluded. Intraclass correlation (ICC) was calculated for test- retest reliability, whereas internal consistency was determined by Cronbach value. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing the corresponding domains between the ASESp-CH and a validated Chinese version of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).

NCT ID: NCT04737993 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Chronic Shoulder Pain

Pulsed Radiofrequency of Suprascapular Nerve and Shoulder Joint for Chronic Shoulder Pain

Start date: December 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Background: The suprascapular nerve block is frequently used to treat chronic shoulder pain. The nerve blockade provides probably only a short-term relief, and more compelling approaches have been investigated. Pulsed radiofrequency stimulation of suprascapular nerve has been reported as safe and reliable method for pain treatment. However, formal efficacy study for pRF stimulation of the shoulder joint has not been published. Evidence-based validation of a new method is necessary for both scholastic and practical purposes. Methods: This study is a randomized active controlled blind trial. Lidocaine injections alone and pRF stimulation with two different combinations will be performed. Participants will be followed during 6 months, and subjective and objective outcome variables will be recorded. Patients are randomly allocated for suprascapular nerve block (n=50), for suprascapular nerve pRF stimulation (n=50) or for both suprascapular nerve blocks and humeroscapular joint pRF stimulation (n=50). All patients will receive standardized physical therapy at the unit of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Results: Pulsed radiofrequency is thought to be a non-neurolytic neuromodulation method with some effectiveness in relieving of both experimental and clinical neuropathic pain. Our earlier results suggest additional therapeutic benefit obtained when pRF was performed in addition to physiotherapy (TAU). In a review, Chan et al. (2016) concluded that SSNB treatment could be more effective in treating pain in patients with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis when compared to intra-articular injection of corticosteroid. Also short-term pain reduction occurred in patients with chronic rotator cuff lesions. With regard to adhesive capsulitis, SSNB treatment showed a greater effect in relieving pain but on functional outcome, the results were inconclusive. Discussion: In summary, this study investigate effects of pRF for patients with chronic shoulder pain from arthritis, frozen shoulder and/or degenerative shoulder disease. PRF can be performed in an outpatient department and provides the clinician with an alternative or additional approach to oral drug treatment and intra-articular injection. Further, it may prove to be a useful treatment for patients who are unfit or unwilling to consider surgical intervention.

NCT ID: NCT04737980 Completed - Shoulder Pain Clinical Trials

Liposomal Bupivacaine Plus Bupivacaine Peripheral Nerve Blockade Versus Ropivacaine Plus Dexamethasone Peripheral Nerve Blockade for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Start date: July 18, 2019
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This study is a comparison of analgesia effect from peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) with liposomal bupivacaine combined with bupivacaine compared to PNB with ropivacaine combined with dexamethasone for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.