View clinical trials related to Rhinitis.
Filter by:In the present study the investigators assay house dust mites (HDMs) IgE in sera of allergic rhinitis patients (AR) using immunoblotting, chemiluminescence, and ImmunoCAP assays to compare between the accuracy of both immunoblotting and chemiluminescence assays, and ImmunoCAP as gold standard.
During this project, the investigators want to explore in vitro changes in basal cells and the crosstalk with residing immune cells as potential pathogenic mechanisms in CRSwNP vs healthy controls by using surgically resected patient samples.
The NEUROMARK RCT Study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled, single-blinded, superiority trial.
This study is to assess the Onset of Action and Efficacy of azelastine hydrochloride 0.15% in treating the nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) induced by an allergen challenge in an Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU) followed by a single dose and a 3-day treatment at home.
The brief of this observational study is to evaluate usage, efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of a range of hypertonic seawater-based decongestant nasal sprays in general population. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Usage, - Efficacy, - Safety, - Satisfaction, in real-life usage with children, adults and pregnant or breastfeeding women. Participants will use the nasal spray as usual habits and complete daily questionnaires.
The aim of this study is to determine the optimal concentration of grass pollen allergens inducing rhinoconjunctivitis in subjects allergic to grass pollen in ALYATEC allergen exposure chamber. Four concentrations of grass pollen allergen (Phl p 5) are tested during 3-hour exposures: 0, 30, 60 and 90 ng/m3.
Clinical efficacy and tolerability for allergen specific immunotherapy (AIT) with Itulazax (birch pollen extract tablet) is well established. Allergen challenges are used by clinicians to confirm correct diagnosis and by researchers to evaluate the efficacy of different interventions, eg. AIT. The challenge is performed by using a specific controlled administration schedule of an allergen product in the shock organ (nose, eye, or airway) and then monitor the result. Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) is the most common allergen challenge used. Aquagen SQ (birch pollen extract) has since decades been golden standard for this purpose, but production of this product ended 2019. Clinicians as well as researchers are now in need for an alternative product. To evaluate a new method for NAC would be of value from a clinical- and research perspective. From a Nordic perspective a NAC study with dissolved Itulazax would be of special interest since birch allergy is a dominant allergen in the region. In a recently published article it was shown that dissolved Grazax and Aquagen Phleum pratense gave comparable result used in grass allergic patients. Therefore, it seems reasonable to assume that the same method could be used with dissolved Itulazax. The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility of nasal allergen challenge tests with dissolved Itulazax tablets. The main benefit of this proposal is that the allergen composition of the provocation test product is the same as the final product to be treated with. This is likely to increase the treatment motivation of the patient. In addition, the dissolving process is easier for the physician compared to the dissolving of the previously used Aquagen.
Allergic diseases in children are major public health concerns due to their widespread and rising prevalence. The most classic pathway to trigger allergy is type I allergy mediated by immunoglobulin E(IgE), but the role of immunoglobulin G4(IgG4) in allergic diseases is still worth exploring.we have collected the data of allergic patients aged 0-14 years for retrospective cross-sectional analysis to evaluate the positive rates of total IgE, HDM IgE, FS-IgE and FS-IgG4. Meanwhile, investigators screened out patients who were treated with FS-IgG4-guided elimination diets with/without probiotics for more than 3 months to clarify the role of FS-IgG4 in childhood allergic diseases by assessing the improvement of clinical symptoms before and after treatment.
A national, multicenter, randmised double blind study with parallell arms. 360 patients with grass induced allergic rhinitis will be open randomised 1:2 to 3 years Grazax sublingual immunotherapy or 3 intralymphatic injections with ALK Alutard Timothy. In a second step, the ILIT group will be double blind randomised 1:1 to an intramuscular injection of Vitamin D Vicotrat or placebo, 4 week before the start of the intralymphatic treatment. The primary outcome measure is daily combined symptoms and medication scores during grass pollen season.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Azelastine HCl-Fluticasone propionate Nasal Spray 137-50 mcg/spray compared to Dymista™ in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis