View clinical trials related to Rehabilitation.
Filter by:Although some western studies have been conducted to determine the nature of eating problems and oral motor training in children with Down syndrome, these studies are limited. Most of the studies were done in Down syndrome infants. Since feeding is a skill that develops by 2 years of age and refines till 6 years of age (Delaney & Arvedson 2008), it is essential to study the children in this age group as well. Moreover, there is a dearth of studies investigating the impact of oral motor exercises on feeding problems of the child, which may, in turn, hinder the progress of the child during the intervention. Blissett J., (2018) reported that the behaviours of both caretaker, therapist and infant during feeding contribute significantly to the overall success of the feeding interaction as well as feeding performance. Parents/caregivers play an important role in feeding the child, as they have the first-hand exposure and experience in feeding their child, awareness of the child's feeding behaviours, likes and dislikes of food and communication behaviour during hunger. Consequently, they are the best people to describe their child's feeding problems. Hence, this study involves the administration of a scale on the parent/caregiver to elicit information about the physical, functional and emotional aspects of drooling. Such studies in the Egyptian context are limited. The paucity of literature makes it clear that there are deeper underlying complex issues about oral motor exercises in children with Down syndrome that needs to be investigated. The in-depth assessment and treatment of oral motor skills will provide valuable input to the physical therapists during the treatment of feeding problems in children with Down syndrome. This would help the therapist and clinician in planning and prioritizing the goals during therapy. The information will also help in counselling the caregivers, deciding the success or failure of feeding therapy and thereby help in predicting the prognosis of the child.
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly transmittable and pathogenic viral infection caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2), which emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019 and its spread around the world has been rapid (Rathi et al., 2021; Vakili et al., 2021). COVID-19 impacts on economy, society, education , neurological, psychiatric and psychosocial impairments , increasing the burden of disease and disability throughout the world have been studied by several authors (Phillips et al., 2020; Pragholapati, 2020). COVID-19 may lead to greater risks of long-term scarring, permanently lower economic activity, a significant increase in the prevalence of chronic illness, social distancing, isolation, changes in teaching and learning strategies to decrease of number of days of education, the number of social contacts each day is limited (Minister & Majesty, 2020; Almomani et al., 2021) .
Standard risk prediction models in cardiac surgery (such as EuroSCORE II or STS score) are designed to analyze solely the risk of short-term postoperative mortality. The postoperative morbidity, the ability to rehabilitate or the mid-term survival are not addressed by these means. Recently there have been some reports that addition of physical performance testing to the standard prediction models may provide prognostic value. There is a wide scale of various physical performance and frailty tests that could be used for this purpose, but they have not been confronted with each other yet. Moreover, the postoperative physical rehabilitation has not been objectively assessed in larger scale despite the significant improvement in technology. The hypothesisis of the study is that the preoperative outcomes of physical performance and frailty testing are able to predict the patient's reconvalescence after cardiac surgery in the short- and mid-term postoperatively. The aim is to analyze a set of tests with regard to their ability to predict postoperative reconvalescence, including the objective activity assessment (using Actigraph wGT3X-BT activity tracking device). Secondarily, the investigators aim to follow the patients up to 1 year postoperatively in terms of evaluating their mid-term outcomes.
The study aims to evaluate whether an intervention with patient education in study circles, aiming to empower patients to participate in health care an rehabilitation by increasing health literacy and sense of coherence, may have a causal effect on perceived health, ability and function as well as independence and quality of life for patients with long-term health-related disabilities and passive coping strategies.
Introduction: Following pulmonary transplantation (PT), peripheral and respiratory muscle weakness, and associated global malfunction are some of the limiting factors in rapid recovery. Effective early implantation pulmonary rehabilitation programs are currently lacking. Objectives: To introduce an early rehabilitation program in the ICU after PT to see if there is an improvement in functionality, an increase in strength and muscle mass, an improvement in the strength of the respiratory muscles and a shorter hospitalization time in the ICU and in the ward. Methodology: A single-blind randomized clinical trial will be performed to divide patients with PT into one experimental group and another control group. Prior to the PT, those patients between the ages of 18 and 70 will be recruited, to be admitted to the ICU of Vall Hebron University Hospital, and who have been prescribed pulmonary rehabilitation with onset in the first 15 days after the surgery. The control group receives regular treatment in the ICU, which includes muscle strengthening exercises, passive/assisted or active mobilizations, and respiratory physiotherapy with breathing muscle strengthening in a medium load. The experimental group receives a new early rehabilitation program based on a patient's in-bed cycling that allows controlled and adapted training to the patient's situation, along with coordinated exercise with neuromuscular electrostimulation and respiratory physiotherapy with breathing muscle strengthening in a high load. Improvement will be observed through functional scales (6MWT), muscle dynamometry, manual muscle test (MRC-SumScore), bioimpedanciometry, inspiratory and maximal expiratory pressures, spirometry, frailty and sarcopenia tests and a long-term Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Expected Outcomes: Patients who perform the experimental group are expected to have an early discharge from the ICU and a reduction of the total hospital admission. Is also expected that the experimental group will improve the functional capacity and muscular strength, and they will have a lower risk of fragility in long term. It is also expected that the patients in the experimental group will soon be able to normalize their oxygen consumption a year after lung transplantation.
Why? There is not much information in the UK on how well patients who sustain major trauma function afterwards. Major trauma is defined as significant injuries with a calculated 'injury severity score' (ISS) over 15. The ISS is calculated based on how many parts of the body are injured and how badly injured these are, up to a maximum score of 75 (fatal). We feel that learning more about how these people cope afterwards, and what influences this will allow us to improve the care we can deliver in the future, which will hopefully lead to better outcomes. What? We propose to implement the FIT (Functional outcomes In Trauma) study to assess how well patients function physically, psychologically and socially, and get back to activities of daily living, work and participation in recreational activities following major trauma. Who? Major trauma patients: 2 cohorts: prospectively going forwards in time (from baseline to 12 months after trauma) and retrospectively going backwards in time (patients between 2-10 years after trauma). Where? Leeds General Infirmary. How? We will do this by collecting data from questionnaires completed by patients (also known as PROMS, or Patient Reported Outcome Measures), using an online questionnaire service developed at the University of Leeds, called QTool. These will offer the participants the chance to tell us how they are doing across lots of areas, with both tick-box multiple choice questions and open-ended questions to explain how they are doing and what influences this. We will also interview a random selection of patients in further detail to discuss how their trauma has affected them, how they found the study, how we could improve it. Afterwards we will send participants a copy of what we have learnt from the study and aim to publish it in a scientific journal. Timeline/Phase overview: The FIT Study will consist of 2 phases. Phase 1 will last for 2 years in total (12 months for prospective study cohort recruitment and 12 months follow-up for these patients) during which time data will be collected from the retrospective cohort as well. Following this there will be a full analysis of the data, after which phase 2 of the FIT Study will begin. Patients enrolled into phase 1 of the study will be given the option of consenting to being contacted annually to complete the same set of online PROMs, which will comprise phase 2 of the study. We will also continue active recruitment into both prospective and retrospective arms of the study in phase 2. We plan to continue data collection on an annual basis up to 10 years post trauma in phase 2 of the study for patients in both cohorts. We hope to incorporate elements of the FIT Study into future routine care with what we learn from the FIT Study, and develop our own unique Patient Reported Outcome Measure tool, with the overall aim of improving patient care and outcomes.
Pre-arthritic hip disorders can cause pain, interfere with daily activities and exercise, and lead to the development of osteoarthritis in young adults. Surgical and conservative treatment options are being developed and studied, but it is currently unclear why some patients improve with a particular treatment plan while others do not. The goal of this research project is to develop a tool that predicts which combination of treatment options will be most effective for each individual patient.
Study with Patients (40-60 participants) above the age of 65. There will be a comparison of regular training on ergometer (10 trainings within 2 weeks, 40 min each) to high intensity interval training on ergometer (6 trainings within 2 weeks, 25 min each). At the beginning and at the end will be a spiroergometer to measure the individual limits and vO2max, which will be compared amongst the two groups. To receive a subjective feedback, there will be a series of questionnaires at the beginning, after one week and at the end. The goal of this study is to get more information about whether a HII-Training is feasible with elderly patients and whether they can profit form it.
The main objective of the study is to describe function and health related to quality of life during the first year after rehabilitation, to measure the degree and impact of user involvement in the rehabilitation process, assess factors associated with change in work -ability and -participation, and to test measurement properties of a new core set of outcome measures for rehabilitation launched by the Norwegian Directorate of Health.
Registry database of intensive care patients. These data comprises of routine data including mobilization data and follow up assessments.