View clinical trials related to Self Administration.
Filter by:In recent years, vital drugs such as heparin, insulin, growth hormone, interferons, monoclonal antibodies and drugs containing proteins that can be destroyed in the gastrointestinal tract have been developed in the form of self-subcutaneous injection in order to reduce the negative effects of treatment practices on the lives of patients. After the training, the patients can apply the subcutaneous injection on their own without assistance. This situation reduces the dependency on the nurse and allows the patient to apply the injection on time, without the need to reach the health institutions. In a study, it is stated that the inadequacy of injection training causes many patients to develop inappropriate injection behavior patterns and to acquire habits regarding these inappropriate techniques. It is also stated that the anxiety they experienced before the injection caused them to ignore the critical steps towards the injection application. In this study, the Subcutaneous Injection Hybrid Model, developed by the researcher, will be used in the training of patients who administer biologic drugs subcutaneously. It is thought that these patients will improve their injection practice skills and reduce their anxiety about injection by repetitive applications by training with the hybrid simulation method.
Background Medication administration errors occur in around 20% of administrations. Patient involvement (PI) is recommended and self-management support e.g. as self-administration of patient's own drugs during hospital stay is a central component of practising PI. Aim To investigate whether PI in administering drugs in hospital affects the number of medication errors, medication adherence and patient satisfaction and whether it is economically advantageously. Materials and methods The PhD Study is performed at the Department of Cardiology, Randers Regional Hospital. The study design is "complex intervention" and the PhD study therefore consists of three studies. In study 1 the intervention is developed, investigated for feasibility and pilot-tested in small scale. In study 2 and 3 the intervention is evaluated within a RCT with outcomes as medication errors, medication adherence, patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness.