View clinical trials related to Robotic Surgery.
Filter by:This prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label study aims to evaluate the perioperative safety and feasibility of specimen extraction through anus regarding robotic radical excision of rectal cancer.
The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze donor and recipient outcomes after robotic-assisted donor nephrectomy and hand-assisted laparoscopic donornephrectomy.
This is a prospective single center cohort study on effect of a novel robotic surgical system for performance of minimally invasive surgery in multiple specialties. The targeted procedures include Urological, upper and lower GI robotic surgeries and the expected sample size will be 20 patients. The clinical outcomes for assessment include background demographics, operative time, perioperative complications as well as completion rate of procedure, hospital stay and recovery.
Robotic surgery for common surgical procedures is on the rise despite limited evidence to support its clinical benefit. We intend to to map and characterize the prevalence of the patients'expectation that robotic surgery might be superior to open or laparoscopic procedures and to identify the sociodemographic, clinical and organisational factors associated with this expectation.
Robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction is a recently developed minimally invasive surgery for patients with rectal cancer. However, it's safety and feasibility remain undiscussed and controversial. This study reported the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone vs. robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction to discuss aforementioned question.
Obesity has become a significant health problem in Canada. When conservative efforts to lose weight fail, bariatric surgical procedures are often considered. Today, the most common bariatric procedures in North America are Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG). For many reasons, an initial bariatric procedure may require surgical revision. Some reasons include weight regain, failed weight loss or other acute and chronic complications not related to weight loss. In these cases, it may be indicated that a procedure be reversed inor converted to another type of bariatric procedure. Regardless of the planned intervention, revisional surgery is always more difficult than the initial procedure mainly due to surgical scarring and altered anatomy. Though revisional bariatric surgery has been shown to be safe, our hope is to improve the safety profile by utilizing robotic surgery. Robotic surgery can facilitate more complex procedures by providing superior imaging and freedom of movement during the procedure. The aim of our study is to evaluate prospectively the outcomes of robotic compared to laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery in terms of perioperative outcomes such as complication rates, operative time and readmissions as well as weight loss/comorbidity resolution (diabetes, hypertension, sleep apnea) where applicable.
The purpose of this study is to explore the clinical efficacy between robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy in patients with clinical Stage I gastric cancer
The purpose of this study is to explore the clinical outcomes of the robotic distal gastrectomy for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma（cT1-4a, N-/+, M0）.
The aim of the study is to compare the analgesia provided by the serratus plane block with local infiltration of the orifices of the trocars after thoracic robot-assisted surgery.
The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for robotic surgery, to characterize current practices of mechanical ventilation and to evaluate a possible association between ventilatory parameters and postoperative pulmonary complications.