View clinical trials related to Shoulder Impingement Syndrome.
Filter by:Shoulder pain is the most common musculoskeletal problem after spine and knee complaints. Rotator cuff injuries (RCI) are the most common cause of shoulder pain. RCI includes a wide spectrum from subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) to chronic tendinopathy, partial and total ruptures of the rotator cuff. In recent years there has been a renewed interest in traditional and complementary medicine (TCM) for various musculoskeletal problems. Cupping therapy, which is one of the most commonly used TCM methods, is one of the oldest medical applications with thousands of years of history. Although it is thought to be effective in many diseases, there are not enough studies in the literature about its effectiveness and mechanism of action. Our aim in this study is to investigate the effects of moving dry cupping therapy on pain, range of motion (ROM), functionality and quality of life in RCI.
Rotator cuff tendinopathy, also called subbracromial impingement syndrome, is one of the most important causes of anterior shoulder pain. Although exercise training is known as an effective intervention method in the treatment of rotator cuff/subacromial impingement problems, there is no definite consensus on which type of exercise is more effective. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the effects of the Heavy Slow Resistance (HSR) training and eccentric exercise training on pain, function, supraspinatus tendon structure, muscle strength, range of motion, subjective perception of improvement and treatment satisfaction in individuals with subacromial shoulder pain associated with rotator cuff tendinopathy.
Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (SSS) is one of the most common shoulder problems. The core region is considered a kinetic link that facilitates the transfer of torque and angular momentum between the upper and lower extremities during body movements. The decrease in core stabilization affects both trunk control and the quality of extremity movements depending on the kinetic chain in the body. The improvement in core stabilization balances the load transfer between the trunk and the extremities and reduces the asymmetry between the extremities. Core stabilization training should be included in rehabilitation programs as core stabilization is adversely affected in patients with CNS. For this reason, this study was planned to examine the effects of core stabilization training applied in addition to conventional treatment in patients with CNS on pain, range of motion, upper extremity function and core stability.
The aim of this study will be to investigate the role of cervical proprioceptive training on shoulder proprioception, pain, and disability in shoulder impingement syndrome patients
Background: Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (SIS) is the commonest disorder of the shoulder, accounting for 44%-65% of all complaints of shoulder pain. Previous studies have found kinematic changes and alterations in muscle activation amplitude or timing. Recent studies also show the different organization of the corticospinal system in patients with SIS and alterations in central motor representation in individuals with rotator cuff tendinopathy. To restore kinematic changes and muscle activation in patients with SIS, treatments of patients with SIS commonly include motor control exercise and taping. However, there are different types of taping with different properties and purposes resulting in inconsistent outcomes. Recently, a new taping technique, Dynamic tape whose properties are between the most common taping Kinesio tape and rigid tape may solve the questions above. But the evidence of the effect of Dynamic tape and the additional effect of Dynamic tape with motor control exercises are still not well understood. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the additional effects of Dynamic taping with motor control exercise compared to motor control exercise alone on kinematic, muscle activity, corticospinal excitability, pain and function in people with subacromial Impingement Syndrome. Methods: This is a randomized control trial. Fifty individuals with SIS will be randomly assigned into either an exercise group or dynamic tape with exercise group. Both groups will receive 5 sessions of treatment in 2 weeks, with 30 minutes per sessions. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, after the first intervention and following 2-week intervention. Primary outcome measures will include scapular kinematics, scapular muscle activation and corticospinal system. Secondary outcome measures included shoulder pain by a numeric pain rating scale and shoulder function by the disability of the arm, shoulder & hand scale (DASH). Data analysis: two-way and three-way mixed ANOVA will used to compare the intervention effect of two groups.
The primary objective of the present study is to evaluate if a single acute BFR low load- exercise bout would reduce pain in patients with nonspecific shoulder pain and whether the potential hypoalgesia will be maintained after a 45-minute physical therapy shoulder exercise session. BFR exercise will be compared to a sham BFR exercise protocol. We hypothesize that the participants in the BFR group in will experience reduced pain and will be able to complete a scapula and rotator cuff muscles exercise loading program with reduced pain until the end of the exercise program.
shoulder sub acromial impingement syndrome is an encroachment of subacrormial tissues, rotator cuff, subacrormial bursa, and the long head of the biceps tendon, as a result of narrowing of the subacrormial space. Activities requiring repetitive or sustained use of the arms over head often predispose the rotator cuff tendon to injury. Hence the objective of the study is to examine the influence of extra corporeal Shock wave versus phonophoresis on pain severity and functional disability in patients with sub acromial impingement syndrome.
Purposes of the study To investigate the effect of adding High-Intensity Exercises to conventional physical therapy in patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
Background and Purpose: Rock climbing has been a popular sport in recent years. Rock climbing includes various open-chain and closed-chain arm movements. Overhead reaching and pull-up are the basic rock climbing elements heavily involving upper extremities. Different inclination of the wall and terrain also demand sufficient range of motion and strength of the trunk. Generally overhead reaching and arm elevation may have similar shoulder kinematics, including scapular upward rotation, posterior tilt and external rotation. Arm elevation usually is accompanied with thoracic extension and unilateral lateral flexion and rotation. During pull-up, the scapula rotates downward and externally and tilts anterior. The prevalence of shoulder injuries are about 17%, the second most common among rock climbing injuries. In the shoulder injuries, shoulder labrum lesions and shoulder impingement are the most common. Previous studies have shown that individuals with shoulder impingement syndrome have shown decreased upward and externally rotation during arm elevation, and have limited thoracic extension range of motion and greater kyphotic posture. However, a previous study found no difference in the scapular kinematics and scapular muscle activation during pull-up in rock climbers with shoulder pain and healthy climbers. The non-significant finding may be due to that the pure pull-up may not mimic climbing tasks, in which the shoulder and trunk need to adapt different inclination of the wall. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the kinematics and muscle activation of the thoracic spine and shoulder in rock climbers with shoulder pain during climbing tasks with different reaching angles. Methods: Thirty sport climbers with shoulder pain and 30 healthy climbers matched with gender, age, and dominant hand will be recruited in this study. Testing tasks will include arm elevation in the scapular plane, overhead reaching to the target 15° backward to the frontal plane, pull-up with overhead reaching forward and backward. Thoracic and shoulder kinematics will be collected using an electromagnetic tracking system. The upper trapezius, lower trapezius, serratus anterior, latissimus dorsi, and erector spinae were collected with surface electromyography (EMG). A two-way mixed ANOVA will be used to determine differences between groups in the kinematics and EMG measures at the different arm elevation angles for the testing tasks.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether pretreatment central sensitization presence affect shoulder steroid injection resuls in patients with rotator cuff pathology. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is central sensitization associated with decreased treatment response? 2. Do the clinical features of patients with central sensitization differ from those of those without? Participants will be applied a shoulder injection and the treatment response will be monitored.