View clinical trials related to Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Filter by:This study is a multicentric randomized controlled study.The objective of this study is to compare the prognosis of patients with ARDS between EIT-oriented individualized PEEP and traditional lower PEEP/FiO2 table-oriented PEEP strategy.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a lesional pulmonary edema that occurs as a result of direct or indirect lung injury. This condition accounts for 10-15% of ICU admissions and 20-25% of patients admitted require invasive ventilation. Its incidence has increased markedly with the Covid-19 epidemic. ARDS is defined as hypoxemia (Pa02/Fi02 < 300 mmHg) in ventilated patients without heart failure. Currently, the recommendations of the resuscitation societies advocate a management combining invasive ventilation, short duration curarization and prone sessions. In case of failure of these therapies, venovenous ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO) is recommended in case of Pa02/Fi02 < 80 mmHg. Nevertheless, approximately 40% of patients have refractory and persistent hypoxemia despite optimization of ECMO parameters and invasive ventilation. The refractory hypoxemia is defined as Pa02 < 55 mmHg and/or Sa02 < 90% and may be due to a recirculation phenomenon or a significant intra-pulmonary shunt. Currently, there is no official recommendation for the management of these patients, leading to the use of various unvalidated field practices. In addition, hospital mortality of the order of 60% is observed in these patients with high management costs. Some data in the literature suggest that induced therapeutic hypothermia (HT) at 34°C for 48 hours could improve the prognosis of these patients by improving oxygenation. Nevertheless, the level of evidence of published studies remains low because they are either case reviews or studies whose methodology does not guarantee the absence of potential bias. The research hypothesis is that HT at 34°C or 33°C for 48 hours is effective on refractory hypoxemia.
The aim of the study is to determine the preferred oximeter averaging setting during automated control of FiO2 (A-FiO2) in infants receiving respiratory support and supplemental oxygen.
Non-invasive respiratory support methods have been widely used in premature babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) which has changed the basic management of premature babies in the early period. According to the 2019 European Guidelines on RDS management, early nasal CPAP is recommended as first-line therapy in infants <30 weeks of age who are at risk of RDS who do not require mechanical ventilation (MV). However, some of the premature babies have faced non-invasive ventilation failure. Remarkably, infants who experience non-invasive ventilation failure are at increased risk of death, pneumothorax, intraventricular hemorrhage, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), among other morbidities. In non-invasive ventilation failure, although demographic factors such as small gestational age, low birth weight, and male gender play a role, it has been suggested that surfactant deficiency may also play an important role. The most frequently reported risk factor in predicting non-invasive failure in studies is the fraction of inspiring oxygen during the first hours of life. In addition, positive end-expiratory airway pressure (PEEP) required for patient stabilization was found to be a potential predictor. However, there are still limited data to predict non-invasive ventilation failure. "Which newborns are at high risk for non-invasive ventilation failure?" and "When should the surfactant be applied?". The study is a single-center, prospective study to evaluate prognostic factors, and most importantly to define the FiO2 threshold, which is an indicator of possible non-invasive ventilation failure in infants supported with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation.
The American European Consensus Conference (AECC) 1994 defined acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) as an acute inflammatory syndrome manifesting as diffuse pulmonary edema and respiratory failure that cannot be explained by, but may co-exist with, left-sided heart failure. During the sequel Conference of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, in 2012 minor changes were made, and since that so-called Berlin definition of ARDS is used worldwide for the description of this severe disease. Three grades of severity were proposed to distinguish ARDS according to the level of hypoxemia with a mortality of 24% in patients with mild ARDS, rising to 48% in those with severe ones. Systemic inflammation is considered to be the main reason of ARDS. Activated neutrophils interact with the alveolar-capillary membrane causing the increasing permeability with the sequence lung edema's development. Inflammatory exudate inactivates surfactant leading to collapse and consolidation of distal airspaces with progressive loss of the lung's gas exchange surface area. Unfortunately, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) simultaneously inhibits the mechanism of active pulmonary vasoconstriction and allows deoxygenated blood to pass through unventilated areas of the lung boosting the right-to-left shunt. Both mechanisms lead to hypoxemia, which is the main and obligatory feature of ARDS. Actually, endothelial dysfunction and transcapillary leakage seem to be one of the main steps in the development of respiratory failure during ARDS. Last decades it was found out that glycocalyx is also participating in this process too. Thus, it became clear that substances preserving endothelium and glycocalyx from SIRS-causing damage may have a beneficial effect in ARDS treatment. It seems to be crucially important so as the majority of drugs failed to demonstrate any positive effects in terms of ARDS treatment. To the moment we have some evidence, which came from experimental studies, that halogenated anesthetics can preserve glycocalyx against ischemia-reperfusion injury. The primary objective for the multicentral INVERSE Trial will be to determine the effects of inhalational (sevoflurane) versus intravenous (propofol) sedation on P/F ratio on the second day, hospital mortality and ICU (intensive care unit), and in-hospital length of stay in adults with a moderate form of ARDS.
COVID-19 has multiple facets including cytokine storm, thromboembolism and gelatinous secretions. It is known that oxygen exchange is the main problem in patients with COVID-19 and hypoxia is one of the most serious, in which patients succumb to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In other severe respiratory disease such as ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), formation of biofilm in the endotracheal tube causes infection to spread to the lungs, resulting in respiratory decline and high mortality. The development of gelatinous sputum plugs correlates with negative outcome. Both groups of patients still have limited therapy options. BromAc is a potent mucolytic, biofilm degrader, cleaves the glycoproteins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (antiviral), and down regulates cytokines and chemokine in COVID-19 sputum. The investigators seek to examine the safety and attempt to gain preliminary efficacy of nebulised BromAc in moderate to severe COVID-19 and other mucus producing, severe, respiratory diseases.
An informational evaluation of COVID-19 patients who receive low-level laser therapy in addition to a normal regimen of treatment for symptoms associate with COVID-19. Results are compared to statistical observations published in literature from patients receiving standard care for COVID-19 symptoms without low-level laser therapy.
The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of online formative feedback and debriefing on nursing and medical students enrolled in the HBB course in comparison to traditional face-to-face feedback. The working hypothesis is that online feedback and debriefing during hands-on training sessions are as effective as face-to-face feedback and debriefing in teaching clinical skills to medical and nursing students.
Respiratory failure associated with Covid-19 can be expressed as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is an acute inflammatory lung injury,which generally requires the use of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). There are inconclusive results regarding the potential lung recruitment in ARDS. At the lung level, the relationship between lung volume and pressure can be graphed through a pressure/volume (P/V) curve. In this curve, hysteresis (H) can be evaluated, which is the amount of energy generated during inspiration that is not recovered during expiration. H is related to recruitment, assuming that the greater H the greater the alveolar recruitment. For this reason, the objective of this study is the measurement of H as a way to assess the lung recruitment capacity, in patients with ARDS and in patients with Covid-19 who develop ARDS (ARDS- Covid)
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has been a global pandemic since March 2020. According to WHO, more than 289 million cases have been confirmed worldwide, with just over 5.4 million reported deaths as of January 2022. SARS-CoV-2 variants continue to emerge, with the omicron variant causing the increased surge in cases. Currently, Johns Hopkins University of Medicine reports a case fatality rate of 1.5% for the United States. COVID-19 infections may be asymptomatic in some cases, while most cases cause mild to moderate illness with respiratory and flu-like symptoms. However, a significant number of COVID-19 cases develop severe life-threatening illness involving severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) Although there have been breakthroughs in the treatment for COVID-19, most of these are directed at mild-to-moderate disease rather than patients with severe disease on mechanical ventilators. There is still a need for novel and effective treatment options in severe COVID-19 illness with continued vaccine hesitancy, decreased social distancing, and new emerging variants. Centhaquine is a first-in-class resuscitative agent for the hypovolemic shock that is approved for marketing in India. Centhaquine has been found to be an effective resuscitative agent in rat, rabbit, and swine models of hemorrhagic shock. Its safety and tolerability have been demonstrated in a human phase I study in 25 subjects (CTRI/2014/06/004647). Clinical phase II (CTRI/2017/03/008184) and phase III (CTRI/2019/01/017196) results indicate that centhaquine is a novel first-in-class, highly effective resuscitative agent for hypovolemic shock. Centhaquine provided hemodynamic stability and significantly improved acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) in clinical trials conducted in India. A total of 155 patients with hypovolemic shock have been studied (combined phase II and III). Centhaquine is safe and reduced the mortality from 10.71% in patients receiving standard treatment to 2.20% in patients that received centhaquine (odds ratio 5.340; 95% CI 1.270-26.50; P=0.0271). In a phase 3 study of hypovolemic shock, ARDS and MODS were secondary endpoints, and centhaquine reduced both with a significant p-value.