View clinical trials related to Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial.
Filter by:The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in adult participants with perennial allergic rhinitis. The study will last about 18 months
Single dose (four sprays) bioequivalence study of Azelastine Hydrochloride/ Fluticasone Propionate 137 microgram/50 microgram Nasal Spray and 'DYMISTA' (Azelastine Hydrochloride/Fluticasone Propionate) Nasal Spray 137 microgram/50 microgram in healthy adult human subjects.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Azelastine HCl-Fluticasone propionate Nasal Spray 137-50 mcg/spray compared to Dymista™ in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis
Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter of 3 active treatment groups, compared to 1 placebo group, for the determination of the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy in patients with mild to moderate asthma and rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis (intermittent or persistent) allergic to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and/or Dermatophagoides farinae.
Allergic rhinitis in children is common. According to the international study of asthma and allergies in childhood (ISAAC) phase III, the global prevalence of allergic rhinitis among children is increasing to 40.1% and the prevalence of allergic rhinitis in Bangkok area in 2018, among children aged 6-7 and 13-14 years was 16.32%. This disease is a global health problem affecting quality of life of patients in daily life, work, study and sleep. Intranasal corticosteroid is the most effective treatment for allergic rhinitis. From real world evidence; most of allergic rhinitis patient use the drug when symptoms worsen. In children, the use of intranasal corticosteroid may cause minor local side effects such as dryness, burning sensation or epistaxis. In some intranasal corticosteroid, long-term use may result in decreased growth compared to placebo which make parents concern. The investigators interested in studying the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid comparing between daily use and as needed use in children with allergic rhinitis. To study the appropriate form of treatment to increase cooperation. Patient will have a better quality of life and reduce the risk of side effects from prolonged use of intranasal corticosteroid. From the literature review, it was found that most studies were conducted among adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis In Thailand in 2020, Thongngam et al. studied the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid was compared between daily use and as needed use in adult patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. The results of the study concluded that the daily use group can reduced more TNSS (total nasal symptoms score) but was not statistically significant and had a greater increase in peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) compared to as needed group. Interestingly, the quality of life assessment (RCQ-36 score) in both2 groups improved equally, In as needed group, the cumulative dose was 51% lower than the daily dose group. The investigators want to compare the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid between daily versus as needed use in children with perennial allergic rhinitis which had not been studied before.
Alleviation of allergic symptoms induced by house dust mites when using the medical device AM-301. This clinical investigation explores the efficacy and safety of AM-301 when used to reduce symptoms of house dust mite sufferers. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of AM-301 Device between treated and non-treated subjects in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).
Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter of 3 active treatment groups, compared to 1 placebo group, for the determination of the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy in patients with mild to moderate asthma and allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis (intermittent or persistent) due to hypersensitivity to house dust mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and / or D. farinae) and grass pollen
Investigator examines the past prescription patterns and the reasons for the change of prescription to Monterizine capsules for Perennial Allergic Rhinitis patients with Asthma who will be taking Monterizine capsules to treat allergic rhinitis. After being given Monterizine capsules, Investigator evaluates the therapeutic effectiveness and safety for 3 months (or 6 months).
This prospective multicentric academic NAPT study aims to compile a database of all patients who initiate immunotherapy. The NAPT will take place before, during and after AIT to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of the treatment. The study consists of 4 visits and 2 telephone contacts that are repeated annually for 3 years. This study will be conducted in 2 hospitals: UZ Leuven and AZ ST. Jan Brugge on the consultation Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases (ENT) and the department of Internal Medicine / Allergology
40 allergic rhinitis patients in the acute phase will be enrolled in the study. All the allergic patients should be confirmed those who are over 20 years old and hypersensitive to house dust mite allergens confirmed by MAST test before study. All patients were treated with mixed formula of Chinese medicine for one months.