View clinical trials related to Sarcoma.
Filter by:The objectives of this trial is to evaluate efficacy and safety of treatment with Trabectedin in a large cohort of German patients with soft tissue and bone sarcomas.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of ifosfamide when added to the combination regimen of olaratumab and doxorubicin in participants with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS).
The purpose of this study is to test any good and bad effects of the combination of study drugs called NKTR-214 and nivolumab.
Phase I-II, single-arm, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, international clinical trial, with two stages. Stage one has two cohorts (soft tissue sarcoma and bone sarcoma) and stage two has eight cohorts (DDCS, EMC, VS, SFT, CCS, ASPS, UPS, LMS and OS). Nine sites in Spain, 3 sites in Italy and 1 site in the United Kingdom. Stage 1 (PHASE 1 and PHASE 2) Objective: To determine the recommended dose of the sunitinib plus nivolumab combination for phase II part. To evaluate the efficacy of the sunitinib plus nivolumab combination as measured by the progression-free survival rate (PFSR) at 6 months in patients with advanced soft tissue and bone sarcomas. Treatment: Adult patients will receive an initial induction phase (IP) from day 1 to day 14 of sunitinib 37.5 mg/day followed by a maintenance phase (MP) of sunitinib 37.5 mg/day continuously + nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks infused over 1 hour. If three or more DLTs occur from day 15 to 42, for an initial set of 10 patients, sunitinib dose will be lowered to 25 mg/day or treatment schedule will be changed to 2 weeks on and one week off until recovery from toxicities. Stage 2 C1 to 6 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the sunitinib plus nivolumab combination as measured by PFSR at 6 months (CS/DDCS, EMC, VS, SFT, CCS cohorts) and at 12 months (ASPS cohort). Treatment: Adult patients will receive an initial induction phase (IP) from day 1 to day 14 of sunitinib 37.5 mg/day followed by a maintenance phase (MP) of sunitinib 25mg/day continuously + nivolumab 240mg every 2 weeks. Pediatric patients will receive an initial IP from day 1 to day 14 of (<18 years) sunitinib at 25 mg/day unless the body surface area (BSA) of the patient is >1.7. If BSA is >1.7, then sunitinib 37.5 mg/day will be given followed by a MP of sunitinib 25 mg/day continuously + nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks regimen (if weight ≥40 kg) or sunitinib 25 mg/day continuously + nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks regimen (if weight <40kg). C 7 Objective: To determine the MTD of the epirubicin + ifosfamide + nivolumab combination in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and of the doxorubicin + dacarbazine + nivolumab combination in leiomyosarcoma. Treatment:Cohort 7a dose level 0: Patients will receive epirubicin dose of 60 mg/m2/d, d1 and d2 IV 20 minutes; followed by ifosfamide 3 g/m2/d d1-3, IV 3h with MESNA protection (40% of total dose of ifosfamide in each administration at 0, 3 and 6 h from ifosfamide initiation). Once finished Ifosfamide infusion of day 3, nivolumab is administered during 30 minutes, at dose of 360 mg IV, Q3W. GCSF support is mandatory. If three or more DLTs occur nivolumab dose will be lowered to dose level -1. Cohort 7b dose level 0: Patients will receive doxorubicin at dose of 75 mg/m2/d, d1 IV 20 minutes; followed by dacarbazine 400 mg//m2/d IV 60 minutes. Dacarbazine is administered also on day 2 of cycle. Once finished Dacarbazine infusion of day 2, nivolumab is administered for 30 minutes, at dose of 360 mg IV, Q3W. GCSF support is mandatory. If three or more DLTs occur nivolumab dose will be lowered to dose level -1 where patients will receive doxorubicin at dose of 75 mg/m2/d, d1 IV 20 minutes; followed by dacarbazine 400 mg//m2/d IV 60 minutes. Dacarbazine is administered also on day 2 of cycle. Once finished dacarbazine infusion of day 2, nivolumab is administered for 30 minutes, at dose of 240 mg IV, Q3W. GCSF support is mandatory. One-year maintenance of nivolumab is foreseen in the absence of progressive disease. C 8 Objectives:To determine the MTD of the MAP + nivolumab combination (phase I). Proportion of patients achieving good pathological response (phase II) Treatment dose level 0: In the IP, patients will receive CDDP 120 mg/m2 in 48h IV infusion (days 1-2) followed by doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 in 48h IV infusion (days 3-4). CDDP and doxorubicin will be given on days 1-4 and 36-39. Nivolumab administration will start on day 4 at flat dose 240 mg (after the end of doxorubicin), being the following doses administered on days 18, 39, and 53 (240 mg). HD methotrexate at 12 g/m2 in 2-h infusion will be administered on days 22, 29, 57, and 64. Surgery will be performed after finishing IP. Adjuvant chemotherapy will be administered after surgery. During the MP patients will receive nivolumab on day 210, every two weeks up to day 364. If three or more DLTs occur, then nivolumab dose level -1 will be activated.
A two-cohort, fase II, open-label, non-randomized, multicenter clinical trial. 14 sites in Spain. Cohort 1: Subjects with desmoid tumor (DT) Cohort 2: Subjects with desmoplastic small round cell tumor or Ewing sarcoma (DSRCT and ES) Nab-paclitaxel (ABRAXANE) will be administered as follows: Age ≥ 21 and ≤ 80 years: 125 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15 in cycles of 28 days Age ≥ 6 months and ≤ 20 years: 240 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15 in cycles of 28 days Subjects in the DT cohort will receive a maximum of three cycles. Subjects in the DSRCT and ES cohort will receive unlimited cycles until disease progression, the subject begins a new anticancer treatment, withdrawal of parent/guardian/subject consent/assent, parent/guardian/subject refusal, physician decision, toxicity that cannot be managed by dose delay or dose reduction alone or the study ends for any reason. The main goal is to determine the objective response rate (ORR), using RECIST 1.1 criteria and to determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as CR+PR+SD for 3 months with improvement of pain with at least minimally important difference (MID) of 2 in subjects with desmoid tumors (DT cohort) and to determine the objective response rate (ORR) in subjects with desmoplastic small round cell tumor and Ewing sarcoma, using RECIST 1.1 criteria (DSRCT and ES cohort)
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) combined with ifosfamide (IFO) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS).
The purpose of this study is to assess the functional outcomes in patients undergoing proximal femur resection and reconstruction with an endoprosthesis, based on the abductor muscle repair technique. The investigators hypothesize that those patients who receive reattachment of the abductors directly into the prosthesis will have better functional outcomes overall. Furthermore, the investigators plan to develop a simple, cost effective, and reproducible method to assess abductor function at clinical post-operative visits through plain radiographs.
This randomized pilot clinical trial studies how well the Sarcoma Treatment Guide works in improving self-monitoring in patients with sarcoma who are receiving chemotherapy. The Sarcoma Treatment Guide may help patients with sarcoma to be better informed, become more engaged with care, encourage communication, and to better manage side effects associated with chemotherapy treatments in order to improve quality of life.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of TBI-1301 for NY-ESO-1 expressing synovial sarcoma when administered following cyclophosphamide pre-treatment.
The Stanford Cancer Center is undertaking a Transformation Initiative in order to improve the quality of care and care coordination across the continuum of care. The newest innovation is to introduce lay navigators to specified high-need patients. The larger goal of the project is to assess whether lay navigators can address non-clinical patient needs in a timely fashion and appropriately connect them with their clinical team when warranted. It is expected that proactive interaction with patients will decrease patient anxiety/stress related to their cancer and facilitate higher patient engagement and improved management of physical, social,and emotional health. For the pilot project, the smaller goal is to understand: how lay navigator time is used; the types and frequency of issues brought up by patients; resources that patients are given or referred to; type and frequency of mode of contact with patients; and patients' acceptance of navigators based on refusal. An electronic intake form will be used to collect this information so that data can be analyzed regularly to inform changes to the navigator program as needed.