Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06435793 |
Other study ID # |
P2024/081 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 18, 2024 |
Est. completion date |
September 18, 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2024 |
Source |
Laboratory of Movement, Condorcet, Tournai, Belgium |
Contact |
Eliot Rudy Mbolo Ebubu (MD, PhD candidate) |
Phone |
0032485114738 |
Email |
535678[@]umons.ac.be |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The present study aims at enhancing our understanding of the influence of the mouthpiece
configuration on the amplitude of oral pressures generated during a maximum expiratory
pressure maneuver and on the neuromuscular recruitment of expiratory muscles (more
specifically of the internal oblique and the transverse abdominal muscles).
Incidentally, it also aims at clarifying the role of orofacial muscles, if any, in the
neuromuscular recruitment of the aforementioned muscles.
Description:
Enhancing our understanding of the influence of the mouthpiece configuration on oral
pressures and on the neuromuscular recruitment of the internal oblique and the transverse
abdominal muscles during a maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) maneuver is the primary goal of
this study
Maximal Respiratory Mouth Pressures (MIP and MEP):
Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) are commonly used
indices to assess respiratory muscle strength at the mouth.
MIP measures the strength of inspiratory muscles, while MEP assesses expiratory muscle
strength.
These measurements are simple, convenient, and noninvasive. However, clear standards for
these measurements are not well-established.
Choice of Mouthpiece:
We propose exploring different mouthpiece designs to know their impact on pressure
measurements.
Influence of Mouthpiece Design:
The type of mouthpiece used can affect pressure measurements. Some investigators recommend
including a small leak in the measuring circuit to dissipate pressure generated in the mouth
and minimize measurement errors.
However, specific studies focusing on the influence of mouthpiece design on MEP and
neuromuscular recruitment of expiratory muscles (such as the internal oblique and transverse
muscles) during MEP maneuvers would be valuable.
Additional Considerations:
Factors like body position (sitting vs. half-lying) may also impact pressure measurements,
although no significant differences were found in one study.
Among the objectives of our study, we aim at exploring ways to improve the accuracy and
reliability of respiratory pressure measurements.
In summary, understanding the impact of mouthpiece design on oral pressures during MEP
maneuvers is essential for accurate assessment of respiratory muscle function. Further
research in this area could provide valuable insights for clinical practice and pulmonary
function laboratories.