Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05708287 |
Other study ID # |
HMO-20-0260 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 1, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2022 |
Source |
Hadassah Medical Organization |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is increasingly used for hypoxemic respiratory
failure and is proving useful in avoiding or delaying intubation and mechanical ventilation.
However, basic information regarding the physiologic effects of this method is missing. In
this study, the effects of oxygen delivery by HFNC on oxygenation, ventilation and
cardiovascular vital signs in patients with mild hypoxemic respiratory failure were
evaluated.
Description:
Oxygen (O2) therapy delivered by means of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) is being
increasingly used. This device, capable of delivering high flow, oxygen enriched gas, has
been shown to reduce intubation rates in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. The
primary components of HFNC are "nasal prongs" (or cannulae) that are inserted into the
nostrils, a device which provides a warmed and humidified air / oxygen mixture and regulators
that control oxygen concentration, temperature and total gas flow. Commercially available
systems can deliver up to 40 - 60 liters per minute (LPM) of oxygen flow.
This method of non-invasive oxygen delivery has several presumed important working
principals. Firstly, the high flow rate may meet the patient's own inspiratory flow rate.
This enables accurate delivery of a high fractional inspired concentration of oxygen (FiO2).
Second, the high gas flow might also produce a certain degree of Continuous Positive Airway
Pressure (CPAP). In addition, the heated and humidified gas might also wash out/reduce the
physiological airway dead space of the patient. Furthermore, HFNC is more comfortable and
might be better tolerated than other Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) devices, such as Bi-level
positive airway pressure (BiPAP). This, in turn, can prolong the time the patient is
comfortably connected to the HFNC device.
Information regarding the basic physiologic influence of HFNC on oxygenation, ventilation and
vital signs is missing in the literature. Patients with mild respiratory failure provide an
opportunity to examine this topic. On one hand, these patients suffer from respiratory
failure manifested by hypoxemia, on the other hand the respiratory failure is mild to the
extent that removal of the conventional oxygen therapy (COT) will not lead to immediate
respiratory collapse. This prospective study evaluates the physiologic effects of HFNC in 28
patients with mild respiratory failure.