View clinical trials related to Psoriatic Arthritis.
Filter by:The primary purpose of this study is to describe the Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) participant profiles depending on whether their disease is managed by a dermatologist or by a rheumatologist in routine practice.
Fatigue is common and disabling for most patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease. Therapies designed to improve physical activity and 'talking' treatments, which positively help patients change the way they think and behave, are both helpful in reducing the burden of the fatigue. However, few patients have access to these treatments in most health services. This situation results from the absence of standardised programmes and limited availability of relevant therapists. The investigators aim to enhance access to fatigue alleviating physical activity and talking therapies by testing innovative,standardised and cost-effective approaches to treatment delivery. The investigators will also use this opportunity to understand how to select the best treatment for a patient based on their individual profile and to better understand how these treatments actually work. This in turn may lead to more refined and effective therapies in the future.
This study aims to evaluate the impact of AbbVie Care 2.0 on adalimumab's compliance, patient reported outcomes and utilization of health resources over 12 months.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab versus adalimumab in participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who are biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) naive.
Methotrexate (MTX) co-medication can improve the therapeutic effect of biological therapies (e.g. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -inhibitors) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but its role in Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) remains unclear. No data from Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) are available to address the questions whether add-on of MTX to UST monotherapy, or a withdrawal of continuous MTX therapy in patients with newly initiated Ustekinumab (UST) treatment or simultaneously induction of MTX with UST in naive active PsA-patients will influence outcome measurements. So, the purpose of the study is to analyse the effects of blinded MTX-co-medication on outcome in patients treated with UST: Non-inferiority at week 24 of UST monotherapy compared to add-on to MTX in patients with active PsA and at least 12 weeks of MTX treatment prior to screening or who are actually not treated with MTX and do not have prior inadequate response to MTX-treatment for PsA will be demonstrated.
The purpose of this study is to define cut-off values of the most widely used composite scores and patient-reported outcomes, for levels corresponding to remission/low disease activity and for changes in levels corresponding to flares, in PsA, when remission/low disease activity and flare are defined from the patient and physician perspective. The ReFlaP (Remission/Flare in PsA) study is a prospective, multicentric international, longitudinal, observational study.
This is a multicenter, Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in subjects with moderately to severely active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) who have an inadequate response or are intolerant to conventional disease-modifying therapy. A total of approximately 124 subjects will be randomized to one of 2 treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio: oral filgotinib tablets q.d. or matching placebo tablets q.d. The Screening visit will occur within 28 days before study drug administration. At Day 1 (Baseline), eligible subjects will be randomized to treatment for a duration of 16 weeks. The study is concluded with a Follow-up period lasting until 4 weeks after the last dose. Consequently, each subject will stay in the study for a maximum of 24 weeks (from Screening visit to Follow-up visit).
Infliximab and other TNF-inhibitors have revolutionised the treatment of several immunological inflammatory diseases. Still, more than half of the patients either do not respond sufficiently to infliximab therapy or loose efficacy over time. The large individual variation in the serum drug concentrations on standard doses and the development of anti-drug antibodies are thought to be main reasons for these treatment failures. An individualised treatment strategy based on systematic assessments of serum drug concentrations, therapeutic drug monitoring, has been proposed as a clinical tool to optimise efficacy of infliximab treatment. Therapeutic drug monitoring seems reasonable both from a clinical and an economical point of view, but the effectiveness of this treatment strategy still remain to be shown. The NOR-DRUM study is planned as a national, randomised controlled multicentre trial in two parts aiming to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring in order to achieve remission in patients with immunological inflammatory diseases starting infliximab treatment (part A) and in order to maintain disease control in patients on maintenance infliximab treatment (part B). The results of the NOR-DRUM study will hopefully contribute to an implementation of a personalised medicine approach to treatment with infliximab and other biological drugs.
An abnormal intestinal microbiota may be the mediator of the common inflammatory pathways seen in psoriatic arthritis. This study will explore clinical aspects associated with modifying the intestinal microbiota by infusing fecal donor microbiota into the small intestine of psoriatic arthritis patients with a minimum of three swollen joints despite at least three months of methotrexate treatment.
The Investigators will examine if DC-STAMP can serve as an early marker of TNFi response in PsA. Identification of such a biomarker would permit rapid transition to a new agent, a major treatment advance. TNFi are the most effective therapies in PsA, however, methotrexate is frequently initiated early in the disease course based on its significantly lower cost. Unfortunately, the efficacy of MTX has not been supported in clinical trials and up to 40% of patients do not respond to TNFi therapy. Moreover, valid biomarkers to predict MTX or TNFi responses are currently unavailable. This study may also provide the first data on the comparative efficacy of MTX and TNFi using clinical, Ultrasound (US) and biomarker outcomes.