Psoriasis Clinical Trial
— ECLIPSEOfficial title:
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Study Evaluating the Comparative Efficacy of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) and Secukinumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis
Verified date | September 2019 |
Source | Janssen Research & Development, LLC |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab compared with secukinumab for the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 1048 |
Est. completion date | September 20, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Have a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis (with or without [Psoriatic Arthritis]PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study drug - A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and at Week 0 and agree to urine pregnancy testing before receiving injections - Agree not to receive a live virus or live bacterial vaccination during the study, or within 3 months after the last administration of study drug - Agree not to receive a Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination during the study, or within 12 months after the last administration of study drug - Agree to avoid prolonged sun exposure and avoid use of tanning booths or other ultraviolet light sources during study Exclusion Criteria: - Has a history or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances - Has previously received guselkumab or secukinumab - Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including but not limited to chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (example bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic nonremitting cystitis), fungal infection (mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers - Has a history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly - Is unable or unwilling to undergo multiple venipunctures because of poor tolerability or lack of easy access to veins |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | The Skin Centre | Benowa | |
Australia | Sinclair Dermatology | East Melbourne | |
Australia | Fremantle Dermatology | Fremantle | |
Australia | Clinical Trials SA Pty Ltd | Hectorville | |
Australia | Premier Specialists | Kogarah | |
Australia | St George Dermatology & Skin Cancer Centre | Kogarah | |
Australia | Skin&Cancer Foundation Inc | Melbourne | |
Australia | Royal Melbourne Hospital | Parkville | |
Australia | Westmead Hospital | Westmead | |
Australia | Woden Dermatology | Woden | |
Australia | Veracity Clinical Research | Woolloongabba | |
Canada | CCA Medical Research Corporation | Ajax | |
Canada | Stratica Medical | Edmonton | |
Canada | Eastern Canada Research Associates | Halifax | |
Canada | Dermatrials Research | Hamilton | Ontario |
Canada | Guenther Dermatology Research Centre | London | Ontario |
Canada | DermEdge Research | Mississauga | |
Canada | Innovaderm Research | Montreal | |
Canada | North Bay Dermatology Centre | North Bay | Ontario |
Canada | Skin Centre for Dermatology | Peterborough | Ontario |
Canada | Centre Dermatologique | Quebec | |
Canada | Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical | Surrey | |
Canada | Toronto Research Centre | Toronto | Ontario |
Canada | K. Papp Clinical Research | Waterloo | |
Canada | XLR8 Medical Research | Windsor | |
Czechia | Nemocnice Jihlava | Jihlava | |
Czechia | Kozni ambulance Kutna Hora, s.r.o. | Kutna Hora | |
Czechia | DERMAMEDICA s.r.o. | Nachod | |
Czechia | Nemocnice Novy Jicin a.s. | Novy Jicin | |
Czechia | Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava | Ostrava- Poruba | |
Czechia | Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady | Praha | |
Czechia | Dermatologicka ambulance | Svitavy | |
Czechia | Masarykova nemocnice v Usti nad Labem | Usti Nad Labem | |
France | CHU Bordeaux - Hopital St Andre | Bordeaux | |
France | ICH Hopital A. Morvan | Brest | |
France | Groupe Hospitalier La Rochelle - Re - Aunis | La Rochelle | |
France | Le Bateau Blanc | Martigues | |
France | CHU Nantes - Hotel Dieu | Nantes | |
France | CHU de Nice Hopital de l Archet | Nice | |
France | Hopital Charles Nicolle | Rouen | |
France | Hopital Larrey CHU de Toulouse | Toulouse | |
Germany | Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte (CCM) Allergie Center | Berlin | |
Germany | ISA GmbH | Berlin | |
Germany | Universitatsklinikum Bonn | Bonn | |
Germany | Klinische Forschung Dresden GmbH | Dresden | |
Germany | University Hospital Dresden | Dresden | |
Germany | Universitatsklinikum Essen | Essen | |
Germany | Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt | Frankfurt am Main | |
Germany | MensingDerma research GmbH | Hamburg | |
Germany | SCIderm GmbH | Hamburg | |
Germany | Universitaetsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf | Hamburg | |
Germany | Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Kiel | Kiel | |
Germany | Universitaetsklinik Luebeck | Luebeck | |
Germany | Hautarztpraxis | Mahlow | |
Germany | Technische Universitaet Muenchen | Muenchen | |
Germany | Universitaetsklinikum Muenster | Muenster | |
Germany | Universitaetsklinik Tuebingen | Tuebingen | |
Germany | Centrovital | Witten | |
Hungary | Semmelweis Egyetem | Budapest | |
Hungary | Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont | Debrecen | |
Hungary | Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mor Oktatokorhaz | Kaposvar | |
Hungary | Bacs-kiskun Megyei Korhaz | Kecskemet | |
Hungary | Borsod-Abauj-Zemplen Megyei Korhaz es Egyetemi Oktato Korhaz | Miskolc | |
Hungary | Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem | Pecs | |
Hungary | Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem | Szeged | |
Hungary | Markusovszky Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz | Szombathely | |
Hungary | Medmare Egeszsegugyi Es Szolgaltato Bt. | Veszprem | |
Poland | NZOZ Osteo-Medic S.C. Artur Racewicz i Jerzy Supronik | Bialystok | |
Poland | Specderm Poznanska sp. j. | Bialystok | |
Poland | Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 1 im. Dr A. Jurasza | Bydgoszcz | |
Poland | Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze | Elblag | |
Poland | Copernicus Podmiot Leczniczy Sp. z o.o | Gdansk | |
Poland | Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne | Krakow | |
Poland | Centrum Badawcze Wspolczesnej Terapii | Lodz | |
Poland | Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o | Lodz | |
Poland | CRC Sp. z o.o. | Poznan | |
Poland | Solumed S.C. | Poznan | |
Poland | Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne | Swidnik | |
Poland | NZOZ Poradnia Dermatologiczno-Wenerologiczna Mediderm | Torun | |
Poland | Przychodnia Specjalistyczna High-Med | Warszawa | |
Poland | Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny | Warszawa | |
Poland | Centrum Medyczne WroMedica | Wroclaw | |
Poland | DermMedica Sp. z o.o. | Wroclaw | |
Spain | Hosp. Univ. Fundacion Alcorcon | Alcorcon | |
Spain | Hosp. Gral. Univ. de Alicante | Alicante | |
Spain | Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol | Badalona | |
Spain | Hosp. Univ. de Cruces | Barakaldo | |
Spain | Hosp. de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hosp. Del Mar | Barcelona | |
Spain | Hosp. Univ. de Basurto | Bilbao Vizcaya | |
Spain | Hosp. Reina Sofia | Cordoba | |
Spain | Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre | Madrid | |
Spain | Hosp. Univ. de Torrejon | Madrid | |
Spain | Hosp. Univ. Infanta Leonor | Madrid | |
Spain | Hosp. Univ. La Paz | Madrid | |
Spain | Hosp. de Manises | Manises | |
Spain | Hosp. Provincial de Pontevedra | Pontevedra | |
Spain | Hosp. Univ. I Politecni La Fe | Valencia | |
United States | Academic Dermatology Associates | Albuquerque | New Mexico |
United States | Atlanta Dermatology, Vein & Research Center | Alpharetta | Georgia |
United States | Advanced Medical Research | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Austin Dermatology Associates | Austin | Texas |
United States | Great Lakes Research Group | Bay City | Michigan |
United States | Dermatologists of Greater Columbus | Bexley | Ohio |
United States | University of Alabama Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Olympian Clinical Research | Clearwater | Florida |
United States | Florida Academic Dermatology Centers | Coral Gables | Florida |
United States | Menter Dermatology Research Institute | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Modern Research Associates | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Clinical Research Center of Connecticut | Danbury | Connecticut |
United States | Henry Ford Medical Center | Detroit | Michigan |
United States | Windsor Dermatology | East Windsor | New Jersey |
United States | Hamzavi Dermatology | Fort Gratiot | Michigan |
United States | Minnesota Clinical Study Center | Fridley | Minnesota |
United States | The Ohio State University | Gahanna | Ohio |
United States | Dermatology Consulting Services, PLLC | High Point | North Carolina |
United States | Suzanne Bruce and Associates - The Center for Skin Research | Houston | Texas |
United States | Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group | Indianapolis | Indiana |
United States | Clinical Partners | Johnston | Rhode Island |
United States | Southern California Permanente Medical Group | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Dermatology Specialists | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Marietta Dermatology Clinical Research | Marietta | Georgia |
United States | Virginia Clinical Research | Norfolk | Virginia |
United States | Central Sooner Research | Norman | Oklahoma |
United States | Renstar Medical Research | Ocala | Florida |
United States | Dermatology Specialists | Oceanside | California |
United States | Park Avenue Dermatology | Orange Park | Florida |
United States | University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Indiana Clinical Trial Center | Plainfield | Indiana |
United States | Oregon Dermatology and Research Center | Portland | Oregon |
United States | Oregon Medical Research Center | Portland | Oregon |
United States | DermAssociates, PC | Rockville | Maryland |
United States | Arlington Dermatology | Rolling Meadows | Illinois |
United States | Central Dermatology | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Progressive Clinical Research | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | MedDerm Associates | San Diego | California |
United States | San Luis Dermatology & Laser Clinic, Inc | San Luis Obispo | California |
United States | Southern California Dermatology | Santa Ana | California |
United States | Dermatology Associates of Seattle | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Northshore Universite Healthsystem | Skokie | Illinois |
United States | Somerset Skin Centre | Troy | Michigan |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Janssen Research & Development, LLC |
United States, Australia, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Spain,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-90 Response at Week 48 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score. | Week 48 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Both Week 12 and 48 | Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 response at both Week 12 and 48 was reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. | Week 12 and 48 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Week 12 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. Due to failing to achieve superiority of prior secondary endpoint, no formal statistical testing was performed for endpoints from this point onwards. | Week 12 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Week 12 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. | Week 12 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-100 Response at Week 48 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 100 response was defined as 100% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. | Week 48 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) at Week 48 | The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). | Week 48 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 48 | The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). | Week 48 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Both Week 16 and 48 | Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 response at both Week 16 and 48 was reported. The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. | Week 16 and 48 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Week 16 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. | Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Week 16 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. | Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at All 7 Visits From Week 24 Through Week 48 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. Percentage of participants who achieved a PASI-90 response at all 7 visits from Week 24 to 48 (Week 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48) was reported. | Week 24 up to Week 48 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 | The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). | Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 12 | The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). | Week 12 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI-75 Response at Week 48 Among PASI-75 Responders at Week 12 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. | Week 48 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI-90 Response at Week 48 Among PASI-90 Responders at Week 16 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. PASI 90 response was defined as at least a 90 percent (%) reduction in PASI relative to baseline. | Week 48 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI Response (PASI 100, PASI-90, PASI-75 and PASI-50) Over Time From Week 1 to Week 56 | PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72.Participants with >=50%, >= 75%, >=90% and 100% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50, 75, 90 and PASI 100 responders, respectively. | Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 56 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With IGA Responses Through Week 56 | The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). | Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 56 | |
Secondary | Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Through Week 56 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. | Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and Week 56 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03236870 -
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Patient-Reported Outcome of Adalimumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in China
|
||
Completed |
NCT00078819 -
Etanercept (Enbrel®) in Psoriasis - Pediatrics
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04841187 -
Assessing the Long Term Effectiveness and Safety of Systemic Treatments in Cutaneous Psoriasis
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03927352 -
The Purpose of This Research Study is to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of SCT630 and Adalimumab (HUMIRA®) in Adults With Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03284879 -
Post-Marketing Surveillance Study of OTEZLA
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06027034 -
Effectiveness of a Digital Health Application for Psoriasis
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06050330 -
CD4+ T Cells and S100A7 Epression in Normal and Psoriatic Skin: A Histological and Histochemical Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05744466 -
A Real-world Observational Study to Compare Effectiveness of Deucravacitinib Vs Apremilast in Adults With Plaque Psoriasis
|
||
Completed |
NCT04149587 -
A Study of Brodalumab (SILIQ®) in Psoriasis Participants With Inadequate Response to Their Current Biologic Agent Regimen
|
||
Completed |
NCT01384630 -
Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of RA-18C3 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03998683 -
A Study of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Palmoplantar-non-Pustular Psoriasis
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03556202 -
A Long-term Study to Evaluate Safety and Maintenance of Treatment Effect of LY3074828 in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis (OASIS-3)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05051943 -
A Study of the Real-world Use of an Adalimumab Biosimilar and Evaluation of Nutritional Status on the Therapeutic Response
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06077331 -
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of HS-10374 for Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04316585 -
A Study to Evaluate the Benefit and Safety of GSK2982772 in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Participants
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04894890 -
A Prospective Multicenter Study for the Assessment of Treatment Patterns, Effectiveness and Safety of Secukinumab in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in a Real-world Setting in China
|
||
Completed |
NCT00358384 -
Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Study With Topical Formulation Of GW786034
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03757013 -
A Study to Assess Benefits of Apremilast in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Followed by Dermatologists Under Real Life Settings in France
|
||
Completed |
NCT03265613 -
Safety and Efficacy of Expanded Allogeneic AD-MSCs in Patients With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05003531 -
A Study to Evaluate IBI112 in the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 2 |