Clinical Trials Logo

Rectocele clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Rectocele.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02800512 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

Start date: December 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of R-SCP versus HUSLS for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

NCT ID: NCT02659176 Completed - Rectocele Clinical Trials

Trans-perineal Repair With or Without Limited Internal Sphincterotomy for Treatment of Type I Anterior Rectocele

Start date: January 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Comparison between transperineal repair of rectocele with or without posterior internal sphincterotomy.

NCT ID: NCT02449915 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Improvement of Pain Following Robotic Sacrocolpopexy and Rectocele Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Start date: March 2015
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

To determine if the injection of liposomal bupivacaine to laparoscopic port sites and rectocele repair incisions at the completion of a robotic sacrocolpopexy with concomitant rectocele repair will result in decreased postoperative pain compared to injection of placebo.

NCT ID: NCT02280382 Completed - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

An Intervention to Improve Prolapse Using Femmeze® (v1)

Femmeze®
Start date: October 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The main purpose of the feasibility study is to identify the patient experience of Femmeze® which is a device aimed at improving posterior vaginal compartment prolapse (rectocele) for women with obstructive defaecation. The investigators want to investigate implementation and preliminary effectiveness of the device. The method of investigation will be a pre-post intervention design, which involves asking 30 women to use Femmeze® over a period of 8 weeks. This is an academic study on a labelled indication (http://www.nres.nhs.uk/search/?q=medical+devices).

NCT ID: NCT02231099 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery

VROUW2
Start date: January 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pelvic organ prolapse is highly prevalent in the female population. The recurrence rate of pelvic organ prolapse after surgical treatment is high. This emphasizes the clinical need for improvement of the surgical techniques currently used. Placement of a mesh aims at reducing the recurrence rate. In this study the investigators compare the effectiveness of the Tension free Vaginal mesh + Monocryl with standard vaginal prolapse surgery without mesh.

NCT ID: NCT02052063 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

Does the Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR Procedure) Has an Effect on Anal Compliance ?

Compli-STARR
Start date: September 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) has recently been recommended for patients with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) caused by rectocele and rectal wall intussusception. The aim of STARR is to correct the mechanical outlet obstruction using a stapler device for endorectal resection of the distal rectum. This technique significantly improves constipation. However, there are several reports of new-onset faecal incontinence after STARR and urgency has been identified as the major side-effect of this procedure. Although this technique has become an important surgical option in the treatment of obstructive defaecation syndrome, its impact on continence can be problematic and objective data about parameters that predict its result are not yet available One study evaluated the anal function after surgery in 30 patients. In this study, urgency or incontinence was complained by 26% of patients. No sonographically demonstrable sphincter fragmentations were noticed in the endoanal exam performed at the follow-up. No significant difference was observed in anorectal manometry. Even if data are not statistically significant, resting and squeezing pressures are lower in those patients not satisfied. Currently, anal canal pressure measurements using ano-rectal manometry are the most common means of assessment of sphincter function. Some studies have been looking at the concept of distending sphincter regions as a better measure of its performance. The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) is a novel technique which has the ability to provide real-time images of the function of human gastrointestinal sphincter during distension. This distensibility technique provides an important new way of studying the anal canal and hence may have a role in testing sphincter competence in patients with disorders after STARR procedure. Twenty-eight patients will be enrolled in this study over a period of 36 months. Preoperative assessment will include - clinical examination - the Wexner Incontinence Score and the Faecal Incontinence Quality-of-Life Index (FIQL) to rate anal incontinence - video defecography, anorectal manometry, anal ultrasound (AUS) and measure of anal sphincter distensibility using endoFLIP Follow-up evaluation will scheduled for 3 months after surgery, and will include symptom evaluation (using the same standard questionnaires for incontinence), clinical examination and investigation using anal ultrasound and endoFLIP. If we demonstrate that this surgical technique can cause anal lesions with decreased sphincter competence, this may lead to a modification of the surgical technique especially in patients at risk of developing postoperative anal incontinence.

NCT ID: NCT01899209 Recruiting - Rectal Prolapse Clinical Trials

Surgical Treatment of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome

PRO-REST
Start date: August 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Obstructed Defecation is a profoundly disabling condition. Many different surgical procedures has been introduced to treat patients affected by this disease. The most used are STARR and ventral rectopexy. Because of the heterogenity of studies and overall the lack of comparison trials, there is no accepted standard surgical treatment.PRO-REST aimed to compare these two procedures (STARR and Ventral Rectopexy) evaluating functional and anatomical results.

NCT ID: NCT01257659 Terminated - Rectocele Clinical Trials

STARR Trans-anal Resection Versus Vaginal Rectocele Repair Using Elevate: Effects on Defecatory Function

RectoVerso
Start date: September 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of this study is to compare the function results between two methods for surgically repairing rectoceles: vaginal versus endo-anal surgery. Our working hypothesis is that the relatively new type of endo-anal surgery will result in better voiding function compared to the traditional vaginal surgery.

NCT ID: NCT01097200 Active, not recruiting - Cystocele Clinical Trials

Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse

Start date: May 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pelvic prolapse is one of the most frequent pathology in Gynecology. Recurrency of the prolapse after primary surgery is relatively high, 15-30%. Sacrocolpopexy has showed to be effective but it requires a long learning curves and is more aggressive. New meshes techniques seem to be effective, as well, with less learning curve but they are expensive and there are no randomize studies published. The investigators aim is to compare both techniques in terms of: anatomical and functional efficacy, cost, operating time and complications.

NCT ID: NCT00988975 Recruiting - Rectocele Clinical Trials

Trial to Determine Which of Two Surgical Techniques Works Better to Correct Vaginal Bulging

Start date: September 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Women with vaginal bulging who are undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at Clarian Health are eligible to enroll in this study. Two different methods of correcting rectocele at the time of sacrocolpopexy will be compared for surgical outcome, surgical complications, and patient satisfaction with intercourse and bowel function. One of the surgical methods uses an additional graft material and one surgical method does not. It is hypothesized that the method which uses an additional graft material to strengthen the patient's tissues will have a better outcome.