View clinical trials related to Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Filter by:The adequate characterization of RV injury is currently unknown. The hypothesis is that the best characterization of RV injury is the one with the most significant impact on the response to fluids and on the outcome. An RV failure is expected to induce fluid-unresponsiveness and potentially worst outcome. The main objective is to characterize different types of RV injury in critically ill patients by examining their association, including predictive performances, in hemodynamics parameters, ventilation parameters, and clinical outcomes The study will be based on the realisation of an echocardiography within 48 hours following inclusion.
Allogeneic culture-expanded bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are the subject of the current study as they are supported by preclinical and clinical data for potential to provide a safe and effective treatment for patients with acute respiratory distress.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a clinical syndrome of inflammatory lung injury characterized by increased pulmonary vascular permeability, loss of aerated lung tissue, severe hypoxemia and impaired compliance. Despite the advance in the critical care technology, the mortality of ARDS remains high in the last decades. Glucocorticoids have profound anti-inflammatory actions through the pleiotropic effects of the glucocorticoid receptor, which are considering a promising pharmacological therapy to mitigate the inflammatory lung injury and subsequent fibrosis in ARDS. Previous clinical trials have repeatedly tested the efficacy of glucocorticoid therapy in ARDS; however, the data about hard outcomes, such as mortality, are inconsistent between these studies. Investigators designed a 3x2 factorial trial of glucocorticoid therapy in ARDS to test the effects of glucocorticoid dosages (dose 0, dose 0.5 mg/kg, and dose 1 mg/kg of methylprednisolone equivalence) and durations (prolonged and short duration) on the treatment efficacy. In addition, investigators will measure the change of inflammatory biomarkers for post-hoc analysis to explore whether biomarkers could be used to guide patient selection and steroid tapering.
ARDS caused by pneumonia is one of the main reasons for ICU admission in critically ill patients, and also a common complication in patients admitted to ICU with invasive mechanical ventilation. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is the main diagnostic method for these patients, which often leads to alveolar collapse and exacerbates hypoxemia. In clinical practice, recruitment maneuver (RM) is often used immediately after BAL to prevent such a situation, but there is a lack of data on RM after BAL.
This is a Phase 1, multi-center, dose escalation study that is followed by a Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of WP1122 administered q12h ±1 hr PO in adult patients with COVID-19 who require hospitalization with respiratory support. The Phase 1 component will enroll COVID-19 positive patients who are symptomatic and the Phase 2 component will enroll adults with COVID-19 who require hospitalization for respiratory support and those patients requiring intubation with mechanical ventilation.
Aortic dissection (AD) is one of the most dangerous cardiovascular emergencies, with rapid onset, rapid progression, high fatality rate, and a variety of life-threatening complications. Acute lung injury (ALI) caused by AD is an important cause of many adverse outcomes. Studies have confirmed that 34.9% to 53.8% of AAD patients have ALI before surgery, and Impaired preoperative lung function may lead to worse oxygenation after AD surgery. The pathophysiological mechanism of AD-induced ALI is complex. A variety of preoperative and intraoperative risk factors can induce or aggravate ALI, such as ischemia-reperfusion injury, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, and inflammatory reactions. At present, the clinical use of improved surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion, early anti-inflammatory treatment, and protective lung ventilation can reduce and improve perioperative ALI to a certain extent, but it is still not ideal. In recent years, inhibition of neutrophil activation and aggregation, and reduction of neutrophil elastase activity as targets for the treatment of inflammatory injury have also become an important clinical treatment measure, in order to further reduce the body's inflammatory response to improve and alleviate ALI. Sivelestat sodium, as a neutrophil elastase inhibitor, is the only approved therapeutic drug for ALI/ acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the world. It is precisely by reducing the inflammatory infiltration of neutrophils and inhibiting neutrophil elastase activity, thereby exerting a certain protective effect on the lungs. The study takes patients with AD surgery as the research object. On the basis of not terminating and changing the original treatment plans, sivelestat sodium was added in the perioperative period to observe the incidence, and severity of ALI/ARDS in the perioperative period. It aims to explore the efficacy and safety of sivelestat sodium in the treatment of pulmonary insufficiency after AD arch surgery under hypothermic circulatory arrest.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a lesional pulmonary edema that occurs as a result of direct or indirect lung injury. This condition accounts for 10-15% of ICU admissions and 20-25% of patients admitted require invasive ventilation. Its incidence has increased markedly with the Covid-19 epidemic. ARDS is defined as hypoxemia (Pa02/Fi02 < 300 mmHg) in ventilated patients without heart failure. Currently, the recommendations of the resuscitation societies advocate a management combining invasive ventilation, short duration curarization and prone sessions. In case of failure of these therapies, venovenous ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO) is recommended in case of Pa02/Fi02 < 80 mmHg. Nevertheless, approximately 40% of patients have refractory and persistent hypoxemia despite optimization of ECMO parameters and invasive ventilation. The refractory hypoxemia is defined as Pa02 < 55 mmHg and/or Sa02 < 90% and may be due to a recirculation phenomenon or a significant intra-pulmonary shunt. Currently, there is no official recommendation for the management of these patients, leading to the use of various unvalidated field practices. In addition, hospital mortality of the order of 60% is observed in these patients with high management costs. Some data in the literature suggest that induced therapeutic hypothermia (HT) at 34°C for 48 hours could improve the prognosis of these patients by improving oxygenation. Nevertheless, the level of evidence of published studies remains low because they are either case reviews or studies whose methodology does not guarantee the absence of potential bias. The research hypothesis is that HT at 34°C or 33°C for 48 hours is effective on refractory hypoxemia.
COVID-19 has multiple facets including cytokine storm, thromboembolism and gelatinous secretions. It is known that oxygen exchange is the main problem in patients with COVID-19 and hypoxia is one of the most serious, in which patients succumb to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In other severe respiratory disease such as ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), formation of biofilm in the endotracheal tube causes infection to spread to the lungs, resulting in respiratory decline and high mortality. The development of gelatinous sputum plugs correlates with negative outcome. Both groups of patients still have limited therapy options. BromAc is a potent mucolytic, biofilm degrader, cleaves the glycoproteins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (antiviral), and down regulates cytokines and chemokine in COVID-19 sputum. The investigators seek to examine the safety and attempt to gain preliminary efficacy of nebulised BromAc in moderate to severe COVID-19 and other mucus producing, severe, respiratory diseases.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has been a global pandemic since March 2020. According to WHO, more than 289 million cases have been confirmed worldwide, with just over 5.4 million reported deaths as of January 2022. SARS-CoV-2 variants continue to emerge, with the omicron variant causing the increased surge in cases. Currently, Johns Hopkins University of Medicine reports a case fatality rate of 1.5% for the United States. COVID-19 infections may be asymptomatic in some cases, while most cases cause mild to moderate illness with respiratory and flu-like symptoms. However, a significant number of COVID-19 cases develop severe life-threatening illness involving severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) Although there have been breakthroughs in the treatment for COVID-19, most of these are directed at mild-to-moderate disease rather than patients with severe disease on mechanical ventilators. There is still a need for novel and effective treatment options in severe COVID-19 illness with continued vaccine hesitancy, decreased social distancing, and new emerging variants. Centhaquine is a first-in-class resuscitative agent for the hypovolemic shock that is approved for marketing in India. Centhaquine has been found to be an effective resuscitative agent in rat, rabbit, and swine models of hemorrhagic shock. Its safety and tolerability have been demonstrated in a human phase I study in 25 subjects (CTRI/2014/06/004647). Clinical phase II (CTRI/2017/03/008184) and phase III (CTRI/2019/01/017196) results indicate that centhaquine is a novel first-in-class, highly effective resuscitative agent for hypovolemic shock. Centhaquine provided hemodynamic stability and significantly improved acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) in clinical trials conducted in India. A total of 155 patients with hypovolemic shock have been studied (combined phase II and III). Centhaquine is safe and reduced the mortality from 10.71% in patients receiving standard treatment to 2.20% in patients that received centhaquine (odds ratio 5.340; 95% CI 1.270-26.50; P=0.0271). In a phase 3 study of hypovolemic shock, ARDS and MODS were secondary endpoints, and centhaquine reduced both with a significant p-value.
Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm neonates has traditionally been limited to between 5-8 cmH2O. In recent years, use of CPAP pressures ≥9 cmH2O is becoming more common in neonates with evolving chronic lung disease, in lieu of other non-invasive modes or invasive mechanical ventilation. A particular knowledge gap in the current literature is the choice of the level of pressure level when using High CPAP as a post-extubation support mode. In this study, we will comparatively evaluate the short-term impact of two different high CPAP pressures when used as a post-extubation support mode in preterm neonates.