Psoriasis Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) Delivered Via a SelfDose (TM) Device in the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis
Verified date | September 2018 |
Source | Janssen Research & Development, LLC |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, usability, and acceptability of guselkumab delivered using SelfDose device in participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 78 |
Est. completion date | February 6, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | February 6, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin) at screening and at Week 0 - Before randomization, a woman must be either: a) Not of childbearing potential: premenarchal; postmenopausal (greater than [>] 45 years of age with amenorrhea for at least 12 months or any age with amenorrhea for at least 6 months and a serum follicle-stimulating hormone level (FSH) >40 International Units Per Liter [IU/L]); permanently sterile (example, tubal occlusion, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy); or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy, b) Of childbearing potential and practicing a highly effective method of birth control, consistent with local regulations regarding the use of birth control methods for subjects participating in clinical studies: example, established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception; placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS); barrier methods: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) plus spermicidal foam/gel/ film/cream/suppository (if available in their locale); male partner sterilization (the vasectomized partner should be the sole partner for that participant); true abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant) - Agree not to receive a Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) vaccination during the study, or within 12 months after the last administration of study drug - Have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to [>=] 12 at screening and at baseline - Have an involved body surface area (BSA) >= 10 percent (%) at screening and at baseline Exclusion Criteria: - Has unstable cardiovascular disease, defined as a recent clinical deterioration (eg, unstable angina, rapid atrial fibrillation) in the last 3 months or a cardiac hospitalization within the last 3 months - Has a history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly - Has a transplanted organ (with exception of a corneal transplant >3 months before the first administration of study drug) - Has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular) - Has received any anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) biologic therapy within 3 months before the first administration of study drug |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Dermatrials Research | Hamilton | Ontario |
Canada | DermEdge Research | Mississauga | Ontario |
Canada | Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical | Surrey | British Columbia |
Poland | Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Osteo-Medic s.c. Artur Racewicz i Jerzy Supronik | Bialystok | |
Poland | Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 1 im. Dr A. Jurasza | Bydgoszcz | |
Poland | Centrum Medyczne WroMedica | Wroclaw | |
United States | Hamzavi Dermatology | Fort Gratiot | Michigan |
United States | Clinical Partners | Johnston | Rhode Island |
United States | Dermatology Specialists | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Virginia Clinical Research | Norfolk | Virginia |
United States | Renstar Medical Research | Ocala | Florida |
United States | University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Indiana Clinical Trial Center | Plainfield | Indiana |
United States | Arlington Dermatology | Rolling Meadows | Illinois |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Janssen Research & Development, LLC |
United States, Canada, Poland,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 | The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) or minimal (1) were considered IGA cleared or minimal responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure. Participants who discontinued study drug due to lack of efficacy, an adverse event (AE) of worsening of psoriasis, or who started a protocol-prohibited medication/therapy during study that could improve psoriasis were considered as treatment failures for the study. | Week 16 | |
Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent (%) to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure. | Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16 | The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) were considered IGA cleared responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure. | Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a PASI 100 Response at Week 16 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants with 100% improvement in PASI from baseline (PASI score=0) were considered PASI 100 responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure. | Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Mild or Better (Less Than or Equal to [<=] 2) at Week 16 | The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0), minimal (1), or mild (2) were considered IGA mild or better responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure. | Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a PASI 50 Response and a PASI 75 Response at Week 16 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants with >=50% and >= 75% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50 and PASI 75 responders respectively. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure. | Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 16 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. | Baseline and Week 16 | |
Secondary | Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score Through Week 40 | The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16. | Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended every 8 weeks [q8w] dosing interval) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) and Mild or Better (<=2) Through Week 40 | The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) or minimal (1) were considered IGA cleared or minimal responders while those achieved an IGA score of cleared (0), minimal (1), or mild (2) were considered IGA mild or better responders. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16. | Week 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended q8w dosing interval) | |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Responses, PASI 90 Responses, PASI 75 Responses, and PASI 50 Responses | PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72.Participants with >=50%, >= 75%, >=90% and >= 100% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50, 75, 90 and PASI 100 responders, respectively. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16. | Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended q8w dosing interval) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03236870 -
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Patient-Reported Outcome of Adalimumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in China
|
||
Completed |
NCT00078819 -
Etanercept (Enbrel®) in Psoriasis - Pediatrics
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04841187 -
Assessing the Long Term Effectiveness and Safety of Systemic Treatments in Cutaneous Psoriasis
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03927352 -
The Purpose of This Research Study is to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of SCT630 and Adalimumab (HUMIRA®) in Adults With Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03284879 -
Post-Marketing Surveillance Study of OTEZLA
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06027034 -
Effectiveness of a Digital Health Application for Psoriasis
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06050330 -
CD4+ T Cells and S100A7 Epression in Normal and Psoriatic Skin: A Histological and Histochemical Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05744466 -
A Real-world Observational Study to Compare Effectiveness of Deucravacitinib Vs Apremilast in Adults With Plaque Psoriasis
|
||
Completed |
NCT04149587 -
A Study of Brodalumab (SILIQ®) in Psoriasis Participants With Inadequate Response to Their Current Biologic Agent Regimen
|
||
Completed |
NCT01384630 -
Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of RA-18C3 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03998683 -
A Study of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Palmoplantar-non-Pustular Psoriasis
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03556202 -
A Long-term Study to Evaluate Safety and Maintenance of Treatment Effect of LY3074828 in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis (OASIS-3)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05051943 -
A Study of the Real-world Use of an Adalimumab Biosimilar and Evaluation of Nutritional Status on the Therapeutic Response
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06077331 -
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of HS-10374 for Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04316585 -
A Study to Evaluate the Benefit and Safety of GSK2982772 in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Participants
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04894890 -
A Prospective Multicenter Study for the Assessment of Treatment Patterns, Effectiveness and Safety of Secukinumab in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in a Real-world Setting in China
|
||
Completed |
NCT00358384 -
Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Study With Topical Formulation Of GW786034
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03757013 -
A Study to Assess Benefits of Apremilast in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Followed by Dermatologists Under Real Life Settings in France
|
||
Completed |
NCT03265613 -
Safety and Efficacy of Expanded Allogeneic AD-MSCs in Patients With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05003531 -
A Study to Evaluate IBI112 in the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
|
Phase 2 |