View clinical trials related to Rectal Neoplasms.
Filter by:TME (Total mesorectum excision) is the golden standard of radical resection for mid-low rectal cancer. However, the damage of pelvic autonomic nerve following with TME principle will lead to high incidence of urinary and sexual function disorder. Open PANP (pelvic autonomic nerve preservation) TME surgery played a role in decreasing incidence of urinary and sexual function disorder. However, 32%-44% patients still suffered from urinary and sexual function disorder when underwent Open PANP TME surgery (O-PANP-TME). Laparoscopy-assisted TME surgery (L-TME) is applied wildly nowadays. In the early stage of work, we performed laparoscopy-assisted PANP TME surgery (L-PANP-TME) to discuss the protection of urinary and sexual function of male mid-low rectal cancer patients. The results showed that L-PANP-TME significantly decreased incidence of urinary and sexual function disorder. In order to further confirm our early work, we design a multiple-center randomized controlled clinical trial to compare differences in urinary and sexual function protection and long-term outcomes between L-PANP-TME and O-PANP-TME.
TME (Total mesorectum excision) is the golden standard of radical resection for mid-low rectal cancer. However, the damage of pelvic autonomic nerve following with TME principle will lead to high incidence of urinary and sexual function disorder. Open PANP (pelvic autonomic nerve preservation) TME surgery played a role in decreasing incidence of urinary and sexual function disorder. However, 32%-44% patients still suffered from urinary and sexual function disorder when underwent Open PANP TME surgery (O-PANP-TME). Laparoscopy-assisted TME surgery (L-TME) is applied wildly nowadays. In the early stage of work, we performed laparoscopy-assisted PANP TME surgery (L-PANP-TME) to discuss the protection of urinary and sexual function of male mid-low rectal cancer patients. The results showed that L-PANP-TME significantly decreased incidence of urinary and sexual function disorder. In order to further confirm our early work, we design a randomized controlled clinical trial to compare differences in urinary and sexual function protection and long-term outcomes between L-PANP-TME and O-PANP-TME.
Background: Meta-analyses of large randomized trials proved the superiority of preoperative short course radiation and surgery, as compared with surgery alone. Short course radiation results in a 50% reduction in terms of local relapse in stage II and III rectal cancer patients. Patients with complete pathological remission additionally show a significant survival benefit. Complete pathological remission (pCR) occurs in 8% after preoperative radiation and in >16% if the interval between radiation and surgery is at least 8 weeks. It is generally accepted that mutations in the TP53 gene represent a crucial defect in the apoptosis pathway. Radiation therapy is suggested to act via induction of apoptosis in irradiated cells. Therefore, it is expected that a defect in the TP53 gene has an effect on the success of radiation therapy. Currently available imaging tools are hardly able to diagnose response to radiation therapy correctly, as this does not essentially correlate with tumor size. Method: Aim of this prospective observation study is to strengthen the hypothesis that the TP53 genotype is a promising marker to predict response to radiation therapy in rectal cancer patients. Consequently, the expected results will justify prospective, randomized intervention trials to obtain level of evidence I for the p53 marker hypothesis. Trial endpoint is downstaging and pCR rate. Tumor stage and pathological remission will be evaluated by MRT and pathohistology and correlated to the TP53 genotype of the diagnostic biopsy. Additionally, we will investigate the applicability of novel imaging modalities in magnet resonance tomography to monitor response to radiotherapy. The objective of this study is - to evaluate the effect of a genetic tumor marker (TP53 genotype) on the response to preoperative short course radiation (in terms of downstaging and pCR rate) - to evaluate the applicability of novel magnet resonance tomography imaging modalities to monitor response to preoperative short time radiation. Conclusion: The prospective evaluation of the potential predictive marker TP53 may bring us one-step closer to an individualized therapy regimen, which allows the restriction of preoperative radiation in rectal cancer to those patients who will benefit.
Locally advanced rectal cancer (T3, T4 or lymph node positive tumors) are conventionally treated with 5FU / capecitabine based chemoradiation prior to surgical resection. This treatment is associated with only a 15-20% pathological complete response. Selinexor (KPT-330) is a Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) XPO1 antagonist that has demonstrated radiosensitization with in vivo models and has suggested single agent activity against colorectal cancers in a Phase I trial. Here we perform a Phase I/Ib trial of standard chemoradiation combined with Selinexor. We hypothesize that tumors treated with this new combination will demonstrate an increased response rate compared to those treated with capecitabine-radiation alone.
This study evaluates quality of life and utilities following surgical treatment of stage I-IV rectal cancer. This study may help researches learn more about quality of life in patients who have or have had rectal cancer.
Risk of local recurrence after rectal surgery is nationally 8% after curative surgery to 5%. Local recurrence rate after curative surgery varies between 3-7% in the variety of regions in the country. It is well known that the surgical technique total mesorectal excision (TME) has led to improved prognosis after rectal cancer surgery. TME surgery is difficult to perform and different factors affect the quality of TME preparations. Injuries in mesorectal fascia has been reported in up to 20% of patients who underwent TME surgery and most surgeons agree that this may be important for recurrences. However, it is unclear to what extent a damaged mesorectal fascia can be related to a worsening of prognosis in patients with rectal cancer. Adjuvant oncological treatment in form of chemotherapy after surgery, is offers patients with unfavorable tumors based on the pathological examination. Patients with favorable tumors (less advanced) are not offered chemotherapy, even if the surgical technique was not optimal, ie. that there is damage in the mesorectal fascia, as evidence for this is lacking. The presence of intraperitoneal cancer cells (IPC) is related to histopathological tumor stage of colorectal cancer. Incidence of IPC of intraperitoneal tumors (rectal cancer patients with tumors below the peritoneal reflection) is unclear. Assessment of IPC status with cytology and immunohistochemistry is technically easy and could after TME surgery identify those patients who have an increased risk of tumor recurrence. In a positive IPC status, the patient would possibly benefit from either postoperative radiotherapy if the patient did not receive preoperative therapy, or postoperative oncological chemotherapy. Tumour cells may be lysed in sterile water, and some surgeons rinse the abdominal cavity and the bowel distally to the tumour. Neither rinsing the abdomen or rectum in colorectal cancer is routinely occurring and the clinical benefit has not been established. The value of rinsing the abdomen after TME-surgery could also be studied by IPC status. The study hypothesis is that the IPC status is dependent on the surgical quality of the specimen after TME-surgery in rectal cancer patients, and its presence leads to increased risk of local recurrence.
An alternative treatment for low rectal cancer is the extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) technique. We aim to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing conventional ELAPE versus Individual ELAPE.
Compared curative effect，safety and compliance between concurrent chemoradiotherapy and chemo-chemoradio-chemo sequential therapy in locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer.
To evaluate the influence to the blood supply of the anastomosis and the harvest of the No. 253 lymph nodes in different surgical methods--- preserving the left colic artery (LCA) and resect the No. 253 lymph node specifically in the radical resection of rectal carcinoma or dividing at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in the radical resection of rectal carcinoma.
Surgery is the most indicated curative treatment for rectal cancer when disease is diagnosed early, however local recurrence risk increases when the disease is diagnosed at advanced stage.T1-2 tumors have a recurrence rate lower than 10%, while T3N0 tumors have 15% - 35% and positive lymph nodes T3-4 45% to 67% of recurrence rate within 5 years. These data indicate that patient who have a high risk of tumor recurrence should receive an adjuvant therapy treatment. It is possible that adjuvant chemotherapy has a positive impact on survival of patients already treated with neoadjuvant combination therapy. However it is necessary to identify those patients that might have this benefit. An exploratory analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22921 study showed that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy has benefited only the group of patients who had a reduction of tumor stage to ypT0-2. In the group who had no reduction (ypT3-4), there was no benefit. Retrospective analyzes suggest that the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a predictor of prognosis and even benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy. However the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with rectal cancer remains controversial. Therefore, a randomized trial is needed to answer this question. Based on these data the investigators proposed a phase III study, randomized, unblinded, adjuvant chemotherapy based on Fluorouracil(5-FU) and Oxaliplatin versus observation in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma T3-4, N0-1, M0 previously treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and who did not presented complete response. The investigator believes that this subgroup of patients, who have not achieved complete response, will be benefit from adjuvant therapy. Study objective: The main objective of this study is verify if adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU and oxaliplatin, for 4 months, increases recurrence-free survival versus the observation. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of toxicity, overall survival and assessment of biomarkers (study protocol separately). The study's primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS) to be defined as time from randomization to radiological detection of distant disease and / or locoregional recurrence. Isolate carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) increase will not be consider as recurrence until a new measurable lesion be found. NOTE: The TNM system is based on the size and/or extent (reach) of the primary tumor (T), the amount of spread to nearby lymph nodes (N), and the presence of metastasis (M) or secondary tumors formed by the spread of cancer cells to other parts of the body.