View clinical trials related to Sedation and Analgesia.
Filter by:Sedatives and analgesics are usually given for analgesic, anxiolytic, or sedating purposes for patients with critical illness, while they inevitably inhibit respiratory and circulatory function. Sometimes, patients receive deep sedation to induce hypoventilation or suppress spontaneous respiratory effort. The sedation level in clinical practice is usually assessed with subjective sedation scoring systems, such as the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS). However, studies have found that sedation depth based on RASS is not a reliable marker of respiratory drive during critical illness. In recent years, researchers have proposed to monitor the effects of sedatives and analgesics on respiratory indicators and to implement lung-protective sedation, such as P0.1, Pocc, Pmus, WOB, and PTP. However, different pharmacological characteristics, different depths of sedation, and different sedation regimens among different sedatives and analgesics make a great difference in their effects on respiration. Ciprofol is an analog of propofol, with increased stereoselective effects adding to its anesthetic properties, is increasingly used in the intensive care unit, but its effects on respiration are not well understood. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of ciprofol on respiratory patterns, respiratory drive, and inspiratory effort in mechanically ventilated patients.
The aim of this study is to conduct a prospective, single-center randomized controlled study to investigate the effect of mild midazolam combined with sufentanil on radial artery cannulation in novice operators.
In this parallel, multicenter, single-blind randomized controlled trial, mechanical ventilated patients will be randomly assigned to two groups. One receives remimazolam to achieve sedation goals, while the other receives Midazolam. The primary outcome is the effect of remimazolam on duration of mechanical ventilated of critical patients compared to midazolam.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of sedation and analgesia in the treament of colorectal polyps by colonoscopy.
Sedation and analgesia is a very important part of the comprehensive treatment of critically ill patients. The comprehensive management strategy of sedation and analgesia in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and the control of infection, the application of antibiotics, and active recovery-are equally important. Effective sedation and analgesia assessment tools and reasonable comprehensive management strategies can not only improve patient comfort, reduce discomfort memory, but also reduce nursing workload and improve clinical outcomes. The "eCASH" theory proposed by Vincent et al. in 2016 further improved the comprehensive management strategy for sedation and analgesia. Its main contents are early analgesia to make patients comfortable, minimal sedatives and maximum humanitarian care. However, unreasonable sedation, especially early deep sedation, is closely related to the poor prognosis of patients. With the update of the ICU sedation and analgesia guidelines and the continuous progress of related research, ICU doctors have gradually deepened their understanding of sedation and analgesia. At present, the level of emergency ICU development in various regions of the country is uneven, and the implementation of sedation and analgesia may also vary greatly. Therefore, by investigating and understanding the implementation of emergency ICU or ICU sedation and analgesia in various regions of the country, you can indirectly understand the familiarity of medical staff with sedation and analgesia guidelines, and formulate corresponding strategies for specific situations, which may help improve critical illness. The level of sedation and analgesia of the patient improves the treatment effect. So far, there are few domestic research reports on the implementation of sedation and analgesia in critical patients, especially the data in the emergency ICU. This study intends to investigate the implementation status of sedation and analgesia in critically ill patients in ICU, to understand the familiarity of medical staff with sedation and analgesia guidelines, and provide a basis for further measures.
This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus ketamine versus midazolam combined with propofol in cancer patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the anti-emetic effect of oral ondansetron. For this evaluation, the investigators will perform a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controled, randomized study. The investigators assumption is that oral ondansetron prior to intramuscular ketamine will reduce the occurrence of ketamine-induced vomiting.