View clinical trials related to Pulmonary Embolism.
Filter by:Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) accounts for 5-10% of in-hospital deaths. Systemic anticoagulation (AC) is the standard of care and thrombolysis is recommended for those at a higher mortality risk. Catheter-directed therapies, mainly standard infusion catheter thrombolysis (CDT) and ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT), have been introduced as new more effective and safer treatment modalities. USAT is a modification of standard catheter lysis utilizing a system of local ultrasound to dissociate the fibrin matrix of the thrombus with simultaneous acoustic streaming of the thrombolytic agent, allowing more efficient thrombolysis. However, there is limited comparative effectiveness data against standard multi-side hole catheter infusion. More rapid clearance of pulmonary thrombus by USAT compared to standard CDT may prove to be clinically beneficial and cost effective. Alternatively, if thrombus clearance is similar, the cost of USAT may exceed the cost of CDT (equipment and disposables), without realization any advantage.
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious disease and the third most common cardiovascular disease following myocardial infarction and stroke. The most common symptoms of acute PE are breathlessness and respiratory pain. Although many patients have respiratory pain in acute PE, the treatment of pain is not well described in literature. It is also unclear how long after acute PE the respiratory pain persists. In other conditions with respiratory associated pain, clinical treatment guidelines are available to avoid complications, such as pneumonia, related to impaired respiratory function. The purpose of this randomized controlled multicenter study is to evaluate the effect of a treatment, in patients with respiratory associated acute PE pain, consisting of information on anatomy and physiology in acute PE and breathing technique in addition to usual care treatment. The above treatment will be compared to conventional treatment in PE with respiratory associated pain, which means treatment with analgesics. One hundred sixty patients recruited from the Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Alingsås Hospital will participate in the study. Both groups are examined before and after interventions related to respiratory associated pain, measured with visual analogue scale (VAS), analgesic consumption, lung function measured with Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF), physical disability impairment measured by Disability Rating Index (DRI) and questions about the patients self-efficacy on managing their respiratory associated pain, days hospitalized, pneumonia rate during or after hospitalization, oxygen saturation and patient satisfaction. Both groups are followed from the inclusion date to 14 days after inclusion through physical visits by the physiotherapist during hospital care and by telephone contact after discharge. If the positive clinical experience of the information and breathing technique can be confirmed in the study, the method could be spread and used as an easily accessible new treatment method.
Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a frequent disease, the third cause of cardiovascular death after stroke and myocardial infarction. According to European guidelines of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of European Respiratory Society (ERS), the prognostic stratification of PE severity is mandatory as soon as PE is diagnosed. This stratification includes the hemodynamic status, and specific tools : the assessment of the sPESI score, and the evaluation of PE's impact on right ventricle (RV) : increased biomarkers (troponin, BNP) and right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio. the RV/LV ration may be evaluated ideally by transthoracic echo (TTE), or by CT scan. Unfortunately, only 10% of patients with PE are evaluated with TTE by a cardiologist in the initial time of PE diagnosis. Hence, the CT scan is the most frequent way to assess RV/LV ratio. However, CT is not possible for all patients (patients with contra-indication) or may have difficulties to provide a clear assessment because of technical issues. Then, there is a need for morphological evaluation of RV as soon as PE is diagnosed, in every clinical setting. The improvement in technologies allowed the development of clinical echography (CE) in emergency departments. CE is already available, non-invasive, less expansive, and may be a good way to assess RV/LV ratio in patients with PE diagnosed in emergency departments. The investigators propose a prospective, multicenter study to assess the sensitivity of CE in patients with PE, compared to CT scan to detect RV/LV ≥0.9.
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a condition in which the vessels carrying blood to the lungs become suddenly blocked, usually by a blood clot. There are a number of adverse consequences that result, with one of the most significant being strain on the right side of the heart (which must push blood through the blocked arteries to the lungs). Although this strain on the right heart is very important, current methods for measuring it are flawed. The standard practice is to obtain an echocardiogram (ultrasound of the heart), from which indirect measurements of the size of the heart are used to make inferences about right heart strain. This method can help guide management in some patients, but it in not a sensitive test and does not provide detailed information. Patients with PE are treated with blood thinning medications. Some patients may be referred to the Interventional Radiology (IR) team for endovascular intervention, in which catheters are placed into the patient's vessels under radiologic guidance and advanced to the lungs to remove the clot entirely. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a well-established imaging technique that produces highly detailed images of the heart's structure and function, with no risks to patients of ionizing radiation or intravenous contrast. Cardiac MRI is far superior to echocardiogram in evaluation of the right side of the heart, however it has not been widely used in the evaluation of patients with PE. We propose that by using a fast MRI protocol, we will be able to detect right heart strain with more accuracy than echocardiogram. Furthermore, we hypothesize that MRI images obtained before and after IR catheter-directed therapy will demonstrate the degree to which strain is relieved with this treatment. Finally, we believe that using MRI may help to guide management of patients with PE by detecting early or mild heart strain before it progresses. In order to test these hypotheses, we plan to image PE patients who have been referred to the IR team with MRI. Patients recruited for this study will undergo two short MRI scans - one immediately before treatment, and one after completion of IR treatment (which lasts approximately 12-24 hours).
The rates of Venous thromboembolism (VTE) after orthopedic surgery are as high as 40-60% without prophylactic measures. Enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, produces an anticoagulant effect by binding antithrombin, thereby accelerating antithrombin's inactivation of coagulation factor Xa (FXa), thus decreasing the likelihood of clot formation. Despite standard dosing enoxaparin prophylaxis, VTE rates in post-operative orthopedic trauma patients remain as high as 12.2%.The investigators will examine enoxaparin pharmacokinetics and test whether a clinical protocol for real-time enoxaparin dose adjustment can favorably alter the proportion of patients with in-range anti-Factor Xa (aFXa) levels. Outcomes will include peak and trough steady-state aFXa levels in response to standard and escalated doses of enoxaparin and the incidence of venous thromboembolism and bleeding events post-surgery. In the trauma and orthopaedic populations, patients with low initial aFXa levels are significantly more likely to develop deep venous thrombosis. Thus, this study has important implications for appropriate enoxaparin dose magnitude and frequency, and may ultimately help to decrease the substantial morbidity and mortality associated with post-operative VTE.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate safety and initial effectiveness of DS-9231 when taken together with current standard of care. Evaluation will be done with low, medium and then high doses of DS-9231 versus placebo, in participants with medium-risk acute pulmonary embolism.
This study seeks to uncover potential genetic determinants of pulmonary embolism (PE). Our translational goal is to ultimately identify certain genetic markers that will allow us to stratify patients in terms of their PE risk post total knee or total hip arthroplasty. The clinical implications for this study would allow for better patient care by lowering the risk of post-operative bleeding while still preventing symptomatic PEs and deep vein thromboses (DVTs). We look to sample patients who have a history of PE after undergoing total knee or total hip arthroplasty. We will sample these patients' blood DNA for a set of DNA genetic markers. To do so, we will utilize the Taqman assay, which is a PCR-based 5'-nuclease allelic discrimination assay to determine single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes at specified loci. The region flanking the SNP is amplified using two allele-specific fluorescent probes, allowing for the detection of each allele in a single tube. Using this assay, there is no post-PCR processing because the probes are included in the PCR reaction (Hui). Using this approach, we will measure the frequency of genetic mutations in patients who have developed a PE after a total joint arthroplasty. This data would then be used to perform a prospective study to determine a subset of genetic markers that can definitively be used to risk stratify patients.
Patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary embolism and high thromboembolic risk will be randomized to screening for atrial fibrillation or standard of care using intermittent ECG registration for at least two weeks.
Approximately half a million Americans annually experience venous thromboembolic disease, including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Since 2010, four new oral anticoagulants have been approved for marketing in addition to the vitamin K antagonist warfarin. Very limited head-to-head data exists comparing these treatment options, leaving patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders with little guidance for selecting the best strategy that balances recurrence reduction with risk of bleeding. In the DARE Warfarin CER Study, the researchers compare all five currently available oral anticoagulant agents for the extended treatment of DVT and PE, as well as no extended treatment. This study also aims to evaluate whether treatment heterogeneity exists for specific populations, such as older patients or those with renal dysfunction. In a secondary aim, the study will also leverage a database of linked electronic health record-insurance claims to validate diagnosis definitions and account for potential residual confounding by factors unmeasured in claims data. As the patient population includes all Medicare novel anticoagulant users and large numbers of commercially insured and Medicaid patients, the results will likely be transportable to the majority of US patients experiencing a DVT or PE. Pursuant to the objectives of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, a study advisory committee consisting of key stakeholders will be actively involved in the study design and dissemination of results.
This trial aims at determining if dabigatran is effective in the treatment of malignancy associated VTE. Tolerance and safety of dabigatran will also be assessed. This is a single armed trial of dabigatran in patients with malignancy associated VTE. The target recruitment is 99 consecutive patients with active malignancy and newly diagnosed VTE (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) in Queen Mary Hospital. Tinzaparin 175 iu/kg daily will be started after the diagnosis of VTE is confirmed (duplex Doppler ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis, and computed tomography for pulmonary embolism), and a written consent is obtained. Patients will be switched to dabigatran 150mg twice daily from day 6 onwards. The first dose of dabigatran will be given within 2 hours before the time that the next dose of tinzaparin would have been due. Anticoagulation will be continued as long as malignancy is active. If patients achieve a complete remission of their underlying malignancies, dabigatran will be continued for 6 months further.