View clinical trials related to Rhinitis, Allergic.
Filter by:This study compared the safety and efficacy of a generic fluticasone furoate (Lek Pharmaceuticals) nasal spray to the reference listed drug in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Additionally both the test and the reference formulations were tested for superiority against a placebo nasal spray.
This is an efficacy study of bepotastine besilate nasal spray in seasonal allergic rhinitis.
There is inconclusive evidence whether acupuncture treatment is effective in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Furthermore, the underlying mechanisms of acupuncture in SAR are only poorly understood. It was hypothesised that the therapeutic mechanism of acupuncture is related to changes in autonomic function. AUTO-ACUSAR is a sub-study of the DFG-funded three-arm randomized controlled trial ACUSAR trial investigating the efficacy of acupuncture vs. sham acupuncture vs. rescue medication in SAR. The aim of AUTO-ACUSAR was to investigate short and long-term effects of acupuncture vs. sham acupuncture on autonomic function in a sub-group of ACUSAR patients. Baseline values were compared to data from matched healthy controls.
This study will assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of ACT-129968 in adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, due to mountain cedar pollen.
The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of bepotastine besilate nasal product in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.
Previous publications have indicated that Allergic Rhinitis (AR) patients suffering from both ocular and nasal symptoms have a greater burden of illness and lower quality of life than patients suffering from nasal symptoms alone. Fluticasone furoate (FF) acts against both nasal and ocular symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in symptom control (both perceptually and objectively) and resource use for patients with current seasonal AR.
The primary objective is to assess the effect of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) on the relative bioavailability (AUC0-∞) of fluticasone propionate (FLU) when administered as fixed AZE-FLU combination product (TEST) compared to a similar formulation without containing AZE (i.e. FLU alone in the MP29-02 vehicle; REF). The secondary objectives are to compare the relative bioavailability (AUC0-∞) of FLU when administered either as fixed AZE-FLU combination product (TEST) or as marketed FLU product, Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, Roxane Laboratories (COMP); To compare the effects of AZE on other pharmacokinetic parameters of FLU (AUC0 tlast, CL/f, Cmax, tmax, t½); To assess adverse events.
The primary objective is to assess the effect of fluticasone propionate (FLU) on the relative bioavailability (AUC0-∞) of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) when administered as fixed AZE-FLU combination product (TEST) compared to a similar formulation without containing FLU (i.e. AZE alone; REF). The secondary objectives are to compare the relative bioavailability (AUC0-∞) of AZE when administered either as fixed AZE-FLU combination product (TEST) or as marketed AZE product Astelin® Nasal Spray (COMP); To compare the effects of FLU on other pharmacokinetic parameters of AZE (AUC0-tlast, CL/f, Cmax, tmax, t½); To assess adverse events.
Subjects who have a clinical history of perennial rhinitis symptoms associated with dust exposure or not associated with other perennial allergens, will have a positive challenge with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. Subjects will be ppt negative and intradermal skin test positive to Dust p Challenges will be performed with placebo or Dp extract three times daily each for 2 weeks. Primary endpoint after nasal challenge with Dust p Mean Symptom score increase by greater than or equal to 2 from baseline. Secondary Outcomes Mean decrease in PNIF by greater than 15percent from baseline. Mean increase in nasal lavage PGD2 and ECP by greater than 15percent from baseline levels. Correlation between the orthogonol diameter of the wheal and flare of the intradermal skin test and the degree of symptom worsening during the nasal challenge. These results will provide evidence for the continued use of the intradermal skin test in evaluating allergic rhinitis.
To report and compare total symptom scores, nasal symptom scores, post-nasal drip symptom scores, and adverse reactions in and between SAR subjects on active drug and SAR subjects on placebo.